Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmowd

1,907 results

0.26s

  • Ricketts v. City of Columbia, Mo.

    856 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 1993

    Brown v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc., 755 F.2d 668, 671 (8th Cir.1985). … Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Vonck v. Harris

    531 F. Supp. 672 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 4, 1982

    United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166 , 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980); See also Matthews v. DeCastro, 429 U.S. 181 , 97 S.Ct. 431 , 50 L.Ed.2d 389 (1976); Weinberger v. … United States Railroad Board v. Fritz, supra, 449 U.S. at 101 S.Ct. at 458-460, 66 L.Ed.2d at 375-377 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Burton

    351 F. Supp. 1372 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 1972

    United States v. Burton, 341 F.Supp. 302 (W.D.Mo.1972). … United States v. Jones, 418 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1969); United States v. Brotherton, 427 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1970). This position is not novel. In Rosen v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Loose v. United States

    4 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 1933

    De Hatre v. Edmonds, 200 Mo. 246 , loc. cit. 276, 98 S. W. 744 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 86. Commissioner v. Bingham (C. C. A.) 35 F. (2d) 503, loc. cit. 504. 3. … In the case of the dividend, it only became available by affirmative act of the board of directors. The fund for its payment had to be appropriated.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Wilkinson

    333 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 16, 1971

    Brown v. Kearney (C.A.5) 355 F.2d 199 ; United States v. Hallman (C.A.3) 365 F.2d 289 . … Wilwording v. Swenson, supra; Cox v. Nash (W.D.Mo.) 226 F.Supp. 87 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Flansburg v. Kaiser

    55 F. Supp. 959 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 24, 1944

    In State v. … See, also, United States ex rel. v. Tyler, 269 U.S. 13 , 46 S.Ct. 1 , 70 L.Ed. 138 ; Hawk v. Olson, 8 Cir., 130 F.2d 910 ; Palmer v. McCauley, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 300 ; Urquhart v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. United States

    52 F.2d 269 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 28, 1931

    The case of Sweets Company, etc., v. Commissioner, etc. (2 C. C. A.) 40 F. (2d) 436, 438, is in point. … It had been held by the Board of Tax Appeals that, when there has been an affiliation of corporations, the affiliated group is the taxpayer, and that each change in the membership of an affiliated group creates a new taxpayer

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial Oil Tank & Line Cleaning Service

    730 F. Supp. 1498 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 1990

    In United States v. … Indeed, in [U.S. v.]

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Pescor

    73 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 1947

    Such violation consisting of failure to report for induction, failure to execute his questionnaire, failure to execute his occupational questionnaire, and failure to keep the local Selective Service Board No. 12 of Chicago … In Bowen v. Johnston, 306 U.

    Reversed on other grounds by Jones v. Pescor, 169 F.2d 853 (1948)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ervin v. Blackwell

    585 F. Supp. 680 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 1983

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Peck v. Hoff, 660 F.2d 371 (8th Cir.1981).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Kansas City, Missouri

    347 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 1972

    Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 , 81 S.Ct. 125 , 5 L.Ed.2d 110 (1960); wealth, e. g., Harper v. Virginia [State] Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966); tax status, e. g., Kramer v. … See: Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 377 U.S. 218 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1969); Salsbury v. Maryland, 346 U.S. 545 , 74 S.Ct. 280 , 98 L.Ed. 281 (1954).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hammons v. Folger Coffee Co.

    87 F.R.D. 600 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 1980

    See Colston v. Maryland Cup Corp., 18 F.E.P. Cases 83 (D.Md.1978); Droughn v. F.M.C. Corp., 74 F.R.D. 639 (E.D.Pa.1977). … Ass’n. v. Board of Ed. of Portland, 446 F.2d 763 (8th Cir. 1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Burnside v. Wyrick

    501 F. Supp. 1389 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 18, 1980

    Under the guidelines of Haines v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770, 785, n. 17 , 95 S.Ct. 1284, 1293, n. 17 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cartwright Van Lines, Inc. v. United States

    373 F. Supp. 579 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 9, 1973

    Aero-Mayflower Transit Company, Inc. v. United States et al., 208 F.Supp. 303, 306 (S.D.Cal.1962), citing with approval Miss. Valley Barge Line Co. v. … MC-F-10106, was denied by the Commission’s Review Board No. 5 on January 14, 1969.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Levitt v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

    250 F. Supp. 3d 383 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 13, 2017

    See, e.g., Mahanna v. U.S. … (applying Missouri law); Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 1999 WL 33944680 , at * 13 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 29, 1999) (“Plaintiffs claims do not clearly qualify as continuing torts.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brecklein v. Bookwalter

    231 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 15, 1964

    “Very truly yours, “Lester V. … Estate of Sanford v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 5, 2019

    Plaintiff argues that under Williams v. Preman, 911 S.W.2d 288, 297 (Mo. App. W.D. 1995), overruled on other grounds by Klemme v. … Browne’s opinion that relies on the standard set forth in SKMDV and Nail must be excluded.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Horowitz v. CURATORS OF U. OF MISSOURI

    447 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 12, 1975

    In the landmark case of Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5 Cir. 1961), students were expelled apparently for engaging in lunch-counter demonstrations. … of Regents v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bird v. J. M. Farrin & Co.

    4 F.R.D. 257 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 1945

    In this cause, as ,in Laffoon v. I. M. … Plaintiff contends that the effect of Neirbo Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • La Von Lanigan v. Bartlett and Co. Grain

    466 F. Supp. 1388 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 28, 1979

    See, e. g., Knott v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 527 F.2d 1249 (8th Cir. 1975); Barker v. Taft Broadcasting Co., 549 F.2d 400 (6th Cir. 1977); Earwood v. … The phrase was coined by Judge Brown in his dissent to the denial of a petition for rehearing en banc in Phillips v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.