Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.54s

  • Topping v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    249 N.C. 291 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 14, 1959

    Principally, it brought forward the provisions theretofore codified in Vol. 3A as G.S. 115-85 and considered in Brown v. … See Board of Education v. Allen, supra. Consequently, the condemnation proceedings must be considered as instituted under the provisions of G.S.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Newton v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    342 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1996

    In this civil action, plaintiff seeks damages in excess of $10,000 from the New Hanover County Board of Education on the basis of injuries sustained due to the Board’s negligence, through its agents and employees, in “procuring … In Hood v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.

    116 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895

    J.) in Belo v. Commissioners, 82 N. C., 415 ; Worth v. Railroad, (Ashe, J.) 89 N. C., 301 , 305. 1 Desty Tax., 348, 2 Thomp. Corp., 2810. Jones v. Davis, 35 Ohio St., 474 , 476, People v. Coleman, 126 N. Y., 433, 437 . … State v. Petway, 55 N. C., 396, 406 . “Especially is it important to distinguish a tax on shares of stock from tax on the capital stock,” says 1 Cook, supra, section 563 citing Porter v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sedberry v. . Board of Commissioners, Chatham County

    66 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1872

    It is settled State v. Jones, 1 Ired. 414 . … forbid the board from “levying the tax.”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Appeal by Harrell v. Midland Board of Adjustment

    369 N.C. 751 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2017

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sun Suites Holdings, LLC. v. Board of Aldermen

    353 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2000

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. Brown

    238 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1953

    Groves v. McDonald, 223 N.C. 150 , 25 S.E. 2d 387 ; Rousseau v. Bullis, 201 N.C. 12 , 158 S.E. 553 . See also 43 C.J.S., Injunctions, Sec. 246. … R. v. R. R., 237 N.C. 88 , 74 S.E. 2d 430 ; Clinard v. Lambeth, 234 N.C. 410 , 67 S.E. 2d 452 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCausland v. . Construction Co.

    172 N.C. 708 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1916

    On the trial it was made to appear that in July, 1914, the board of school commissioners of Concord, N.C. contracted with the Brown Construction Company to provide the material and labor for erection and completion of a public … Arthur Castle , 172 Ind. 97 , reported also in 42 L.R.A., U.S., 573, with note by the editor; Ocho v. Carnahan Co. , 42 Ind. App. 157 ; Brown v. Markland , 22 Ind. App. 652 ; Jordon v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. . Warren

    228 N.C. 22 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1947

    S. v. Walker, 226 N. C., 458 , 38 S. E. (2d), 531 ; S. v. Mays, 225 N. C., 486 , 35 S. E. (2d), 494 ; S. v. McLeod, 198 N. C., 649 , 152 S. E., 895 . … We find no error in tbe trial below as. to tbe defendant Odell Brown. Tbe judgment as to Eugene Warren is reversed. On Brown’s appeal — No error. On Warren’s appeal — Reversed.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Butner ex rel. Butner v. Brown Brothers Lumber Co.

    180 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920

    and about the machine at the time, Corliss Eishell, the foreman as stated, but now in the employment of others in the State of Pennsylvania, testified as follows: “In March or April, 1913, this boy, Earl Butner, came to Brown … Sawyer v. R. R., 142 N. C., 1 ; Vassor v. R. R., 142 N. C., 68 ; Daniel v. R. R., 136 N. C., 517 ; Howe v. Newmarch, 94 Mass., 49 ; Stone v. Pugh, 115 Tenn., 688 ; Schulwitz v. Lumber Co., 126 Mich., 559 ; Kiernan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hallyburton v. Board of Education of Burke County

    213 N.C. 9 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1938

    Burke County, through its board of county commissioners and at the request of the board of education, is negotiating a loan from the State Literary Fund in the sum of $37,000 for the purpose of erecting and equipping certain … The language of Article V, sec. 4, as it presently exists is unambiguous, plain and direct. Its terms are definite and certain.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Moore v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION

    661 S.E.2d 735 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

    661 S.E.2d 735 (2008) Alicia MOORE v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 503P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 10, 2008. Luke Largess, Charlotte, for Alicia Moore. H. … Landis Wade, Charlotte, Melissa Kidd, for Board of Education. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 649 S.E.2d 410 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

    265 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1965

    The Board members are not required to determine the controversy according to law, Poe & Sons, Inc. v. … Lusk v. Clayton, 70 N.C. 184 ; Robbins v. Killebrew, et al., 95 N.C. 19 .”

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Smith-Courtney Co. v. Board of Road Commissioners

    182 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1921

    Township for machinery, tools and equipment to be used, and which were used, by the board in the construction and improvement of the public roads of the said township, the board of road supervisors being authorized by statute … Garrett , 102 U.S. 472 ; O'Connor v. Memphis , 6 Lea 730 ; Wolf v. New Orleans, supra; Mobile v. Watson, supra; Amy v. Selma , 77 Ala. 103 . It was said in Port of Mobile v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lord & Polk Chemical Co. v. Board of Agriculture

    111 N.C. 135 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892

    This case differs from that of an action against agencies of the State which the Legislature has incorporated and expressly authorized to “ sue and be sued,” as in County Board v. State Board, 106 N. … Railroad v. Alsbrook, 110 N. C., 137 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Board of Financial Control v. County of Henderson

    208 N.C. 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1935

    In Bourne v. Board of Financial Control of Buncombe County, 207 N. … Co. v. Board of Comrs. of Carteret County, 75 N. C., 474 .” It will be noted that Atlantic & N. C. R. Co. case is cited. In Collector of Taxes of Milton v. City of Boston, 180 N. E.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Trustees of Watts Hospital v. Board of Commissioners

    231 N.C. 604 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1950

    Hospital v. Cone, ante, 292, 56 S.E. 2d 709 ; Redwine v. Clodfelter, 226 N.C. 366 , 38 S.E. 2d 203 ; Duffy v. Duffy, 221 N.C. 521 , 20 S.E. 2d 835 ; Penick v. Bank, 218 N.C. 686 , 12 S.E. 2d 253 ; Cutter v. … of commissioners of the county, or under the supervision of some officer, or board, or agency of the county designated by the board of commissioners pursuant to G.S. 131-126.21.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Mott v. Board of Commissioners of Forsyth County

    126 N.C. 866 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1900

    In Rhyne v. … Brown , 127 N.C. 563 ; Jones v. Riggs , 154 N.C. 282 . (885)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • North Carolina State Board of Education v. State

    368 N.C. 916 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eastern Outdoor, Inc. v. Board of Adjust.

    356 N.C. 670 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 2003

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.