Case law

Leonard v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society

665 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 1987

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Bennett v.

Proffitt v. Ciccone

371 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 1973

A speculation of the threat is insufficient to justify deprivation of the right, Brown v. McGinnis, 10 N.Y.2d 531 , 255 N.Y.S.2d 497 , 18 [180] N.E.2d 791 (1962); Theriault v. Carlson, Supra [ 339 F.Supp. 375 ]. “3. … United States v. Zelker, 477 F.2d 797 (2d Cir. 1973); Parnell v. Wainwright, 464 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1972); Johnson v. Wainwright, 456 F.2d 1200 (5th Cir. 1972); see also, Bridwell v.

Brizendine v. Swenson

302 F. Supp. 1011 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 11, 1969

Brown’s comment in Floyd v. … People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 811 (1963); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Coppedge v.

Chambly v. Freeman

478 F. Supp. 1221 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 1979

Shea v. Vialpando, supra; See also, Anderson v. Graham, 492 F.2d 986 (8th Cir. 1973); Perez v. Chang, 438 F.Supp. 238 (D.Haw.1977); Fones v. Percy, No. 78-C-191 (W.D. … See, Shea v. Vialpando, supra, and Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 , 94 S.Ct. 1372 , 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974).

Allendale Mutual Insurance v. Crist

731 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 1989

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Ainsworth v. General Reinsurance Corp., 751 F.2d 962, 965 (8th Cir.1985). In O’Hare v.

Link v. K-Mart Corp.

689 F. Supp. 982 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1988

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Johnson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 745 S.W.2d at 662 the court stated: In Dake [v.

Thurman v. Berryhill

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 8, 2019

See Brown v. … See Brown v. Colvin, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59088, at *10-11 (W.D. Mo.

United States v. Empire Gas Corporation

393 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 6, 1975

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320, 327 , 81 S.Ct. 623, 628 , 5 L.Ed.2d 580 (1961); Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336 (1962); United States v.

Smith v. Kitterman, Inc.

897 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 24, 1995

Hall v. U.S. … We had to put boards together, electronic boards. * * * ‡ * Q. Okay. To do this job, did you need to use small hand tools? A. I had to use like little pliers. Karen Smith Dep. at 32-33. 5 . Q.

United States v. Kahn

373 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 5, 1973

Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 382 U.S. 70 , 86 S.Ct. 194 , 15 L.Ed.2d 165 (1965). As stated in Heligman v. … California v. Byers, supra.

Storlie v. United States

255 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1966

He cites supporting authority in Pilkington v. United States, 315 F.2d 204 (4th Cir. 1963); United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205 (1952); and Rawls v. … Stephens v. Harris, 358 F.2d 301 (8th Cir.1966); Weber v. Steele, 191 F.2d 815 (8th Cir.1951); Haynes v. Harris, 344 F.2d 463 (8th Cir.1965); Burdette v. Settle, 296 F.2d 687 (8th Cir. 1961); Smith v.

Jewell

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 20, 2025

Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984) (“One who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles to excuse that lack of diligence.”); and Heideman v.

Miller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.

808 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 1992

Biscoe v. Kowalski, 290 S.W.2d 133, 138 (Mo. banc 1956); Quick v. All Tel Missouri, Inc., 694 S.W.2d 757, 759 (Mo.App.1985). … Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.”

Odom v. Nash

226 F. Supp. 855 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 27, 1964

Petitioner contends that under the case of Rideau v. … Petitioner also contends that the case of Irvin v.

Riggs v. Gibbs

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 2017

Kurtz v. … Finally, with respect to the claims against the Board in Count V, defendants argue that sovereign immunity applies and that the Board cannot be held liable on a theory of respondeat superior.

Meyer Ex Rel. Wyrick v. Litwiller

749 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 5, 1990

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Wise v. Pea Ridge School District, 855 F.2d 560, 564 (8th Cir.1988) (quoting Metzger v.

Missouri Professional Liability Insurance v. American Casualty Co.

760 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 20, 1991

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Wichman v.

Sturdevant v. Settle

192 F. Supp. 534 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 15, 1961

Hawk v. Olson, 8 Cir., 130 F.2d 910, 913 . … Justice Whittaker in Hopkins v. Steele, Warden, Case No. 10391 of this Court. In Greenwood v. United States, 8 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 376, 387 , the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, en banc, speaking through Judge John B.

Catlett v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

589 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 26, 1984

In Eisen v. … In Meadows v.

D.A. v. Circle of Hope Girls Ranch and Boarding School

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 28, 2024

Doe v. United States, 210 F. Supp. 3d 1169, 1173 (W.D. Mo. 2016). … Doe v. New Prime, Inc., No. 6:23-CV-03278-RK, 2024 WL 623932, at *2 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 12, 2024) (quoting L.A. v. Gary Crossley Ford, Inc., No. 4:20-00620-CV-RK, 2020 WL 5880970, at *1 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2020).