Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.80s

  • Loughlin v. Board of Registration

    292 N.C. 467 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Lamm

    276 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wolfenden v. Board of Commissioners

    152 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1910

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eshon v. Board of Commissioners

    95 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

    Warren deposited with me, notes, amounting to $219.94, payable to himself, secured by mortgage on real estate, and verbally instructed me to hold them, as security for the costs of the appeal, in the case of Eshon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Board of Commissioners

    152 N.C. 663 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910

    Brown, J. As we construe the act to improve the public roads in Yalleytown Township in Cherokee County, ch. 210, Laws 1905, this proceeding cannot be maintained. … We agree with his Honor that the mandamus is sought to enforce a money demand, but in our opinion it is not a money demand payable from the general funds of Cherokee County, and a mandamus will not lie against its board of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore Cty. ex rel. Evans v. Brown

    353 N.C. 728 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2001

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duggins v. Board of Examiners

    287 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Brittain

    342 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Latta

    342 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Board of Drainage Commissioners

    156 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1911

    Sanderlin v. Lukin, 152 N. C., 744 . … Durrett v. Davison. (Ky.), 8 L. R. A. (N. S.), 546, and cases cited in the notes thereto. Affirmed. Hoke, J., concurs in the result.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kenan v. Board of Adjustment

    281 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1972

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meacham v. Board of Education

    307 N.C. 577 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Revis

    297 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eggimann v. Board of Education

    285 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crawford v. Board of Education

    275 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1969

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. LeMay

    192 N.C. 810 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bizzell v. Board of Aldermen

    192 N.C. 364 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1926

    In Eleanor Bizzell v. … Board of Aldermen, ante, 348, we said: “We do not think that the reference in the pleadings to the acts of the city planning commission of the city of Goldsboro enters into this controversy, although it may be noted that

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patterson v. Board of Commissioners

    170 N.C. 503 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1915

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crump v. Board of Education

    333 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1992

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Blickensderfer

    342 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.