Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.78s
Graham & Son, Inc. v. Board of Education
287 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975
Cited 1 timesPublishedGalloway v. Board of Education of Brunswick County
184 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1922
Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., *248 300; Hammond v. McRae, 182 N. C., 747 . … Griffith v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 408 ; Allen v. Reidsville, 178 N. C., 513 ; Sasser v. Haurriss, 178 N. C., 322 ; Moore v. Monument Go., 166 N. 0., 211; Piclcler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., 221 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedWilliams v. North Carolina State Board of Education
266 N.C. 761 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 30, 1966
Decisions supporting the quoted statement and cited texts include the following; Lincoln Parish School Board v. … Paraphrasing the language of Brown, J., in Raleigh v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDover Lumber Co. v. Board of Commissioners
173 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1917
Cited 0 timesPublishedGay v. Wake County Board of Education
254 N.C. 622 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederal Paper Board Co. v. Kamyr, Inc.
328 N.C. 570 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1991
Cited 0 timesPublishedCobb v. Rocky Mount Board of Education
329 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1991
Cited 0 timesPublishedOscar Miller Contractor v. Tax Review Board
308 N.C. 677 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnderson v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
367 N.C. 802 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2014
Cited 0 timesPublishedRichards v. NORTH CAROLINA TAX REVIEW BOARD
652 S.E.2d 651 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 2007
652 S.E.2d 651 (2007) William Alexander RICHARDS, Jr., Taxpayer v. NORTH CAROLINA TAX REVIEW BOARD and E. Norris Tolson, Secretary of Revenue, North Carolina Department of Revenue. No. 329P07. … Youth, Assistant Attorney General, for Tax Review Board, et al. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 196 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedElks Lodge v. Board of Alcoholic Control
289 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1976
Cited 0 timesPublishedCraig v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
659 S.E.2d 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008
659 S.E.2d 439 (2008) Jon-Paul CRAIG, by his mother and next friend, Kimberly CRAIG v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, and Annette Register, in her Official and Individual Capacity. No. 484PA07. … Nash, Wilmington, for Board of Education. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 923 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedWilliams v. North Carolina State Board of Education
284 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1974
Supply Co., 150 N.C., 176 ; Beardsly v. Day, 52 Minn., 451 ; Smith v. Dall, 13 Cal., 510 .” In Jones v. … Phifer v. Barnhart, supra; Janney v. Blackwell, supra; Ray v. Wilcoxon, supra; Edwards v. Dickinson, supra; Austin v. King, supra; United States v. Hiawassee Lumber Co., supra.
Cited 13 timesPublishedRobinhood Trails Neighbors v. Board of Adjustment
299 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublishedFalls Sales Co. v. Board of Transportation
298 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublishedReid v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
241 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1955
truth of the facts alleged in the complaint, as is done when the sufficiency of a pleading to state a cause of action is challenged by demurrer, this basic and determinative question arises on this appeal: Did the Mayor and Board … Langley v. Taylor, post, 573. However, since this ease involves a matter of public interest- — -and the continuance of a restraining order — the Court deems it expedient to entertain this appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission
182 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1921
provided in section 4 of said act as follows: “The Mecklenburg Highway Commission shall be invested with all the road powers, and shall perform all the road duties which have heretofore been performed and exercised by the board … On 4 April, 1921, the Mecklenburg Highway Commission assumed jurisdiction and control of all road work'in Mecklenburg County which had theretofore been exercised by the county board of commissioners and the trustees of the
Cited 0 timesPublishedBattle v. President of the Literary Board
28 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1845
accounts of them, like other acts of the Board. … Besides, this Board could delegate no such authority to any one.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Water & Light Commissioners v. Chapman
151 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1909
Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 . … State v. Jones, at this term (where the delay was thirty-three days); Stroud v. Telegraph Co., 133 N. C., 253 ; Simmons v. Andrews, 106 N. C., 201 . Appellants are too often prone to forget that appellees have rights.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCannon v. N.C. State Board of Education
342 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1995
As to plaintiffs’ contention that the method of electing the merged school board is racially discriminatory, we conclude that the issue is not properly before this Court.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna