Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.40s
Merrill v. Winston-Salem Forsyth County Board of Education
369 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. . the Board of Commissioners of Bladen Co.
73 N.C. 182 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875
A demand of payment made upon the Board would be no demand at all, for the Board has power only to audit and allow or disallow. … As was said in Love v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWilson Realty Co. v. City and County Planning Board
243 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1956
Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N.C. 310, 312 , 22 S.E. 2d 896 . The writ of mandamus is employed to compel inferior tribunals, officers, or administrative boards to perform duties imposed upon them by law. Hospital v. … Griffith v. Griffith, 240 N.C. 271, 280 , 81 S.E. 2d 918 ; McGill v. Lumberton, 215 N.C. 752 , 3 S.E. 2d 324 . See also Coley v. Dalrymple, 225 N.C. 67, 71 , 33 S.E. 2d 477 ; Credit Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedWalker v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners
368 N.C. 915 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedWesley v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education
369 N.C. 70 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedW. L. Slayton & Co. v. Board of Commissioners
186 N.C. 690 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923
Grant v. Board, of Education, 178 N. C., 329 ; Webb v. Trustees, 143 N. C., 299 ; City of Rome v. Breed & Co., 21 Ga. App., 805 . … Board of Education the Court, in upholding this decision, and as pertinent to this inquiry, said: “On these, the pertinent facts of the controversy, the question chiefly presented was fully considered by us in Webb v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen
352 N.C. 683 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 2000
Cited 0 timesPublished98 N.C. 81 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887
Norment v. Charlotte, 85 N. C., 387 ; Duke v. Brown, 96 N. C., 127 ; Southerland v. Goldsboro, 96 N. C., 49 . But the list, as was said by the Chief Justice, in Duke v. … In Norment v. Charlotte, supra, the board appointed and acted upon the report of a committee.
Cited 19 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Buncombe County v. Bray Bros.
184 N.C. 484 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1922
Tbe county board of education in any county may, however, in its discretion, ask for an election on tbe question of consolidation or the new formation of a district, and submit tbe question of a special tax or tbe issuance … Burney v. Comrs., ante, 274; Barnes v. Comrs., ante, 325.
Cited 7 timesPublishedThomas Jefferson Classical Academy v. Rutherford County Board of Education
724 S.E.2d 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 2012
724 S.E.2d 531 (2012) THOMAS JEFFERSON CLASSICAL ACADEMY, d/b/a Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy Charter School v. The RUTHERFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, d/b/a Rutherford County Schools. No. 460P11. … Campbell, for The Rutherford County Board of Education.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMajebe v. North Carolina Board of Medical Examiners
332 N.C. 484 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1992
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of Education
265 N.C. 35 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1965
In Burlington City Board of Education v. … Burlington City Board of Education v. Allen, supra.
Cited 14 timesPublishedCrlp Durham, Lp v. Durham city/county Board of Adjustment
365 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2011
717 S.E.2d 744 (2011) CRLP DURHAM, LP v. DURHAM CITY/COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and Ellis Road, LLC. No. 153P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 6, 2011. William C. Smith, Jr., Raleigh, for CRLP Durham, LP. … Sindelar, Assistant City Attorney, for Durham City/County Board of Adjustment. Robert E. Zaytoun, Raleigh, for Ellis Road, LLC.
Cited 1 timesPublishedT. L. Herring & Co. v. Board of Adjust.
347 N.C. 674 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1998
Cited 0 timesPublishedTobe-Williams v. New Hanover County Board of Education
367 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublishedTobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. Pollock
187 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1924
Purnell v. Daniel, 43 N. C., 9 ; Heileg v. Stokes, 63 N. C., 612 ; Jarman v. Saunders, supra; Tobacco Co. v. McElwee, 94 N. C., 425 ; Tise v. Whitaker, 144 N. C., 508 ; Stancill v. Joyner, 159 N. C., 617 ; Sanders v. … Harrison v. Bryan, 148 N. C., 315 , and these additional cases are cited, supposedly to the same effect. Pickler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., 221 ; Wallace v. Wilkesboro, 151 N. C., 614 ; Moore v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCahoon v. Board of Commissioners of Hyde County
207 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934
Parker v. Deb nam, 195 N. C., 56 , 141 S. E., 535 ; Castle v. Threadgill, 203 N. C., 441 , 166 S. E., 313 ; Shelly v. Grainger, 204 N. C., 488 , 168 S. E., 736 . … Moore v. Monument Co., 166 N. C., 211 , 81 S. E., 170 ; Rousseau v. Bullis, 201 N. C., 12 . Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Keg, Inc. v. State Board of Alcoholic Control
277 N.C. 450 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1970
Campbell v. ABC Board, 263 N.C. 224 , 139 S.E. 2d 197 ; Thomas v. ABC Board, 258 N.C. 513 , 128 S.E. 2d 884 . … Accord: Wholesale v. ABC Board, 265 N.C. 679 , 144 S.E. 2d 895 . There is no evidence that the action of the Board was arbitrary or in excess of its lawful authority.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRowland v. Board of Elections of Vance County
184 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1922
No power of review, or other judicial authority, in primary elections, has been lodged in the county boards of elections. This question was discussed by Hoke, J., in Brown v. Costen, 176 N. … Moore v. Jones, 76 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBourne v. Board of Financial Control for Buncombe County
207 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1934
Gatling v. Commissioners of Carteret, 92 N. C., 536 ; Piscataway v. First National Bank, 90 A. L. R., 423. … C., 333 ; Lumberton v. Hood, Commissioner, 204 N. C., 171 ; Edgerton v. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, 205 N. C., 816 . For the reasons given, the judgment in the court below is Affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna