Case law

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hickman Mills Consolidated School District No. 1

99 F. Supp. 2d 1070 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 24, 2000

The Board of Education of the Harborfields Central School District of Greenlawn, 136 F.3d 104, 112-113 (2nd Cir.1998); EEOC v. Crown Point Community School Corp., 1997 WL 54747 *6-7 (N.D.Ind.1997). … The Eighth Circuit has ruled that school boards are not entitled to the immunity provided by the eleventh amendment. Miener v. State of Missouri, 673 F.2d 969, 980 (8th Cir.1982).

Donnelly Garment Co. v. Dubinsky

47 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 19, 1942

Interstate Refineries, Inc., v. Barry [8 Cir], 7 F.2d 548, 550 ; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Gilliland [9 Cir.], 193 F. 608 ; Fitchburg R. Co. v. Nichols [1 Cir.], 85 F. 869 ; Maddox v. … Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, supra; Dollar S. S. Lines, Inc., v. Merz, supra; Schuerholz v. Roach, 4 Cir., 58 F.2d 32 ; Washington Gas Light Co. v.

Herring v. Yanfeng USA Automotive Trim Systems, Inc

District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 28, 2019

Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F.3d 1089, 1098 (8th Cir. 2015) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … However, the contention that Brown, an employee of Manpower, was the only HR representative would seem to suggest that Ms. Herring’s relationship with Manpower was through Brown, not through Yanfeng.

Hughes v. Dyer

378 F. Supp. 1305 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 16, 1974

Thus, Chief Judge Harris in Davis v. Board of Trustees of Arkansas A & M College, (E.D.Ark.1967) 270 F.Supp. 528, 531 , held that a § 1983 action “sounds in tort and exemplary or punitive damages may be awarded.” … V.

Williamson v. Califano

487 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 1980

Abrams, a board-certified specialist in psychiatry and neurology. Dr. Abrams’ findings were contrary to the findings of Dr. Wells. The clinical and diagnostic tests Dr. … Janka v. Secretary of HEW, supra; Russell v. Secretary of HEW, supra; Brinker v. Weinberger, supra; Timmerman v. Weinberger, supra; Torske v. Richardson, supra; Dressel v.

Waitzmann v. Clay County Sheriff's Department

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 2024

See, e.g., Bey v. … See Board of County Com'rs of Bryan County, Okl. v.

Osborne v. Nixa Fire Protection District

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 18, 2020

Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 850 (8th Cir. 2012); Data Mfg., Inc. v. … To the extent Plaintiff argues the Board should be held liable for the acts of the individual defendants in this case, the claim fails. See Dahl v. Rice County, 621 F.3d 740, 743 (8th Cir. 2010); see also N.S. v.

Mason v. Schriro

45 F. Supp. 2d 709 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 2, 1999

Hubbard, 1998 WL 205180 (N.D.Cal.1998) (claim of deliberate indifference to safety and welfare of inmate); and Brown v. … Batra v. Board of Regents of University of Nebraska, 79 F.3d 717, 722 (8th Cir.1996).

Sonken-Galamba Corp. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

27 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 1939

The .opinion of the Supreme Court in Robertson v. Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 , destroys the argument.

United States v. Houcks

224 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1963

See Blake v. United States (C.A.8) 323 F.2d 245 . … For other statements of the rule see Boyce Motor Lines v. United States, 342 U.S. 337 , 72 S.Ct. 329 , 96 L.Ed. 367 ; Cole v. Arkansas, 338 U.S. 345, 1 . c. 354, 70 S.Ct. 172, 1 . c. 176-177, 94 L.Ed. 155 ; Cline v.

Porter v. Sun Life & Health Insurance

808 F. Supp. 2d 1156 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 20, 2011

Brown v. Seitz Foods, Inc., Disability Ben. Plan, 140 F.3d 1198, 1200 (8th Cir.1998) (citing Ravenscraft, 85 F.3d at 402 ). … Thomas Hicks, who is board certified in occupational medicine, reviewed your file along with the videotape of surveillance. Dr.

Bullard v. Califano

443 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 1978

As stated in Floyd v. Finch, 441 F.2d 73, 76 (6th Cir. 1971), quoted with approval in Garrett v. … Drafts v. Celebrezze, 240 F.Supp. 535, 538 (E.D.S.C.1965); Beason v. Califano, supra, at fn. 27.

Kwang-Ting Christine LEE v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

509 F. Supp. 1182 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 18, 1981

Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education, 585 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 932 , 99 S.Ct. 2053 , 60 L.Ed.2d 66 (1979); Richerson v. Jones, 551 F.2d 918 (3rd Cir. 1977); Pearson v. … Vandalia Butler Board of Education, 585 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 932 , 99 S.Ct. 2053 , 60 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); Richerson v. Jones, 551 F.2d 918 (3rd Cir. 1977); Pearson v.

Parent v. Halter

153 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 18, 2001

(citing Browning v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 817, 822 (8th Cir.1992)). III. … See Dunahoo v.

Lee v. Paige

276 F. Supp. 2d 980 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 2003

Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Inland Oil and Transport Co. v. United States, 600 F.2d 725, 727-28 (8th Cir.1979). … Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.”

Scott v. Precythe

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 2025

Brown, Gregory H. Varner, Bryanne M. … Defendants Leggins, Case, Brown and Bradshaw have been indicted and a “stay of a civil case is most appropriate where a party to the civil case has already been indicted for the same conduct.” Aldridge v. City of St.

Hybki v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.

536 F. Supp. 483 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 1982

Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education, 585 F.2d 192, 194-97 (6th Cir. 1978) (Compensatory damages are not allowable under Title VII). Pearson v. … Williams v.

Moffett v. Commerce Trust Co.

87 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 30, 1940

The Supreme Court in Snowden v. … Id.; Ransom v. Dollar S. S. Line et al., D.C., 2 F.Supp. 409 ; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 ; Kansas City v. Rathford et al., 353 Mo. 1130 , 186 S.W.2d 570 ; Wooldridge et al. v.

Hulver v. United States

393 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 10, 1975

The Supreme Court, in United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954) . . . subsequently rejected the Department’s contention.” (Emphasis added.) … Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946); Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99 (9th Cir. 1962); Quinton v.

Howard v. Wilson Concrete Co.

57 F.R.D. 8 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 11, 1972

Busch & Latta Paint Co. v. Woermann Construction Co., 310 Mo. 419 , 276 S.W. 614 (1925); Barb v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (Mo.Sup.), 281 S.W.2d 297 (1955); Feinstein v. Edward Livingston & Sons, Inc. … See also generally Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L. Ed.2d 80 (1957); Lewis v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (C.A.8), 456 F.2d 605 (1972); Reed v. Board of Education (C.A.8), 460 F.2d 824 (1972).