Case law

American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. BoKim

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 30, 2021

American Family relies on Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company v. Brown et al., Case No. 19-654-GAF. (Doc. 9-1). … to Brown.

375 Slane Chapel Road, LLC v. Stone County, Missouri

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 24, 2023

See Data Mfg., Inc. v. … Cottrell v. 1 Defendants also argue that abstention is warranted under the Pullman abstention doctrine, Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman, 312 U.S. 496 (1941); and the Burford abstention doctrine, Burford v.

Stock v. Gray

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 22, 2023

v. City of Springfield, 923 F.3d 508, 509 n.2 (2019) (quoting Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310, 331 (2010)). … (quoting Doe v. Reed, 561 U.S. 186, 194 (2010)).

Lee v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

509 F. Supp. 1182 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 18, 1981

Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education, 585 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 932 , 99 S.Ct. 2053 , 60 L.Ed.2d 66 (1979); Richerson v. Jones, 551 F.2d 918 (3rd Cir. 1977); Pearson v. … Vandalia Butler Board of Education, 585 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 932 , 99 S.Ct. 2053 , 60 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); Richerson v. Jones, 551 F.2d 918 (3rd Cir. 1977); Pearson v.

Gromacki v. Armour & Co.

76 F. Supp. 752 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 22, 1948

Weitzman v. Weitzman, Mo., 156 S.W.2d 906 . … State ex rel. v. Musick, 145 Mo.App. 33 , 130 S.W. 398 . *755 Again, the essential elements of the fraud and deceit must be alleged and strictly proved. Equitable Life Ins. Co. v.

Wilson v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.

300 F. 185 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 15, 1924

In White v. Ewing, supra, Mr. Justice Brown said: . … Co. v. Newport News & O. P. Ry. & Elec. Co. (C. C.) 131 Fed. 534 ; Gunby v. Armstrong, 133 Fed. 417 , 66 C. C. A. 627 ; Robinson v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins. Co. (C.

Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville

19 F.2d 159 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 4, 1927

It is further charged that the city of Har-risonville, acting through its duly constituted board of aldermen and under color of the laws of the state of Missouri, on or about the 7th day of June, 1926, enacted an ordinance … Greenwood v. Nolan, 108 Minn. 170 , 122 N. W. 255 ; State v. Mercer, 132 Md. 263 ) 103 A. 570 ; Commonwealth v. Snyder, 182 Pa. 630 , 38 A. 356 ; City of Elgin v. Winchester, 300 Ill. 214 , 133 N. E. 205 , 22 A. L.

United States v. 518.77 Acres of Land

545 F. Supp. 1246 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 30, 1982

See Scully v. … Sunline, Inc., 423 F.2d 260 (8th Cir. 1970); John Deere Co. v. Short, 378 S.W.2d 496 (Mo. 1964); Brown v.

Lenroot v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.

55 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 28, 1944

The complaint was dismissed, Brown v. Hecht Co., D.C., 49 F. Supp. 528 . The Court of Appeals, however, 137 F.2d 689 , reversed the lower court. … Co. v. Local Great Falls Lodge of I.

United States v. Civella

493 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 14, 1980

Brown, 535 F.2d 424, 429 (8th Cir. 1976). There is also ample precedent for a sua sponte transfer by the trial court from one division to another. For example, in United States v. … See also United States v.

St. Joseph Ry., Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Public Service Commission

268 F. 267 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 10, 1920

Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 111 Atl. 729 , still further elaborates this view, citing Lincoln Gas Co. v. Lincoln, 250 U. S. 256 , 39 Sup. Ct. 454, 63 L. Ed. 968 , in support of its conclusions. … In Lincoln Gas Co. v.

Premier Bank v. Tierney

114 F. Supp. 2d 877 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 27, 2000

.”); Zipper v. … Co. v.

Pulido v. Cavazos

728 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 21, 1989

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Accord Montana v. … Board of Education of Monroe-Woodberry Central School District, 659 F.Supp. 1450, 1461 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (court notes “grossly disproportionate” test of Schmidt); Bennett v.

T.S.H. v. Northwest Missouri State University

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 23, 2019

See Brown v. Golden Valley, 574 F.3d 491, 499 (8th Cir. 2009) (citations omitted); Bradford, 330 F.3d at 1041 (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982)). … Brown, 574 F.3d at 499 (quoting Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 739 (2002)). There does not need to be a case finding the same conduct was unlawful. Id.

Diamond v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 9, 2017

Brown v. Diversified Distribution Sys., LLC, 801 F.3d 901, 907 (8th Cir. 2015) (quotations and citations omitted). … Brown, 801 F.3d at 908.

Withers v. United States Postal Service

417 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 13, 1976

See, e. g., Shaw v. Postal Service, Civil Action No. 20478-2 (W.D.Mo. 1976), and Thornburgh v. Postal Service, Civil Action No. 20656-2 (W.D.Mo. 1976). … See, e. g., Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 392 F.Supp. 71 (C.D.Calif. 1975); and Marsden v. United States Postal Service, 390 F.Supp. 329 (D. Minn. 1974).

United States v. Boyer

85 F. 425 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 1898

Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, 154 U. S. 210 , 14 Sup. Ct. 1087, Mr. Justice Brown said: “Congress has no power to interfere with police regulations relating exclusively to the internal trade of ,the states (U. S. v. … Pearson, supra, Gibbons v. Ogden, supra, and Brown v.

May Coal & Grain Co. v. Kansas City

10 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 18, 1935

Jell-O Co. v. Brown (D. C.) 3 F. Supp. 132, 133 . 4. According to the evidence, the plaintiff had an established business at Dodson, one-half mile from the city limits. … In the case of Williams v.

Cheadle v. North Platte R-1 School District

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 16, 2021

Brown v. Ent. Merchants Ass'n, 564 U.S. 786, 794 (2011). However, “the First Amendment rights of students in the public schools are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings.” … As a result, the court “[found] that the school board regulation at issue [was] rationally related to the board's interest in deterring alcohol consumption among students.” Id.

Missouri Ex Rel. Camden County v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.

42 F.2d 692 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 18, 1930

Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U. S. 211 , 20 S. Ct. 96 , 44 L. Ed. 136 ; Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1 , loc. cit. 229, 6 L. Ed. 23 ; Alabama Power Co. v. Gulf Power Co. (D. … In Sewell v.