Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,907 results
0.76s
Wooten v. Pleasant Hope R-VI School District
139 F. Supp. 2d 835 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 28, 2000
Approximately a month after this meeting, Wooten requested, pursuant to board policy, that the Board of Education hold a meeting regarding her expulsion from the softball team. … See Belton v. Board of Police Comm’rs. of Kansas City, 708 S.W.2d 131, 136-37 (Mo. 1986) (en banc).
Cited 4 timesPublishedFederman v. Stricklin (In re Kakolewski)
29 B.R. 572 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 21, 1983
Matter of Brown, 26 B.R. 119 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Mo.1983). … In Katchen v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSherman v. Curators of University of Missouri
871 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1994
See Edelman v. … In Kashani v.
Cited 14 timesPublished7 F.R.D. 140 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 20, 1945
The substantive right being at variance with the procedural rule was held to prevail in Brown v. Cranston, 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 631 , 148 A.L.R. 1178 . In Taverno v. American Auto. Ins. … The case of Sporia v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedMathis v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange
410 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 13, 1976
-C.I.O. v. Insurance Rating Board, 451 F.2d 1178 (6th Cir. 1971). Most recently in Lawyers Title Co. v. St. … Lawyers Title Co. v. St. Paul Title Insurance Corp., supra. They generally authorize or permit certain standards of conduct. Ohio A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Insurance Rating Board, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublished104 F. Supp. 904 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 6, 1952
Thereafter an examination by the NeuroPsychiatric Board revealed that he was suffering from a paranoic type of reaction due to arteriosclerosis and senile changes, and was psychotic. … “In The United States District Court For The District Of Kansas United States Of America v. Charles A.
Cited 12 timesPublished184 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 21, 1960
In Riddell v. … The case of Godwin v. Brown, 8 Cir., 249 F.2d 356 , relied on by defendant, does not encompass the issue here.
Cited 3 timesPublishedParmelee Pharmaceutical Co. v. Zink
188 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 1, 1960
Exhibit Supply Company v. Ace Patents Corporation, 315 U.S. 126, 137 , 62 S.Ct. 513, 519 , 86 L.Ed 736. … In accord: In re Bertsch, 1942, 132 F.2d 1014 , 30 CCPA 813; Claude Neon Lights v. Rainbow Lights, 2 Cir., 1937, 90 F.2d 959 , affirming D.C., 58 F.2d 384 ; Hoskins Mfg. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcClenny v. United Air Lines, Inc.
178 F. Supp. 372 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 6, 1959
Mid-Central Fish Co. v. United States, D.C.W.D. Mo., 112 F.Supp. 792 . … It must be kept in mind that the Civil Aeronautics Board, as distinguished from the Civil Aeronautics Administration, is an independent agency.
Cited 2 timesPublished94 F. Supp. 776 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 2, 1951
Ribas v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, supra; Derrell v. United States, D. C., 82 F. Supp. 18 , loc. cit. 21. 3. … The correctness of this opinion was properly questioned in Brown v. United States, 72 F.
Cited 4 timesPublished351 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 1972
best practicable notice to be given to members of the tentative plaintiff and defendant classes is through a joint press release issued by the original plaintiff and amicus curiae to each county clerk and chairman of each Board … These standards have been applied in 1972 in this Circuit by a Three Judge Court in Smith v. Climer (E.D.Ark.) 341 F.Supp. 123 .
Cited 6 timesPublished342 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 1, 1972
The rationale of Smith v. … Howard v. Ragan, (N.D.Ill. 1945) 59 F.Supp. 374 , which dealt with the powers of the Illinois Board of Parole, and McCowan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGibbs v. RCA Victor Distributing Corp.
214 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 1963
See Fiore v. Family Publications Service (E.D.Mo.1957), 157 F.Supp. 572 , where a motion to quash was •overruled, and compare Shannon v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. … The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Vilter Manufacturing Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAshby v. Cleaners Specialties, Inc.
32 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 17, 1940
As aptly stated in Electrons, Inc., v. … The same thing might be said of the prior practice involving the use of a steam board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas City, Missouri v. Kansas City, Kansas
393 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 23, 1975
West Petroleum Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. … Ellis Gray Milling Co. v. Sheppard, 159 Mo. 505 , 222 S.W.2d 742 (banc 1949); Stein v. Bruce, 366 S.W.2d 732 (Mo.App.1963); and MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Ins.
Cited 11 timesPublished148 F. Supp. 769 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 27, 1957
Texas Public Utilities Corp. v. Edwards, Tex.Civ.App., 99 S.W.2d 420 ; Olive v. Van Patten, 7 Tex.Civ.App. 630 , 25 S.W. 428 ; Delz v. Winfree, 6 Tex.Civ.App. 11 , 25 S.W. 50 ; and Wills v. … Brown v. Wabash Ry. Co., 222 Mo.App. 518 , 281 S.W. 64 .
Cited 7 timesPublished707 F. Supp. 1100 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 26, 1989
See, e.g., Preiser v. Rodriquez, 411 U.S. 475 , 93 S.Ct. 1827 , 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973). … See Gill v.
Cited 1 timesPublished626 F. Supp. 1081 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 22, 1986
Distillers Corp . v. … Chmieleski v. City Products Corp., 660 S.W.2d 275, 295 (Mo.App.1983); Bain v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWalling v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.
65 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 27, 1946
National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Blount, 8 Cir., 131 F.2d 585 ; Southern Ry. Co. v. Black, 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 280 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publishing Co., 322 U.S. 111 , 64 S.Ct. 851 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 .
Cited 1 timesPublished870 F. Supp. 978 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 1994
See, e.g., Bledsoe v. Crowley, 849 F.2d 639 (D.C.Cir.1988) (Md. law); Seoane v. Ortho Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 660 F.2d 146 , 149 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981) (La. law); Feinstein v. Massachusetts Gen. … But see Seek v. Hamrang, 657 F.Supp. 1074 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Hibbs v. Yashar, 522 F.Supp. 247 (D.R.I.1981); Wheeler v. Shoemaker, 78 F.R.D. 218 (D.R.I.1978). III.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna