Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.78s

  • Graham & Son, Inc. v. Board of Education

    287 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Galloway v. Board of Education of Brunswick County

    184 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1922

    Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., *248 300; Hammond v. McRae, 182 N. C., 747 . … Griffith v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 408 ; Allen v. Reidsville, 178 N. C., 513 ; Sasser v. Haurriss, 178 N. C., 322 ; Moore v. Monument Go., 166 N. 0., 211; Piclcler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., 221 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Williams v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    266 N.C. 761 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 30, 1966

    Decisions supporting the quoted statement and cited texts include the following; Lincoln Parish School Board v. … Paraphrasing the language of Brown, J., in Raleigh v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dover Lumber Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    173 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1917

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gay v. Wake County Board of Education

    254 N.C. 622 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Federal Paper Board Co. v. Kamyr, Inc.

    328 N.C. 570 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of Education

    329 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oscar Miller Contractor v. Tax Review Board

    308 N.C. 677 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    367 N.C. 802 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richards v. NORTH CAROLINA TAX REVIEW BOARD

    652 S.E.2d 651 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 2007

    652 S.E.2d 651 (2007) William Alexander RICHARDS, Jr., Taxpayer v. NORTH CAROLINA TAX REVIEW BOARD and E. Norris Tolson, Secretary of Revenue, North Carolina Department of Revenue. No. 329P07. … Youth, Assistant Attorney General, for Tax Review Board, et al. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 196 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elks Lodge v. Board of Alcoholic Control

    289 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Craig v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    659 S.E.2d 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

    659 S.E.2d 439 (2008) Jon-Paul CRAIG, by his mother and next friend, Kimberly CRAIG v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, and Annette Register, in her Official and Individual Capacity. No. 484PA07. … Nash, Wilmington, for Board of Education. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 923 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Williams v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    284 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1974

    Supply Co., 150 N.C., 176 ; Beardsly v. Day, 52 Minn., 451 ; Smith v. Dall, 13 Cal., 510 .” In Jones v. … Phifer v. Barnhart, supra; Janney v. Blackwell, supra; Ray v. Wilcoxon, supra; Edwards v. Dickinson, supra; Austin v. King, supra; United States v. Hiawassee Lumber Co., supra.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Robinhood Trails Neighbors v. Board of Adjustment

    299 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Falls Sales Co. v. Board of Transportation

    298 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reid v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

    241 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1955

    truth of the facts alleged in the complaint, as is done when the sufficiency of a pleading to state a cause of action is challenged by demurrer, this basic and determinative question arises on this appeal: Did the Mayor and Board … Langley v. Taylor, post, 573. However, since this ease involves a matter of public interest- — -and the continuance of a restraining order — the Court deems it expedient to entertain this appeal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission

    182 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1921

    provided in section 4 of said act as follows: “The Mecklenburg Highway Commission shall be invested with all the road powers, and shall perform all the road duties which have heretofore been performed and exercised by the board … On 4 April, 1921, the Mecklenburg Highway Commission assumed jurisdiction and control of all road work'in Mecklenburg County which had theretofore been exercised by the county board of commissioners and the trustees of the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Battle v. President of the Literary Board

    28 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1845

    accounts of them, like other acts of the Board. … Besides, this Board could delegate no such authority to any one.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Water & Light Commissioners v. Chapman

    151 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1909

    Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 . … State v. Jones, at this term (where the delay was thirty-three days); Stroud v. Telegraph Co., 133 N. C., 253 ; Simmons v. Andrews, 106 N. C., 201 . Appellants are too often prone to forget that appellees have rights.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cannon v. N.C. State Board of Education

    342 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1995

    As to plaintiffs’ contention that the method of electing the merged school board is racially discriminatory, we conclude that the issue is not properly before this Court.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.