Case law

Forrest v. Pitt County Board of Education

328 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1991

401 S.E.2d 366 (1991) 328 N.C. 327 Addie FORREST, Employee, Plaintiff, v. PITT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Employer, Self-Insured, (State Board of Education), Defendants. No. 472A90. Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Board of Commissioners v. Assell, Goetz & Moerlein, Inc.

194 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 1927

Tate v. Comrs., 122 N. C., 812 ; Smathers v. Comrs., 125 N. C., at p. 488; Henderson v. Wilmington, 191 N. C., 269 . In R. R. v. Cherokee County, 177 N. … Construction Co. v. Brockenborough, 187 N. C., 65 ; Holton v. Mocksville, 189 N. C., 144 ; Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, supra.

Peyton v. . Shoe Co.

167 N.C. 279 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1914

Caton v. Toler , 160 N.C. 104 ; Shaw v. Telegraph Co. , 151 N.C. 638 . … In Keson v.

Red Springs City Board of Education v. McMillan

250 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1959

And in Hutchins v. … Indeed, in Durham v.

Sibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy Examiners

357 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 2003

Katherine Inez Hall v. Wake County Board of Elections

280 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

Martin v. Martin, 253 N.C. 704 , 118 S.E. 2d 29 (1960); Sheffield v. Walker, 231 N.C. 556 , 58 S.E. 2d 356 (1950) ; Reynolds v. Cotton Mills, 177 N.C. 412 , 99 S.E. 240 (1919); Wheeler v. … Reynolds v. Cotton Mills, supra; Hannon v. Grizzard, supra; 25 Am. Jur. 2d Domicile § 87 (1966).

Brannon v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

331 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1992

Cloud v. Wilson, 72 N.C. 155 (1875). … Sneed v.

Harris v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

274 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1968

Harris, Elizabeth Harris, and Harlin Patrick v. The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY and the Individual Members Thereof, Namely, W. R. Owens, R. B. Brown, H. W. Pritchett, J. C. Hassell, W. W. … The second sentence in Article IX, Sec. 2, enclosed by parentheses, following the decision in Brown v.

Davis v. . Board of Comm'rs., Stokes Co. and Poindexter

72 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

And a corporation may exceed its powers where there is no moral turpitude; as a Board of County Commissioners contracting a debt to build a church, a very praiseworthy object; but still, it is beyond their power ; and they … The principles governing this case are discussed more at large in Weith & Avents v. City of Wilmington, 68 N. C.

Doe on Demise of Te-Gan-Tossee v. Rogers & Brown

9 N.C. 567 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1823

Wilson read an affidavit stating, that at Buncombe Superior Court, Spring term 1833, an action of eject-meat was tried between an Indian, named Te-gan-tos-see, ami Rogers & Brown, that there was a verdict and judgment for

Dailey v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

309 N.C. 710 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1983

However, the board may not use its expertise as a substitute for evidence in the record. (Citations omitted.) Accord, Wood v. Texas State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 615 S.W. 2d 942 (Tex. 1981); Dotson v. Tex. … State Bd. of Medical Exam., 612 S.W. 2d 921 (Tex. 1981); Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assur., 31 Cal. 3d 124 , 181 Cal. Rptr. 732 , 642 P. 2d 792 (1982); Farney v. Anderson, 14 Ill. Dec. 346 , 56 Ill.

State Ex Rel. County Board of Education v. Bateman

102 N.C. 52 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

State v. … Crumpler v. Governor, 1 Dev., 52 ; Governor v. Barr, ibid., 65, and Governor v. Matlock, 1 Dev., 214 . Chief Justice RinmN cited these cases in State v.

Brady v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

347 N.C. 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1998

Porter v. Durham

74 N.C. 767 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1876

State Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. Sutton

120 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

The Acts of 1889, Ch. 199, substituted the County Board of Education as re-lators (Board of Education v. Wall, 117 N. … C., 382 ), but Acts of 1895, Ch. 439, abolished the County Board of Education and again made the county commissioners the proper relators. Tillery v. Candler, 118 N. C., 888 . No Error.

Walker v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

369 N.C. 517 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2017

Berlin Iron Bridge Co. v. Board of Commissioners

111 N.C. 317 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892

Such an agreement on the part of the Board of Commissioners, without the concurrence of a majority of the Justices of the Peace, has been decided by this Court to be invalid, and imposes no constructual obligation upon the … Whether the defendant is excepted from the general principle, which forbids one to retain the fruits of a contract, and at the same time repudiate its obligation (Skinner v. Maxwell, 66 N. C., 45 , and Burns v.

North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

364 N.C. 102 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2010

Ass’n v. Bd. of Trs., 185 N.C. App. 518, 523 , 648 S.E.2d 859, 862 (2007). … The statute requires the State Board of Community Colleges to “make the necessary arrangements to carry out those provisions of Chapter 97” for its employees and authorizes the board of trustees of each community college

Wake Cares, Inc. v. Wake County Board of Education

363 N.C. 165 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 2009

See Bd. of Educ. v. Bd. of Cty. … See Bd. of Educ. v. Bd. of Cty.

Batdorff v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

356 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 2003