Case law

Childs v. Brummett

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 2021

White v. … of the Board and Smith themselves.

Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

415 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 25, 1976

See, for example, Getty Oil Co. v. Ruckelshaus, id.; West Penn Power Co. v. … Under the Selective Service Act, a registrant is barred by statute from contesting his classification by the local board, the appeal board or the President, in a civil action for judicial review.

United States ex rel. Kirby v. Southern Constructors, Inc.

211 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 11, 1962

Defendants rely on 1 Am.Jur.2d Accord and Satisfaction § 18; § 1279 of Corbin on Contracts (1 vol. ed.); Lightfoot and Son v. Edward Hurd and Co. (1905), 113 Mo.App. 612 , 88 S.W. 128 ; H. C. … Pollman and Brothers Coal and Sprinkling Co. v. St. Louis (1898), 145 *539 Mo. 651 , 47 S.W. 563 ; and St. Joseph School Board v. Hull (1897), 72 Mo.App. 403 .

Storlie v. United States

255 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1966

He cites supporting authority in Pilkington v. United States, 315 F.2d 204 (4th Cir. 1963); United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205 (1952); and Rawls v. … Stephens v. Harris, 358 F.2d 301 (8th Cir.1966); Weber v. Steele, 191 F.2d 815 (8th Cir.1951); Haynes v. Harris, 344 F.2d 463 (8th Cir.1965); Burdette v. Settle, 296 F.2d 687 (8th Cir. 1961); Smith v.

United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.

619 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 2, 1985

Brown v. Georgeoff, supra. The court found no authority for such a position in its analysis of . … Gray specifically distinguished Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co., 295 U.S. 330 , 55 S.Ct. 758 , 79 L.Ed. 1468 (1935) and Allied Structural Steel Co. v.

Thornsberry v. Berryhill

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 21, 2018

Brown v. Astrue, No. 4:09-CV-274–DJS, 2010 WL 889835, at *25 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 8, 2010); see Depover v. … Hayes v. Astrue, No. 2:11-CV-04132-NKL, 2012 WL 393406, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 6, 2012); Schuler v. Astrue, No. 07-3360-CV-S-JCE- SSA, 2009 WL 613556, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 9, 2009); Brown v.

H. T. Poindexter & Sons Merchandise Co. v. United States

40 F. Supp. 787 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 18, 1941

In the case of Luzier’s Inc., v. … Co. v. United States, 33 F.Supp. 801, 803 .

Konigsberg v. Hunter

308 F. Supp. 1361 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 23, 1970

Marshal; Koch v. Zuieback, 194 F.Supp. 651 (S.D.Cal.1961), aff’d 316 F.2d 1 , local draft board officials; Bowman v. White, 388 F.2d 756 (4th Cir. 1968), a county agent for the FHA; Scherer v. … Norton v. McShane, supra; Howard v. Lyons, supra; Scherer v. Brennan, supra.

Electrical & Magneto Service Co. v. AMBAC International Corp.

745 F. Supp. 1501 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 17, 1990

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Wright-Moore Corp. v.

Boles v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 29, 2023

Richardson v. BNSF Ry. … See Olson v. Nat’l Ass’n of Sec.

Chambly v. Freeman

478 F. Supp. 1221 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 1979

Shea v. Vialpando, supra; See also, Anderson v. Graham, 492 F.2d 986 (8th Cir. 1973); Perez v. Chang, 438 F.Supp. 238 (D.Haw.1977); Fones v. Percy, No. 78-C-191 (W.D. … See, Shea v. Vialpando, supra, and Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 , 94 S.Ct. 1372 , 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974).

Jobst v. Richardson

358 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 11, 1973

Morris v. Richardson, 346 F.Supp. 494 (N.D.Ga., 1972), and Bartley v. … . § 460(b)(3), which purported to preclude judicial review of Selective Service Board actions.

Tinsley v. Kemp

750 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 3, 1990

Romney, 448 F.2d 731, 735 (7th Cir.1971); United States v. Yonkers Board of Ed., 594 F.Supp. 466, 469 (S.D.N.Y.1984). Plaintiffs oppose the motion to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds. … United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, [supra ], 837 F.2d 1181, 1217 (2d Cir.1987); Robinson, 610 F.2d at 1036-38; Resident Advisory Board v.

Trapp v. Gunn

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 18, 2021

Centifanti v. … See Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 516-17 (11088); Dunham v.

Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. New Prime, Inc.

250 F. Supp. 2d 1151 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 17, 2001

Sandoval v. Hagan, 197 F.3d 484 (11th Cir.1999). … Ass’n, Inc. v.

North Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States

384 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 27, 1975

See, e. g., Rodriguez v. … School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia, 338, F.Supp. 67 (E.D.Va.1972), reversed, 462 F.2d 1058 (4th Cir. 1972), affirmed, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973), reh. denied, 414 U.

Woolford v. Ashland, Missouri, City of

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 31, 2020

v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 492 F.3d 986, 995 (8th Cir. 2007). … See Greiman v. Hodges, 79 F. Supp. 3d 933, 945– 46 (S.D.

Allen Family Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.

525 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1981

However, the Supreme Court in Agins v. … See, e. g., Haczela v. City of Bridgeport, 299 F.Supp. 709 (D.Conn.1969); Foster v. City of Detroit, Michigan, 254 F.Supp. 655 (E.D.Mich. 1966); Drakes Bay Land Company v.

Rimson v. Amazon.com, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 25, 2023

Plaintiff went through the on-boarding process with Precise in February 2020. (Id. at ¶ 26.) … Wierman v. Casey’s Gen. Stores, 638 F.3d 984, 993 (8th Cir. 2011); see Roxas v.

United States v. Independent Stave Co., Inc.

406 F. Supp. 886 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 30, 1975

air stream as dust, but fell to the floor, in such quantities that it was shoveled up, hauled away and used as the sole fuel for the main steam boiler of the plant, and the surplus was trucked away and sold to a particle board … S-V. This method of determination is termed a “material balance” method, as opposed to “stack testing.”