Case law

Constantian v. Anson County

244 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1956

Marshburn v. Brown, 210 N.C. 331 , 186 S.E. 265 . … Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 98 L. Ed. 873 , 74 S. Ct. 686 , 38 A.L.R. 2d 1180 ), and in its 1955 decision applied the proposition so declared to the cases before it (Brown v.

Ragland v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

369 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 2016

Brown v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

724 S.E.2d 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 2012

BROWN, Nancy L. Blackwood, Chad Brandon, Richard C. Cockerham, Carolyn M. Dawson, Trent William Duncan, Roger J. Hart, Lisa Hartrick, Kevin Harvell, Alan W. Hill, Adam Huffman, Chris Liv, John McRae McBryde, Roger V. … Steponkus, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v.

Eastern Outdoor, Inc. v. Board of Adjust.

356 N.C. 670 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 2003

Poole v. State Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners

221 N.C. 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1942

Person v. Houghton, 186 N. C., 723 , 120 S. E., 481 ; White v. Comrs. of Johnston County, 217 N. C., 329 , I S. E. (2d), 825, and cases there cited. See, also, Harris v. Board of Education, 216 N. C., 147 , 4 S. … E. (2d), 328 ; Champion v. Board of Health, ante, 96. Discretionary powers may not be controlled by mandamus. Harris v. Board of Education, supra.

Marsico v. New Hanover County Board of Education

368 N.C. 601 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2015

Koonce v. Board of Commissioners of Jones County

106 N.C. 192 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

The Code, §§ 766 and 2554; County Board of Education v. Bateman, 102 N C., 57. … In the case of Boner v. Auditor, 65 N.

Robinhood Trails Neighbors v. Board of Adjustment

299 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1980

Falls Sales Co. v. Board of Transportation

298 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1979

Reid v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

241 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1955

truth of the facts alleged in the complaint, as is done when the sufficiency of a pleading to state a cause of action is challenged by demurrer, this basic and determinative question arises on this appeal: Did the Mayor and Board … Langley v. Taylor, post, 573. However, since this ease involves a matter of public interest- — -and the continuance of a restraining order — the Court deems it expedient to entertain this appeal.

Board of Commissioners v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission

182 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1921

provided in section 4 of said act as follows: “The Mecklenburg Highway Commission shall be invested with all the road powers, and shall perform all the road duties which have heretofore been performed and exercised by the board … On 4 April, 1921, the Mecklenburg Highway Commission assumed jurisdiction and control of all road work'in Mecklenburg County which had theretofore been exercised by the county board of commissioners and the trustees of the

Cannon v. N.C. State Board of Education

342 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1995

As to plaintiffs’ contention that the method of electing the merged school board is racially discriminatory, we conclude that the issue is not properly before this Court.

Cannon v. N.C. State Board of Education

340 N.C. 109 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1995

Mallard v. Mallard

234 N.C. 654 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1951

Young v. Young, 225 N.C. 340 , 34 S.E. 2d 154 ; Moody v. Moody, 225 N.C. 89 , 33 S.E. 2d 491 ; Byers v. Byers, 222 N.C. 298 , 22 S.E. 2d 902 . … Byers v. Byers, supra.

Dare County Board of Education v. Sakaria

340 N.C. 567 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 27, 1995

Story v. Board of Commissioners of Alamance County

184 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922

IX, sec. 2; Riggsbee v. Durham, 94 N. C., 800 ; Puitt, v. Comrs., ibid., 709; Markham v. Manning, 96 N. C., 132 . Tbe plaintiff next contends that tbe election can be ordered, if at all,, only under the provisions of C. … In Weesner v. Davidson, 182 N.

Wilmington Railway Bridge Co. v. Board of Commissioners

72 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

Co. v. Commissioners of Brunswick . We do not think it was desired that we should pass on the liabilities to the payment of the tax as between the Bridge Company and its lessees, the railroad companies.

Carroll v. Warrenton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc.

259 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

In Mosteller v. … McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, § 851; Board of Trade v. Tobacco Co., 235 N.C. 737, 740 , 71 S.E. 2d 21 ; Ingle v.

Bunch v. N.C. Code Officials Qualifications Board

341 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1995

Britt v. N.C. State Board of Education

320 N.C. 790 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1987