Case law

Brown v. . Morris

83 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

Golden v. Levy, 1 Car. L. R., 527. In Tull v. Trustees, 75 N. … Monroe v. Phelps, 8 Ellis & Black, 739.

Alexander v. Brown

236 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1952

Smith v. Insurance Company, 208 N.C. 99 , 179 S.E. 457 . … Su *216 preme Court Rule No. 20 (2), General Statutes, Yol. 4, Appendix 1; Cherry v. Walker, 232 N.C. 725 , 62 S.E. 2d 329 ; King v.

Brown v. . Brittain

84 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881

Moody v. Sitton, 2 Ired. Eq., 382 . The assignee is never put in better condition than the assignor; he takes exactly the position of the assignor. Parsons on Contracts, 227. … Lim., 286; Tabor v. Ward, 83 N. C., 291 . *555 As no erior appears in the record the judgment of the superior court of Henderson is affirmed. Ho error. Affirmed.

McEwan v. Brown

176 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1918

Brown, a nonresident of this State, filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Beaufort a certified copy of the last will and testament of Sylvester Brown, and of the probate thereof, in the Corporation Court … Brown,, produced it and testified that it was lodged with him for safe-keeping.

Harris v. . Brown

123 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1898

Syme v. Trice , 96 N.C. 246 . … Everett v. Reynolds , 114 N.C. 367 . The sale was made 15 years ago, and if the defendant believed the record would not protect him, he should have made his fears known at an earlier day. Affirmed.

Brown v. Hutchinson

155 N.C. 205 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1911

In this case the plaintiff had already introduced a grant from the State to Eli Brown, dated October, 1846, and duly registered. He could therefore have shown seven years’ possession under color. Gilchrist v. … The deeds from Eli Brown to Absher in 1855 and of Absher to Elijah Brown in 1859, and the deed from the latter’s executors in 1862, recorded in- 1885, were competent to show color of title. In Janney v. Robbins, 141 N.

Cline v. Brown

286 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1975

CLINE v. Bertram Ervin BROWN II. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 4, 1975. Wilson & Morrow, for the plaintiff. Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, for the defendant.

State v. . Brown

125 N.C. 704 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1899

In State v. Dixon, 114 N. C., 850 , it is said: “In trials for this offense it must be borne in mind that the guilty intent is the intent to carry the weapon concealed, and does not depend upon the intent to use it. … This case reviewed previous authorities, and has itself been cited and followed in State v. Pigford, 117 N. C., 748 ; State v. Reams, 121 N. C., 556 . In this last case, FatRcuoth, O.

Brown v. Griffin

263 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1964

Pensak v. Peerless Oil Co., 166 A. 792 ; Limbert v. Bishop, 101 S.E. 2d 148 ; Morgan v. Woodruff, 208 S.W. 2d 628 ; Hudgens v. Mayeaux, 143 So. 2d 606 ; Martin v. Sheffield, 189 P. 2d 127 ; 15 AM. … Brown: “We are pleased to attach our draft in the amount of $500.00, payable to you on the Medical Expenses incurred as a result of the captioned accident.

Brown v. . Buchanan

194 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1927

Tripp v. Little, 186 N. C., 215 ; Sullivan v. Blount, 165 N. C., 7 ; Hemphill v. Hemphill, 138 N. C., 504 . … In Hoge v. Lee, 184 N.

Wilson v. Brown

134 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1904

Brown, in which a sale under two executions issued from the Superior Court of Greene County, upon judgments in favor of G. G. Edwards and wife v. B. F. Wilson, Julia C. Dixon, Executrix, v. B. F. Wilson, is recited. … Brown, was adverse to him and if continued for twenty years would have ripened into perfect title. Scarborough v. Scarborough, 122 N. C., 234 .

Woodridge v. . Brown

149 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1908

Thomas v. Simpson, 80 N. C., 4 . In Love v. Miller, 104 N. C., 582 , the contract was to sell cotton to be of “average grade of low middling,” etc. Held, a warranty that it would come up to the description. In Reiger v. … Critcher v. Porter McNeal Co., 135 N. C., 542 ; Allen v. Tompkins, 136 N. C., 208 .

Brown v. . McKee

108 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

In Ruggles v. … So in Hooks v.

State v. . Brown

207 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1934

S. v. Griggs, 197 N. C., 352 , 148 S. E., 547 ; Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., 268 , 148 S. E., 233 ; S. v. Palmore, 189 N. C., 538 , 127 S. E., 599 ; S. v. Wheeler, 185 N. C., 670 , 116 S. E., 413 . … S. v. Keaton, supra; S. v. Lee, 206 N. C., 472 , 174 S. E., 288 . New trial.

Brown v. . Guthery

190 N.C. 822 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1925

Whitehurst v. Gotwalt, 189 N. C., 577 . … Tested remainders are defined by Justice Walker in Richardson v. Richardson, 152 N.

Brown v. Railroad

141 N.C. 874 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1906

Marshburn v. Brown

210 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1936

See Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 , and Greensboro v. Guilford County, 209 N. C., 655 , 184 S. E., 473 . … In such case, the board of county commissioners is performing the duty which the Constitution imposes upon said board in the first instance. In Reeves v.

State v. Brown

238 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953

S. v. Barnhardt, 230 N.C. 223 , 52 S.E. 2d 904 ; also S. v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236 , 66 S.E. 2d 907 . And possession, within the meaning of the statute, may be either actual or constructive. See S. v. … Webb, 233 N.C. 382 , 64 S.E. 2d 268 , and cases cited; also S. v. Parker, supra, and cases cited. Hence in the judgment from which this appeal is taken, there is found No error.

Fisher v. Brown

131 N.C. 828 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1902

Parker v. Brown.

136 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1904

Kiff v. Kiff, supra. … See also Brown v. Morris, 83 N. C., 251 , and Ice Co. v. Coal Co., 134 N. C., 574 . In Thigpen v. Leigh, supra, it appeared that the lessee “of his own accord abandoned the crop in Tune.”