Case law

Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of Education

258 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1963

The question for determination is this: Does the defendant Hamlet City Board of Education now own the lot in controversy in fee absolute, or did title thereto revert to the plaintiffs when the aforesaid Board of Education … Cannon v. Baker, 252 N.C. 111 , 113 S.E. 2d 44 ; Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95 , 92 S.E. 2d 682 ; Dull v. Dull, 232 N.C. 482 , 61 S.E. 2d 255 ; Ellis v. Barnes, 231 N.C. 543 , 57 S.E. 2d 772 ; Willis v.

Dare County Board of Education v. Sakaria

342 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1996

466 S.E.2d 717 (1996) 342 N.C. 648 DARE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body of politic and corporate, Plaintiff, v. Elpis SAKARIA, Defendant. DARE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body of politic and corporate, Plaintiff, v. … DARE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body of politic and corporate, Plaintiff, v. JERA ASSOCIATES, a Maryland Partnership, Defendant. DARE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body of politic and corporate, Plaintiff, v.

Brown v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.

131 N.C. 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1902

In Logan v. N. C. Railroad Co., 1 16 N. C., 940 , the matter was thoroughly discussed- and decided, and the opinion has been affirmed in numerous cases since. Tillett v. Railroad, 118 N. C., 1031 ; Benton v. … C., 1007 ; Perry v. Railroad, 128 N. C., 471 ; Harden v. Railroad, 129 N. C., 354 ; 55 L. R. A., 784; 85 Am. St. Rep., 747 . No Error.

Kindsgrab v. State Board of Barber Examiners

368 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2015

County of Rockingham v. Board of Trustees

219 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1941

In the case of Board of Financial Control v. Henderson County, 208 N. C., 569 , 181 S. … Davis v. Salisbury, 161 N. C., 56 , 76 S. E., 687 ; Corp. Com. v. Construction Co., 160 N. C., 582 , 76 S. E., 640 .

Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of Education

331 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 1992

On the authority of Reed v. Abrahamson, 331 N.C. 249 , 415 S.E.2d 549 (1992) (No. 230PA91, filed simultaneously herewith), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Wayne County Board of Education v. Lewis

231 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1950

Board of Education v. Pegram, 197 N.C. 33 , 147 S.E. 622 ; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N.C. 753 , 130 S.E. 621 . … Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 152 , 51 S.E. 2d 484 ; Board of Education v. Forrest, supra; School Commissioners v. Aldermen, 158 N.C. 191 , 73 S.E. 905 ; Venable v. School Committee, 149 N.C. 120 , 62 S.E. 902 .

Freeman v. Board of County Commissioners

221 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1942

Hill v. Ponder and Rice, ante, 58. … Rice by defendant Board was without authority and of no effect. Hence tbe order of tbe court below restraining defendant Board from making payment of public funds to John P. Rice as tax collector must be Affirmed.

Leahy v. North Carolina Board of Nursing

346 N.C. 775 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1997

See Thompson v. Wake County Bd. of Educ., 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E.2d 538 (1977). The first finding of fact about which the petitioner complains is the finding that she did not adequately document the treatment of Mr. … The Court of Appeals relied on Dailey v. N. C. State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 309 N.C. 710 , 309 S.E.2d 219 (1983), for this holding. We do not believe Dailey governs this case.

Coomer v. Lee County Board of Education

366 N.C. 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 23, 2012

Withers v. Board of County Commissioners

196 N.C. 535 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 23, 1929

This Court has adopted the prevailing construction of the constitutional provision in the case of Jenkins v. Board of Elections, 180 N. C., 169 . That case involved the constitutionality of the absentee voters law. … Boyer v. Teague, 106 N. C., 625 , 11 S. E., 665 . Tbe South Carolina Court in State ex rel. Birchmore v. State Board of Canvassers, 78 S.

Thomas v. State Board of Alcoholic Control

258 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1963

Thomas (licensee), trading as Thomas’ Food Store, was granted permits in 1949 by the State Board of Alcoholic Control (Board) to sell beer and wine for consumption on and off licensee’s business premises at 508 South Boundary … The Board appeals.

Board of Transportation v. Terminal Warehouse Corp.

300 N.C. 700 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1980

Eller v. Board of Education, 242 N.C. 584 , 89 S.E. 2d 144 (1955). … State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616 (1924).

Hoke County Board of Education v. State

366 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 2013

Clark Equipment Company v. Johnson

261 N.C. 269 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1964

Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101 , 97 S.E. 2d 486 . … Co. v. Trucking Co., 256 N.C. 721 , 125 S.E. 2d 25 . An assignment of error is not a substitute for an exception. Vance v. Hampton, 256 N.C. 557 , 124 S.E. 2d 527 ; Cratch v. Taylor, 256 N.C. 462 , 124 S.E. 2d 124 .

Mangum v. RALEIGH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

663 S.E.2d 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 2008

663 S.E.2d 314 (2008) Barbara Glover MANGUM, Terry Overton, Deborah Overton and Van Eure v. RALEIGH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PRS Partners, LLC, and RPS Holdings, LLC. No. 613PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Board of Commissioners v. Sidney Spitzer & Co.

173 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1917

Beneficient provision for the poor, the unfortunate, and orphan” is “one of the first duties of a civilized .and Christian State,” and in accordance with this spirit, which pervades the Constitution, it was held in Jones v … C., 579 , and affirmed in Keith v. Lockhart, 171 N. C., 451 , that the “support of the aged and infirm,” which is the designation given by statute to the poor of the county (Revisal, sec. 1327; Copple v. Comrs., 138 N.

Hoke County Board of Education v. State

366 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 2012

724 S.E.2d 510 (2012) HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Plaintiffs and Asheville City Board of Education, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. STATE of North Carolina; State Board of Education, Defendants. No. 5P12. … Exum, Jr., Greensboro, for State Board of Education.

Hoke County Board of Education v. State

367 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2013

Thompson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

366 N.C. 586 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 2013