Case law

Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. v. United States

306 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 23, 1969

Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. … Citing Sea-train v. United States, supra.

Wirth v. College of the Ozarks

26 F. Supp. 2d 1185 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 26, 1998

Plaintiff has failed to state a claim under Count V because he has not pled any prohibited animus, only a dispute with Olson and the college over Plaintiffs election campaign for the Hollister School Board. … Plaintiff alleges that the Board of Trustees of the college negligently failed to investigate his concerns during his removal from tenure.

The Lake Hills Motel, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Benton County Sewer District 1

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 14, 2018

Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F.3d 1089, 1098 (8th Cir. 2015) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570 (1972). For the purposes of this motion, Defendants do not dispute that Plaintiffs had a property interest in continued sewer services.

United States v. Long

757 F. Supp. 1038 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 6, 1990

In United States v. … United States v. Floyd, 882 F.2d 235, 240 (7th Cir.1989).

American Standard, Inc. v. Bendix Corp.

487 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 20, 1980

Attention is also invited to the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.,-U.S.-, 100 S.Ct. 502 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980). … In United States v.

Elrod v. Harrisonville Cass R-IX Schools

555 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 1982

In March 1981 the Board of Education for the defendant District (hereafter Board) voted to move the ninth grade to the senior high school for the following school year. … Buhr v. Buffalo Public School Dist. No. 38, 509 F.2d 1196, 1203, n. 8 (8th Cir.1974) (hereafter Buhr). “But the range of interests protected by procedural due process is not infinite.” Board of Regents v.

Johnson v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.

335 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 22, 1971

Brown v. Kitterman, Mo., 443 S.W.2d 146, 153 . And, otherwise, as is necessary, special damages are not effectively alleged in the petition. … Brown v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Assn. (N.D.Ill.) 281 F.Supp. 82, 84 .

United States v. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co.

44 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1942

Counsel cite Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 , Ann.Cas.1918D, 1207. But the cited case, in our judgment, does not support the argument. … The facts in the case were that the United States had petitioned for injunction against the enforcement by the Chicago Board of Trade of a rule requiring members “to desist from further price-making after the close of the

Fry v. Holmes Freight Lines, Inc.

72 F. Supp. 2d 1074 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 1999

Smith v. Marcantonio, 910 F.2d 500, 502-03 (8th Cir.1990); Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Board of County Commissioners, 636 F.Supp. 293, 300 (D.Kan.1986) (holding retaliation claim is not like or reasonably related to sex discrimination charge); see also Tart v.

Bank of Kirksville v. United States

943 F. Supp. 1191 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 1996

The full board reviewed all loans on a monthly basis. … Production Steel, Inc. v. Commissioner, 39 T.C.M. (CCH) 77 , 1979 WL 3659 (1979).

Kemper Military School v. Crutchley

274 F. 125 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 15, 1921

The remaining *127 shares of stock were subscribed for by teachers, and the officers and board of directors are made up of such. These teachers paid for their stock out of their earnings. … Spiders v. Johnston, 214 Mo. 656 , 113 S. W. 1083 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 171, in which this same school was under discussion, is not in point.

People Tags, Inc. v. Jackson County Legislature

636 F. Supp. 1345 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 1986

See Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 462-463 , and n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 2291 and n. 7, 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Police Dept. of Chicago v. … Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Burnham v. Beto

327 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 21, 1971

See: Brown v. State of Arkansas, 426 F.2d 677 (8th Cir. 1970); Word v. North Carolina, 406 F.2d 352 , 357 at n. 7 (4th Cir. 1969). See also: Nelson v. George, 399 U.S. 224 , 90 S.Ct. 1963 , 26 L.Ed.2d 578 (1970). … Nelson v. George, supra,.

Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

682 F. Supp. 1003 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 9, 1988

Co. v. … The Labor Board’s use of the concept has itself been criticized in a case denying enforcement to an order of the Board. Seattle-First National Bank v. NLRB, 638 F.2d 1221 , 1226-7 (9th Cir.1981).

Blegen v. United States Navy

342 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 1971

See, e. g., Owings v. Secretary of the United States Air Force (D.C.D.C.) 298 F.Supp. 849, 852, n. 5 . But the jurisdiction of the federal district court is not “primary jurisdiction.” McCurdy v. … “Primary jurisdiction,” rather, is vested in the naval board for review of discharges created under the provisions of Section 1553, Title 10, United States Code. Page v. McNamara (E.D.Pa.) 263 F.Supp. 334 .

Raybourn v. Burlington Northern Railroad

602 F. Supp. 385 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 15, 1985

Tolbert states that plaintiff has until July of 1985 within which to file a grievance with the National Railroad Adjustment Board or to a public law board designated by the parties. Id. at 7. … Norman v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 414 F.2d 73 , 83 (8th Cir.1969). See also Peters v.

Fowler v. Regional Director, United States Parole Commission

431 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 19, 1977

In Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 494-5 , 93 S.Ct. 1123, 1129 , 35 L.Ed.2d 443 (1973), the United States Supreme Court stated that the “writ of habeas corpus does not act upon the prisoner who seeks … Thus, as the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concluded in McCoy v.

Luntsford v. Luntsford

117 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1953

In Mayes v. … In support of its ruling, the court cited the case of Poague v. Mallory, 208 Mo.App. 395 , 235 S.W. 491 , and Estes v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., 54 Mo.App. 543 , loc. cit. 551. In the case of Kelly v.

Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. v. Tidewater Oil Sales Corp.

4 F. Supp. 389 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 25, 1933

Grigsby v. Russell, 222 U. S. 149 , 32 S. Ct. 58 , 56 L. Ed. 133 , 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 642, Ann. Cas. 1913B, 863; Gordon v. Ware National Bank (C. C. A.) 132 F. 444 , 67 L. R. A. 550. 3. … Haskett, mentioned in the several contracts and resolutions of the board of directors, clearly refer to accounts then due or about to become due.

Carpenter v. Oldham

314 F. Supp. 1350 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1970

Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 , 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967); Dieu v. Norton, 411 F.2d 761 (7th Cir. 1969); Brown v. Dunne, 409 F.2d 341 (7th Cir. 1969) ; Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F.Supp. 624 (D. … See: Wade v. Wilson, 396 U.S. 282, 286 , 90 S.Ct. 501 , 24 L.Ed.2d 470 (1969).