Case law

Gibson v. Board of Commissioners

163 N.C. 510 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1913

In Quinn v. Lattimore, 120 N.

Sinclair, Owens Brown v. . State of N.C.

69 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

We have no hesitation, following the authority of Ward v. Maryland, 12 Wallace 418, in declaring the provision of the Act of 1868-69, chap. 108, under which this tax was collected, unconstitutional.

Hill v. Board of Commissioners

190 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925

In Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. … S. v. Kelly, 186 N. C., 365 , and cases there cited.

Board of Commissioners v. Scales

171 N.C. 523 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1916

Brooks v. Austin, 94 N. C., 222 ; Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N. C., 163 ; and especially Clark v. Peebles, 120 N. … Scott v. Life Assn., 137 N. C., 516 ; Dell School v. Peirce, 163 N. C., 424 ; S. v. White, 164 N. C., 408 .

Brown v. M & J Finance Corporation

269 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1967

Brown and wife Sophia Brown on the 10th day of January, 1962, to Leslie G. … This is said in Worley v.

Sentelle v. . Board of Education

198 N.C. 389 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1930

Johnson v. Finch, 93 N. C., 205 ; Warlick v. Lowman, 103 N. C., 122, 126 ; Wright v. Ins. Co., 138 N. C., 488 ; Eddleman v. Lentz, 158 N. C., 65 . … S. v. Davis, 15 N. C., 612 ; S. v. May, ibid., 328; S. v. Collins, 93 N. C., 564 ; S. v. Crane, 110 N. C., 530 ; Toole v. Toole, 112 N. C., 153 ; S. v. Flemming, 130 N. C., 688 ; Stephenson v. Raleigh, 178 N.

Hare v. . Board of Education

113 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

This Court, in S. v. … Hopkins v. Bowers , 111 N.C. 175 ; S. v. Jacobs , 51 N.C. 284 . There is No error. Cited: Cogdell v. R. R. , 130 N.C. 326 ; Ferrall v. Ferrall , 153 N.C. 176 ; Johnson v. Board of Ed. , 166 N.C. 473 . (16)

Berrier v. Board of Commissioners

186 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1923

Tbe act by wbicb tbe Legislature repealed tbe special tax voted in tbe consolidated district was ratified on 2 March, 1923, and on 9 March, during tbe February term, bis Honor signed tbe judgment in Evans v'. … Tbe plaintiff insists that tbe General Assembly bad no legal right to abolish or repeal tbe special tax, and that tbe county board of education abused its discretion in forming tbe consolidated district.

Halifax Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Brown

367 N.C. 288 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 23, 2014

Casey v. . Board of Education

219 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1941

Code of 1939 [Micbie], 8081 [ppp]); Early v. Basnight & Co., 214 N. C., 103 , 198 S. E., 577 ; Saunders v. Allen, 208 N. C., 189 , 179 S. E., 754 ; Buchanan v. Highway Commission, 217 N. C., 173 , 7 S. E. (2d), 382 . … Early v. Basnight & Co., supra.

Waters v. Board of Commissioners

186 N.C. 719 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923

S. v. Perkins, 141 N. C., 797 ; Comrs. v. Henderson, 163 N. C., 114 ; S. v. Kelly, ante, 365. For like reason it cannot be said that the act of 1915 is repealed by implication by the Municipal Finance Act of 1921. … Perry v. Comrs., 148 N. C., 521 ; Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 155 ; Hollowell v. Borden, 148 N. C., 256 .

Thomas v. . Board of Pharmacy

152 N.C. 373 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1910

The board was therefore not authorized to accept the $2 and renew a license which had been revoked. … Upon conviction .of felony, the right to vote is forfeited (S . v. Jones, 82 N. C., 685 ), and can only be restored in consequence of an act of the Legislature, and in a method therein prescribed. Rev., 2675-2680.

Ollis v. . Board of Education

210 N.C. 489 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1936

King v. Hobbs, 139 N. … Peacock v. Barnes, 142 N. C., 215 ; Stubbs v. Motz, 113 N. C., 458 .”

Flake v. Board of Commissioners

192 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1926

The plan was duly adopted by the board of education in Anson County on 21 July, 1924. Harrington v. Comrs., 189 N. C., 572 . … Miller v. School District, 184 N. C., 191 . See, also, Newsom, v. Earnheart, 86 N. C., 391 ; DeBerry v. Nicholson, 102 N. C., 465 ; Davis v. Board of Education, 186 N. C., 227 ; Plott v. Comrs., 187 N. C., 125 . 2.

Broadhurst v. Board of Commissioners

195 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1928

In O’Neal v. Mann, 193 N. … Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co., 172 N. C., 529 ; *445 Cobb v. Rhea, 137 N. C., 295 ; Cowles v. Cowles, 121 N. C., 276 ; Henry v. Hilliard, 120 N. C., 487 ; Alexander v. Alexander, 120 N. C., 474 ; May v.

Beaufort County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners

362 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

discretionary review is allowed with respect to the following issues: In light of Article IX, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution, is the statutory framework for resolving school funding disputes between the county board … of education and the county board of commissioners constitutional?

Beauforth County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners

661 S.E.2d 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

discretionary review is allowed with respect to the following issues: In light of Article IX, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution, is the statutory framework for resolving school funding disputes between the county board … of education and the county board of commissioners constitutional?

Gregg v. Board of Commissioners

162 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1913

As thus understood, the amendment falls within the principle declared in Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 351 ; Commissioners v. Stafford, 138 N. C., 453 ; Bank v. Lacy, 151 N. C., 3 . … Commissioners v. Stafford, 138 N. C., at p. 455 .

Trayford v. North Carolina Psychology Board

360 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2006

Fields Ex Rel. Fields v. Brown

205 N.C. 543 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1934

Brown, owned a truck. He directed his son, a boy less than sixteen years of age, to take the truck *544 and'carry Peter Williams and Tom Davis to.Warrenton. Tbe plaintiff was riding in tbe truck as a guest. … Eller v. Dent, 203 N. C., 439 , 166 S. E., 330 . There are certain exceptions to tbe charge, but they are not sustained as tbe instructions are fully warranted by tbe decisions in Eller v. Dent, supra, and Dreher v.