Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmspb

7,869 results

0.34s

  • Sevgi Cook v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 16, 2022

    Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Brown v. General Services Administration, No. 2021-1996, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2 (Fed. Cir. … Brown, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Paul D. Jonson v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

    2015 MSPB 36 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 4, 2015

    ); Samble v. … Gomez-Burgos v. Department of Defense, 79 M.S.P.R. 245, ¶ 10 (1998) (observing that the Board and EEOC are coequal in the mixed-case process); cf. Cloutier v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marco A. Romero v. United States Postal Service

    2014 MSPB 76 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 24, 2014

    ANALYSIS ¶5 As the Board recently discussed in Bean v. U.S. Postal Service, 120 M.S.P.R. 397 (2013), and Abbott v. U.S. … The Board reversed, noting that in Pittman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 832 F.2d 598, 599-600 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sandra M. Ayers v. Department of the Army

    2015 MSPB 58 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 2, 2015

    The appeal was dismissed without prejudice twice pending the Board’s decision in Day v. … Armstrong v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ilan Fouks v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2015 MSPB 37 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 22, 2015

    See Simmons v. … Generally, a reduction in grade that an employee accepts voluntarily is not within the Board’s jurisdiction. Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 114 M.S.P.R. 239, ¶ 8 (2010); see Elmore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • David O. Rassenfoss v. Department of the Treasury

    2014 MSPB 68 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 22, 2014

    See, e.g., Beck v. … McKinney v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Teresa L. Ruckman v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2025

    See Clemens v. … Brown v. Department of the Interior, 121 M.S.P.R. 205, ¶ 18 (2014), overruled on other grounds by Haas, 2022 MSPB 36; see Douglas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ricky N. Dawson v. Department of Agriculture

    2014 MSPB 67 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 21, 2014

    In Cleveland Board of Education v. … Walls v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 29 F.3d 1578, 1582 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (“‘broad equitable principles of justice and good conscience’ should be applied in good cause determinations”) (quoting Alonzo v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Walter M. Brown v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 30, 2016

    Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, MSPB Docket No. DA-844E-15-0398-I-1, Initial Appeal File (IAF), Tab 1. … . ¶3 On March 14, 2016, the appellant filed a petition for enforcement of the Board’s final decision seeking damages of “3 x 1,000,000,000 for everyday past the decision of the judgment.” Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Barbara R. King v. Department of the Air Force

    2015 MSPB 41 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 10, 2015

    See King v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Board have held that Congress intended to provide for the recovery of consequential damages. See Bohac v. Department of Agriculture, 239 F.3d 1334, 1338-39 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sevgi Cook v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 16, 2022

    Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Brown v. General Services Administration, No. 2021-1996, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2 (Fed. Cir. … Brown, 2022 WL 2354499, at *2.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kenneth G. Mastrullo v. Department of Labor

    2015 MSPB 67 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 31, 2015

    Wynn v. U.S. … Schnell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sean Nikkila v. Department of Energy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 21, 2022

    v. … Cir. 2009). 6 (1990)); see Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 110 M.S.P.R. 381, ¶ 10 (2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • William Lantis v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 20, 2025

    As the administrative judge correctly found, such a rescission divests the Board of jurisdiction over the appeal. See Campbell v. Office of Personnel Management , 123 M.S.P.R. 240, ¶ 7 (2016); Brown v. … See Fletcher v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richard L. Miller v. Office of Personnel Management

    2016 MSPB 44 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 20, 2016

    The Board also has recognized that the Handbook lacks the force of law, but is entitled to deference in proportion to its “power to persuade.” Warren v. … Russo v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Patrick W. Ryan v. Department of Homeland Security

    2016 MSPB 7 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 4, 2016

    Fontes v. … Wilson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John J. Carroll v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 12, 2016

    Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, 91 M.S.P.R. 314, 318 (2002); Tines v. Department of the Air Force, 56 M.S.P.R. 90, 93 (1992). … McBride v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richard L. Miller v. Office of Personnel Management

    2016 MSPB 44 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 20, 2016

    The Board also has recognized that the Handbook lacks the force of law, but is entitled to deference in proportion to its “power to persuade.” Warren v. … Russo v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Taylor M. Sharpe v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 20, 2015

    See Mahoney v. U.S. Postal Service, 37 M.S.P.R. 146, 149 (1988). … See Stewart v. U.S. Postal Service, 73 M.S.P.R. 104, 107 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kelby Yoon v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 12, 2023

    Veterans Administration, 5 M.S.P.R. 280 (1981), does 6 not apply. 3 Brown v. … See Brown, 121 M.S.P.R. 205, ¶ 19.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.