Case law

Walker v. City of Kansas City, Mo.

697 F. Supp. 1088 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 20, 1988

See also Rich v. … Brown v. Mclbs, Inc., 722 S.W.2d 337, 341 (Mo.App.1986).

Beeman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

724 F. Supp. 674 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 25, 1989

Eglinski, Spencer Fane Britt & Browne, Kansas City, Mo., for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge. … Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 720 S.W.2d 357, 362 (Mo.1986) (en banc); accord Dake v. Tuell, 687 S.W.2d 191 (Mo.1985) (en banc).

Opoku-Agyeman v. Perez

886 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 2012

(March 17, 2010, Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA Denial”)). After a de novo review, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissed Plaintiffs appeal. (Id.). … (May 31, 2011, Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA Reconsideration Denial”)).

Smith v. Kilgore

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 27, 2017

Brown v. City of Golden Valley, 574 F.3d 491, 497 (8th Cir. 2009). The undisputed facts clearly show that officers believed Mr. Smith to have a gun. … As a governmental entity, the Board and the Chief of Police are entitled to sovereign immunity unless one of the specified waivers found in the statute applies. Fantasma v.

Sherer v. Waier

457 F. Supp. 1039 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 12, 1978

Plaintiffs then allegedly requested that the North Kansas City School Board consider the matter. … See Lloyd v. Regional Transp. Authority, 548 F.2d 1277 (7th Cir. 1977); Sites v. McKenzie, 423 F.Supp. 1190 (N.D. W.Va.1976); Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 411 F.Supp. 982 (E.D.Pa.1976); Hairston v.

Walling v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.

65 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 27, 1946

National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Blount, 8 Cir., 131 F.2d 585 ; Southern Ry. Co. v. Black, 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 280 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publishing Co., 322 U.S. 111 , 64 S.Ct. 851 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 .

Osborn v. Engleman

85 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 1949

It is charged by plaintiff that the defendants are doing business as Central Boarding & Supply Company and in such capacity they supply various railroads with help for construction camps. … The rule is well stated in DeFord v.

Porters Building Centers, Inc. v. Sprint Lumber, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 2, 2017

Court also finds that Browne’s opinions, if accepted as true, will assist the jury. See Synergetics, Inc. v. … Browne, however, will not be permitted to offer opinions about what employees can or cannot do legally. Expert testimony on legal matters is inadmissible. S. Pine Helicopters, Inc. v.

United States v. Burton

341 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1972

Later in the evening when the defendant and two companions approached the boarding gate for flight No. 134, Mr. … Webster testified that there were approximately forty persons scheduled to board flight No. 134.

Walker v. Richardson

339 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 6, 1972

Finch v. Perales, 397 U.S. 1035 , 90 S.Ct. 1365 , 25 L.Ed.2d 646 (1970). That case was ultimately decided under the name of Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). … The principles and standards stated in Budds v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Freeman Hospital

914 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 1995

The FTC relies principally upon the decisions in FTC v. University Health, Inc., 938 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir.1991), and United States v. … The Interstate Commerce Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Civil Aeronautics Board, and the Federal Reserve Board are each given enforcement authority for their particular areas of expertise.

Garton v. Swenson

417 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 25, 1976

On March 2, 1976 the Assistant Attorney General advised this Court that the Board of Parole and Probation would not reconsider its position. … United States, 375 F.2d 222, 230 (8th Cir.), *720 cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Ed.2d 176 (1967), and Brown v.

Missouri Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

526 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 24, 1980

The Chief of Engineers concurred in the views and recommendations of the Board of Engineers. … MPIRG v. Butz, supra, at 1300.

Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Larson (In re Larson)

64 B.R. 102 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1986

Then, under the doctrine of Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 139, n. 10 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2213, n. 10 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979), and In re Mountjoy, 368 F.Supp. 1087, 1096 (W.D. … Under such circumstances, in Sur-Gro ' Plant Food Company, Inc. v.

Maxwell v. Swenson

254 F. Supp. 899 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 15, 1966

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 447-450 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). … Petitioner expressly relies upon Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 , 53 S.Ct. 55 , 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932) in support of the first ground and upon Jencks v.

Dougherty v. Walker

349 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 25, 1972

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . As was expressed in the recent case of Tygrett v. Washington, 346 F.Supp. 1247 (Dist. … Conally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 , 46 S.Ct. 126 , 70 L.Ed. 322 . V.

Petition of Kansas City Bridge Co.

19 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 18, 1937

From the facts stipulated it appears clearly that Quarter Boat No. 130 essentially (and disregarding trifling and obviously incidental uses) was a floating movable boarding and rooming house maintained and operated by petitioner … Evansville, etc., Co. v. Chero Cola Bottling Co., 271 U.S. 19, 22 , 46 S.Ct. 379, 380 , 70 L.Ed. 805 . The wharfboat which the Supreme Court in the Evansville, etc., Co.

Euphoric, LLC; The Sourze, LLC; and UNIKC, LLC v. Westport Community Improvement District, A Non-Profit Missouri Corporation; et al.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 22, 2026

V. Order to Show Cause as to Plaintiff Counsel Cecilia J. … App. 2024)”; the correct citation is Earth to Go v. City of Richland, 706 S.W.3d 310 (Mo. Ct. App. 2025). (Doc. 485-1 at 4 n.1.) It also cites “Rodriguez v.

Snipes v. Paramount Liquor Co.

544 F. Supp. 563 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 1982

Idaho Sheet Metal v. Wirtz, 383 U.S. 190 , 86 S.Ct. 737 , 15 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Brennan v. South Davis Community Hospital, 538 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1976). … Brown was originally a plaintiff in this action, but his claim has subsequently been settled and dismissed. . Mr.

Crescent Electric Supply Co. v. Gentile (In re Gentile)

114 B.R. 192 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 11, 1990

Brown, always alert to the enhancement of estates, sold the twenty-four (24) poles on the premises of debtors and the two (2) installed poles to Twehous Construction for $23,426.00. … Crescent sought to pattern its evidence so as to come within the ambit of Windsor Communications Group v. Freedom Greeting Card Co., Inc., 63 B.R. 770 (E.D.Pa.1986).