Case law

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Woodbridge Corp.

124 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 2, 2000

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Rule v.

Conlon v. City of North Kansas City, Mo.

530 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1981

Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens For A Better Environment, 444 U.S. 620 , 100 S.Ct. 826 , 63 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … Solicitations advisory board. There is hereby created a solicitations advisory board which shall consist of three citizens of the city appointed by the mayor.

Luntsford v. Luntsford

117 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1953

In Mayes v. … In support of its ruling, the court cited the case of Poague v. Mallory, 208 Mo.App. 395 , 235 S.W. 491 , and Estes v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., 54 Mo.App. 543 , loc. cit. 551. In the case of Kelly v.

Williams v. Sullivan

779 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1991

v. … Model Code of Professional Responsibility, E.C. 7-14; see also Jones v.

Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. v. Tidewater Oil Sales Corp.

4 F. Supp. 389 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 25, 1933

Grigsby v. Russell, 222 U. S. 149 , 32 S. Ct. 58 , 56 L. Ed. 133 , 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 642, Ann. Cas. 1913B, 863; Gordon v. Ware National Bank (C. C. A.) 132 F. 444 , 67 L. R. A. 550. 3. … Haskett, mentioned in the several contracts and resolutions of the board of directors, clearly refer to accounts then due or about to become due.

Barrett v. Claycomb

936 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 22, 2013

On' June 17, 2011, Linn State’s Board of Regents adopted a mandatory drug-screening policy. … Linn State administrators then presented the policy to the Board of Regents, which approved it. [Doc. # 92 at 24, 128-29]. Members of the Board of Regents are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate.

Savage v. Toan

636 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 22, 1986

See Knights of the KKK v. … also Espino v.

Marks v. Gas Service Company

168 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 1958

Co. v. Carr, 4 Cir., 1957, 251 F.2d 433 ; Williams v. Continental Oil Co., 10 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 4 ; Reynolds v. … A technical and extensive investigation ensued, which resulted in the submission of the statements of the witnesses and the report of the investigative board to the Air Force.

Bolder v. Armontrout

713 F. Supp. 1558 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 26, 1989

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 507 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 446 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). II. … In Brown, the district court, drawing an analogy to Witherspoon v.

City of Warrensburg, Mo. v. RCA Corp.

571 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 19, 1983

Strawbridge, Chairman of the Board of All-Steel, to Mayor Hudson of the City of Warrensburg. … See Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531-32 (8th Cir.1979). 6 *752 V. Negligent Misrepresentation A. Plaintiffs based their negligent misrepresentation claims upon Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 552. [Pis.

Hurst v. United States Postal Service

491 F. Supp. 870 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 26, 1980

Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist., 439 U.S. 410 , 99 S.Ct. 693 , 58 L.Ed.2d 619 (1979); Papish v. Board of Curators of University of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667 , 93 S.Ct. 1197 , 35 L.Ed.2d 618 (1973); Cohen v. … Connecticut State Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education Members, 538 F.2d 471, 478 (2d Cir. 1976).

Rawls v. United States

218 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 27, 1963

See also Silver v. … See Douglas v. King, 8 Cir. 1940, 110 F.2d 911 , 127 A.L.R. 1200 , Estabrook v. King, 8 Cir.1941, 119 F.2d 607 , Kuczynski v.

Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Rastal GmbH & Co. KG

672 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 1987

.; Brown v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc., 755 F.2d 668, 671 (8th Cir.1985); Jasperson v. Purolator Courier Corp., 765 F.2d 736, 741 (8th Cir.1985). … Brown v. New Plaza Pontiac Co., 719 S.W.2d 468, 472 (Mo.Ct.App.1986); see also Proctor v. Stevens Employment Services, Inc., 712 S.W.2d 684 (Mo.1986). VI.

Clements v. Ciccone

285 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1967

Petitioner relies upon the cases of Johnson v. Avery, 252 F.Supp. 783 (M.D. Tenn.1966) and Smartt v. Avery, 370 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967). … Although Johnson v.

At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

86 F. Supp. 2d 932 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 31, 1999

The Supreme Court’s Decision in Iowa Utilities Board On January 25,1999, the Supreme Court overturned parts of the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Iowa Utilities Board. … Brown, 108 F.3d 863, 867 (1997) (choosing not to review issue raised for the first time in a reply brief).

Gillette v. Koss Construction Co.

149 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 14, 1957

Clancy v. Brown, 8 Cir., 71 F.2d 110 ; Harward v. General Motors Corp., D.C., 89 F.Supp. 170 . … Co. v. Thompson, 200 U.S. 206 , 26 S.Ct. 161 , 50 L.Ed. 441 ; Huffman v. Baldwin, 8 Cir., 82 F.2d 5 .

Jordan v. Hanks

683 F. Supp. 1298 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 20, 1988

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 739 F.2d 362 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 904 , 105 S.Ct. 3524 , 87 L.Ed.2d 650 (1986). However, as noted above, plaintiffs have not named the government as a defendant.

Callier v. Hill

326 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 23, 1970

Plaintiff relies on Cypress v. Newport News General and Nonsectarian Hospital Association (C.A.4) 375 F.2d 648 ; Buckner v. County School Board of Greene County, Virginia (C.A.4) 332 F.2d 452 ; Lankford v. … Buckner v. County School Board of Greene County, Va., supra, is sufficiently distinguished from the case at bar by the continuing nature of the alleged discriminatory practices in that case. In Lankford v.

Fabas Consulting Int'l, Inc. v. Jet Midwest, Inc.

74 F. Supp. 3d 1026 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 10, 2015

High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 823 S.W.2d 493, 498 (Mo.1992) (en banc) (quoting, in part, Restatement (Second) of Conflicts § 187, comment g). See also Electr. & Magneto Serv. Co. Inc. v. … Brown v. Home Insurance Co., 176 F.3d 1102, 1105 (8th Cir.1999) (indicating a federal court sitting in diversity applies the forum' state’s choice-of-law principles).

Wheeler v. Kaiser

45 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 1942

Kennedy et al. v. … Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179, 181, 182 , 27 S.Ct. 459, 460 , 51 L.Ed. 760 . Also see Ex parte Howard Lee, 303 U.S. 624 , 58 S.Ct. 742 , 82 L.Ed. 1086 ; Mooney v.