Case law

Wooster Republican Printing Co. v. Channel 17, Inc.

533 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 4, 1981

Hogan v. Barnett Company, 179 F.2d 836 (8th Cir. 1950), and Rutledge v. Miller, 248 F.Supp. 994 (E.D.Mo.1965). … See Wilkinson v. Vaughn, 419 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1967); Ray v. Wooster, 270 S.W.2d 743 (Mo.1954); and Tebeau v. Ridge, 261 Mo. 547 , 170 S.W. 871 (1914).

Smith v. Chater

959 F. Supp. 1142 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 24, 1997

Browning v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 817, 821 (8th Cir.1992); Dixon v. Sullivan, 905 F.2d 237, 238 (8th Cir.1990). Here, there is no evidence of a significant deterioration. … Browning v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d at 821 ; Dixon v. Sullivan, 905 F.2d at 238 .

Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Highway Commission

256 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 10, 1966

The Supreme Court of Missouri has treated the Highway Commission in a manner quite similar to its treatment of governing boards of State educational institutions. State ex rel. Thompson v. … Board of Regents, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S.W. 698, 701 , was cited and relied upon in Bates to establish a separate entity status for the Highway Commission. Bush, in turn, was relied upon in Todd v.

Williams v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

507 F. Supp. 293 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 10, 1980

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, supra; Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, supra. … See also, Fulbright v. Brown Group, Inc., 493 F.Supp. 914 (E.D.Mo.1980).

Huffman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.

39 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 10, 1941

The Act of the Congress creating the defendant, being Section 1463, Title 12 U.S.C.A. provides: “The Board [meaning Federal Home Loan Bank Board] is hereby authorized and directed to create a corporation to be known as the … These facts bring the case within the rule announced in Lasky v.

In re Taylor

160 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 28, 1958

C., on February 28, 1958, for referral to the Board of Review. … Under U.C.M.J., Art. 66(f) the Judge Advocates General are authorized to “prescribe * * * rules of procedure for * * * boards of review. * * In Givens v.

Pearman v. Texaco, Inc.

480 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 21, 1979

Saad v. Shell Oil Co., 460 F.Supp. 114, 116-7 (E.D.Mich.1978). … However, unlike the case of Gilderhaus v.

Hershey v. City of Springfield

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 2022

The Third Amended Complaint names the MSU Board of Governors as well as individual members of the Board of Governors in their official capacities. … (quoting Board of County Com’rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410, 117 S.Ct 1382, 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).

Lawhon Construction Co. v. Carpet Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators

394 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 2, 1974

(the Board). … NLRB v. International Hod Carriers Local No. 1140, 285 F.2d 397, 401 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 903 , 81 S.Ct. 1047 , 6 L.Ed.2d 203 (1960).

Letlow Ex Rel. Bacon v. Evans

857 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 15, 1994

Nelson, 537 F.Supp. at 610, n. 4 ; Freehauf v. School Board of Seminole County, 623 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.App.1993). … See Freehauf v. School Board of Seminole County, 623 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.App.1993); Marcelletti v.

Bush v. Ciccone

325 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 23, 1971

Rosheisen v. Steele, 193 F.2d 273 (8th Cir. 1951); Garcia v. Steele, 193 F.2d 276 (8th Cir. 1951); In Re Baptista, supra; Francis v. United States, 243 F.Supp. 586, 587 (W.D.Mo.1965). … . § 4241 , credit for good time is suspended as to a prisoner who has been found by a Board of Examiners to be insane or of unsound mind. As stated by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Urban v.

Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Lakin

322 F. Supp. 2d 1017 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 22, 2004

Thus, only Thrivent members are eligible to serve on the Thrivent Board of Directors and to vote in the board of directors election. … Co. v.

Stanturf v. Sipes

224 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 1963

In Edson v. Griffin Hospital, 21 Conn. … In Simkins v. Moses H.

Blegen v. Commanding Officer

344 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 26, 1970

An unsatisfactory participation notice was received by petitioner’s Local Board on July 21, 1966. In United States v. … The cases cited by respondent on this point, Pickens v. Cox (C.A. 10) 282 F.2d 784 ; Boyd v. United States (C.A. 9) 269 F.2d 607 ; and United States v.

McMillen v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

8 F.2d 881 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 4, 1925

Stevens v. Richardson (C. C.) 9 F. 191 ; Conner v. Coal Co. (C. C.) 45 F. 802 ; Donahue v. Clay Co. (C. C.) 94 F. 23 ; Judson v. Maccabees (D. C.) 220 F. 1004 . … Cella, Adler & Tilles v. Brown et al. (C. C.) 136 F. 439 . Again a defendant may appear to resist the appointment of a receiver without waiving the right. Sidway v. Missouri Land & Live Stock Co. (C. C.) 116 F. 381 .

Najafi v. Civiletti

511 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 5, 1981

If the hearing officer determines that the respondent should be deported, this decision may be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. … See Yassini v. Crosland, 618 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1980); Narenji v. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745 (D.C.Cir.1979); Hamlehdary v. Civiletti, No. 80-4148 (D.Kan. June 18, 1980). 3 .

Germann v. City of Kansas City, Mo.

579 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 31, 1984

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569-73 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735-1737 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . Id. 714 F.2d at 1418-19 (footnote omitted). … Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141, 143 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954)).

Elrod v. Harrisonville Cass R-IX Schools

555 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 1982

In March 1981 the Board of Education for the defendant District (hereafter Board) voted to move the ninth grade to the senior high school for the following school year. … Buhr v. Buffalo Public School Dist. No. 38, 509 F.2d 1196, 1203, n. 8 (8th Cir.1974) (hereafter Buhr). “But the range of interests protected by procedural due process is not infinite.” Board of Regents v.

Morgan v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority

720 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 30, 1989

See also Lowe v. Conlee, 742 F.2d 1140, 1141 (8th Cir.1984). This court may conditionally grant a new trial if the original verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Brown by Brown v. … Accord Brown, 755 F.2d at 673 . For the reasons set forth in the next section of this opinion the court believes that the jury verdict in the instant case is against the weight of the evidence.

United States v. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co.

44 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1942

Counsel cite Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 , Ann.Cas.1918D, 1207. But the cited case, in our judgment, does not support the argument. … The facts in the case were that the United States had petitioned for injunction against the enforcement by the Chicago Board of Trade of a rule requiring members “to desist from further price-making after the close of the