Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,907 results
0.51s
Scott v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 2024
In Brown v. … Brown v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. 2:23-CV-04002-MDH, 2023 WL 5599630, at *4 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2023); Holden Farms, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown433 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1977
Miller v. Robinson, 378 F.2d 2, 3 (9th Cir. 1967). … Appellant cites Watkins v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedAuburn Hills Homeowners Association v. New Page Properties, L.L.C.
District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 12, 2022
See Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 10; Gully v. First Nat’l Bank, 299 U.S. 109, 113 (1936); Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149, 152 (1908). … F.S., Inc. v. Brown, 951 F. Supp. 1383, 1397 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRainsbarger v. Columbia Glass & Window Co.
600 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 9, 1984
V. … In addition, counsels’ attention was directed to the obvious implications of the recent Eighth Circuit decisions in Jaquette v. Black Hawk County, Iowa, 710 F.2d 455 (8th Cir.1983), and Young v.
Cited 3 timesPublished673 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 9, 1987
Petitioner cited and relied on United States v. Hart, supra, and White v. White, supra, together with Brown v. … Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished367 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 18, 1973
United States, 413 F.2d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 1969) (“farce and mockery” and “judgment of one trained in law”); and Brown v. Swenson, supra, (“farce and mockery” and “deliberate abdication.”) … In Brown v. Swenson, supra, our Court of Appeals’ most recent case, the Court adopted the “farce, or a mockery of justice” language used in Scalf v. Bennett, 408 F.2d 325, 327-328 (8th Cir. 1969).
Cited 4 timesPublishedFederal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Dannen
747 F. Supp. 1357 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 5, 1990
See also, Larimore v. … Bennett v.
Cited 6 timesPublished808 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 16, 1992
Cook v. United States, 765 F.Supp. 217, 219 (M.D.Pa.1991) and Padalino v. United States, 89-2 U.S.Tax Cas. 9632 (D.C.N.J.1989). … See also Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Co. v. United States, 87-2 U.S.Tax Cas. ¶ 9442 (E.D.Ill.1987).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMo-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund v. Botsford Ready Mix Co.
605 F. Supp. 1441 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 2, 1985
The proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board have been completed. … Plaintiffs cite Robbins v.
Cited 7 timesPublished337 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 27, 1972
Bethune v. Finch, (W.D.Mo.) 302 F.Supp. 425, 433 , and cases cited therein. See also Weaver v. Finch, (W.D.Mo.) 306 F.Supp. 1185, 1189 ; Dunn v. Richardson, (W.D.Mo.) 325 F.Supp. 337, 342 . … Griffin v. Finch, (D.S.C.) 303 F.Supp. 162, 166 ; Thomas v. Celebrezze, (C.A. 4) 331 F.2d 541 .
Cited 2 timesPublished227 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 5, 1963
It is Davis v. United States, 287 F.2d 168 (Ct.Cl. 1961), on cert. United States v. … The membership of the Board of Directors and Advisory Board of American included, in addition to its executive officers, representatives of several invest *809 ment, banking and brokerage firms, the Vice-Chairman of a commercial
Cited 4 timesPublished119 F.R.D. 421 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 6, 1987
Goldman v. Checker Taxi Co., 325 F.2d 853 (7th Cir.1963); M.L.C., Inc. v. … The law firm issued a report to the Board of Directors concerning the results of its investigations.
Cited 15 timesPublishedHarrison v. Honorable John O. Marsh
691 F. Supp. 1223 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 1988
One effect of this incorporation was that the requirement of exhaustion of administrative remedies applicable to federal employees under Title VII (See Brown v. … School Board of Nassau County, Florida and Craig Marsh v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987).
Cited 2 timesPublishedStallsworth v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 2018
Brown and Mr. … Brown and Mr. Watkins, as well as a firm resume. Mr. Brown and Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTrinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley
976 F. Supp. 2d 1137 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 26, 2013
Board of Education of Ewing Township, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … Two years earlier, in Brusca v. Missouri ex rel. State Board of Education, 332 F.Supp. 275 (E.D.Mo.1971), aff'd sub nom., Brusca v.
Cited 1 timesPublished576 F. Supp. 1537 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 5, 1984
Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 716 F.2d 1202, 1204 (8th Cir.1983). … Spencer v. NLRB, 712 F.2d 539 (D.C.Cir.1983); Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. NLRB, 695 F.2d 73 (4th Cir.1982); Broad Avenue Laundry and Tailoring v. United States, 693 F.2d 1387 (Fed.Cir.1982).
Cited 5 timesPublishedHrzenak v. White-Westinghouse Appliance Co.
510 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 7, 1981
After noting that Johnson Wax informed all of its Texas employees of their ADEA rights by placing the ADEA poster “on a bulletin board at its regional office in Houston, Texas,” Charlier concluded: Assuming the board was … Bonham v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSable v. Watson-Wilson Transportation System, Inc.
285 F. Supp. 351 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 7, 1968
Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co., 204 U.S. 426 , 27 S.Ct. 350 , 51 L.Ed. 553 (1907). … But in addition to ICC cases the doctrine has been followed by the courts in cases involving the National Labor Relations Board, the National Railroad Adjustment Board, the Civil Aeronautics Board, the Federal Power Commission
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Hawthorn Manufacturing Co.
211 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 1962
They cite United States v. Axman, 234 U.S. 36 , 34 S.Ct. *227 736 , 58 L.Ed. 1198 to sustain their contention. … The complete transcript of proceedings before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, Washington, 1).
Cited 2 timesPublishedJ.P. v. Belton School District No. 124
District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 2020
This is not a class action, and the Students have presented no authority suggesting that they are somehow entitled to seek relief on behalf of all Ball State students.”); cf: Brown v. … In J.M. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna