Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.64s
109 N.C. 124 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891
Womble v. Leach, 83 N. C., 84 ; Ledbetter v. Quick, 90 N. … his crops, then he was entitled to recover the reasonable value of the board, and the same would (nothing to the contrary appearing) constitute an advancement, and, therefore, a lien upon the crops.
Cited 4 timesPublished103 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889
This is an application to rehear the case of Brown v. Brown, decided at the last term. … The counsel for the appellants, on the argument of the appeal, insisted strongly that the treaty had such effect, and cited Strother v. Cathey, 1 Murph., 162 , and other cases, in support of their contention.
Cited 4 timesPublished199 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1930
App., 204 ; Scott v. Carothers, 47 N. E. (Ind.), 389; Rocap v. Blackwell, 137 N. E. (Ind.), 726; Phillips v. Tribbey, 141 N. E. (Ind.), 262; Stonesifer v. Shriver, 59 At. (Md.), 139; Sullivan v. Horner, 7 At. (N. … C., 394 ; Parker v. Lewis, 13 N. C., 21 ; Ward v. Jones, 44 N. C., 127 ; Ray v. Honeycutt, 119 N. C., 510 .
Cited 2 timesPublished37 N.C. 309 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1842
Isaac Brown, by his will, devised and be-queated to his wife and children severally, lands and personal property. … Freeman v Knight, 2 lred. Eq. Rep. 76.
Cited 2 timesPublished49 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1856
Brown, dec’d., and by a proper construction of the bond it extends to all matters and things for, and on account of which, the defendant was liable, as executor, and in which the parties, who were children of the testator
Cited 4 timesPublished171 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1916
Brown did not have sufficient mental capacity to make a deed. … Robinson v. Robinson, 203 Pa. St., 403; Miller v. Miller, 187 Pa., 572 ; Boyd v. Boyd, 66 Pa., 283 .
Cited 6 timesPublished180 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1920
Brown, testatrix, and in full settlement of all indebtedness of Laura M. Brown, testatrix, to Bedford J. … Jarman v. Day, 179 N. C., 318 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn Re Housing Authority of City of Salisbury
235 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1952
The College Board of Trustees, after considering the proposal, reached the conclusion and so notified the Housing Authority that they could not consent for any part of the campus to be put to use as a public housing site, … Price v. Whisnant, 232 N.C. 653 , 62 S.E. 2d 56 ; Sprinkle v. Reidsville, ante, 140; S. v. Murphy, post, 503.
Cited 48 timesPublished6 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1818
If wc were informed by the records of the County Court of Wilkes that the nuncupative will of James Brown had been proved in Court, and we should *351 be furnished with a copy of it properly authenticated, I think we would … It does not appear that James Brown specially required cither of the witnesses to bear witness to what lie was saying $ the words he uttered were drawn from him by the person whose interest it is to establish them as a will
Cited 2 timesPublished331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992
417 S.E.2d 789 (1992) 331 N.C. 383 Janet Ruth BROWN v. Elbert Ferrell BROWN. No. 85P92. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 7, 1992. Thomas B. Kakassy, Gastonia, for defendant. Lloyd T. Kelso, Gastonia, for plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna