Case law

Spain v. Brown

236 N.C. 355 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952

Truelove v. R. R., 222 N.C. 704 , 24 S.E. 2d 537 ; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . The only pleading on the part of the defendant is either a demurrer or an answer. G-.S. 1-124. … The rule which prohibits the incorporation of extraneous, evidential, irrelevant, impertinent, or scandalous matter in a complaint or answer, G.S. 1-153; Brown v. Hall, supra; Truelove v. R. R., supra; Parlier v.

State v. . Brown

76 N.C. 222 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

Luther v. Skeen, 8 Jones, 356 ; State v. Oscar, 7 Jones, *226 305. … State v. Johnson, 1 Winst., 238; State v. Smith, 2 Ire. 402.

Bell v. . Brown

227 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1947

Brown, from the option dated 25 September, 1943, and whether or not tbe signature of tbe defendant, Gladys B. Brown, to tbe option and lease, was obtained by false and fraudulent representations. … C., 321 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 112 N. C., 27 ; Holden v. Purefoy, 108 N. C., 163 ; Riley v. Jordan, 75 N. C., 180 ; Gorrell v. Alspaugh, 120 N. C., 362 .” Faust v. Rohr, supra; Public Utilities Co. v. Bessemer City, 173 N.

Brown v. State

370 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2017

State v. Brown

804 S.E.2d 520 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 2017

State v. . Brown

106 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

The validity of that act, and the sufficiency of an indictment drawn in accordance with it, were sustained by this Court in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743 . We cite that case and affirm it as to this point. No error.

Barnes v. . Brown

71 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

In Camp v. Cox, 1 D. & B., 62, it was held that a mortgagee cannot sell the equity of redemption under execution for the mortgage debt. It was doubted in that case, and also in Thompson v. … Albea v. Griffin, 2 D. & B. Eq., 9; Winton v. Fort, 5 Jones Eq., 251 .

Brown v. . Rickard

107 N.C. 639 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

Waugh v. Richardson, 8 Ired., 470 ; McCormick v. Monroe, 1 Jones, 13; Melton v. Monday, 64 N. C., 295 , throw light in this connection on the subject of void and valid exceptions in grants.

Purdy v. Brown

307 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1982

See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. … Couch v. Couch, 18 N.C. App. 108 , 196 S.E. 2d 64 (1973); State v. Johnson, 282 N.C. 1 , 191 S.E. 2d 641 (1972).

State v. Brown

250 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1959

In Ornoff v. … In City of New Orleans v.

Harrison v. . Brown

222 N.C. 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1943

Co. v. Carolina Beach, 216 N. C., 778 (789), 7 S. … Mortgage Co. v. Winston-Salem, 216 N. C., 126 , 6 S. E. (2d), 501 . Tbe general rule is stated in 8 Am.

Roughton v. . Brown

53 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1861

See 2nd Tidd’s Practice, 1186, and Lassiter v. Harper, 10 Ire. 392. 2. … Raymond, 71, Oarth. 8 ; Sharpe v.

State v. Brown

249 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1958

In S. v. … Burnett v. R.R., 120 N.C. 517 , 26 S.E. 819 , cited in numerous later cases. See Shepherd’s Annotations. See also Gregg v. Mallett, 111 N.C. 74 , 15 S.E. 936 ; S. v. McKinney, 111 N.C. 683 , 16 S.E. 235 ; S. v.

Lea v. . Brown

56 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

Brown nor his successor were the *147 objects of the testator’s bounty, and were but “nominal do-nees.” Sorry v. Bright, 1 Dev. and Bat. Eq. 113. … In Pippin v. Ellison, supra, and Lowe v.

Brown v. Hodges

232 N.C. 537 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1950

Reed v. Shenck, supra; Gause v. Perkins, supra. … Cherry v. Slade, 7 N.C. 82; Hill v. Dalton, supra; Bowen v. Lumber Co., 153 N.C. 366 , 69 S.E. 258 .

Brown v. . Polk

201 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1931

Hawkins v. Hughes, 87 N. C., 115 . The causes of action are different in the two suits. … Nothing was said in Construction Co. v. Ice Co., 190 N. C., 580 , 130 S. E., 165 , or Allen v. Salley, 179 N. C., 147 , 101 S. E., 545 , which militates against our present position. Affirmed.

Brown v. . Hobbs

147 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1908

In Trowbridge v. … See, also, Stone v. Dennison, 13 Pick., 1 , and. Page v. Monks, 5 Gray, 492 . The same state of facts appeared in Miller v.

State v. Brown

794 S.E.2d 338 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 2016

State v. Brown

795 S.E.2d 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2017

Chavis v. . Brown

174 N.C. 122 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917

Cox v. Boyden, 167 N. C., 320 ; Massie.v. Hainey, 165 N. C., 174 ; Bank v. Ewen, 160 N. C., 414 ; Roberts v. Pratt, 152 N. C., 731 . … Bank v. McEwen, 160 N. C., 414 -423; Morris v. Grier, 76 N. C., 410 ; Moye v. Cogdell, 69 N. C., 93 .