Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmowd

1,907 results

2.05s

  • Southern Kansas Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United States

    134 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 3, 1955

    Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 35 , 51 S.Ct. 337 , 75 L.Ed. 824 ; Board of Trade of Kansas City, Mo. v. Unite'd States, 314 U.S. 534 , 62 S.Ct. 366 , 86 L. Ed. 432 ; United States v. … Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mendota Insurance v. Hurst

    965 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 8, 1997

    Brown v. Donham, 900 S.W.2d 680 , 633 (Mo. banc.1995). Ms. … The court’s analysis and rationale in Brown are directly applicable to this case.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Franck v. Kaiser

    48 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 9, 1943

    The Governor of the State serves as a member of that Board. … For reasons so clearly stated by Judge Sanborn in the recent case of Hawk v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance

    220 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 1963

    British Type Investors, Inc., (S.D.N.Y.) 15 F.Supp. 497 ; Lucania Societa Italiana Di Navigazione v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., (S.D.N.Y.) 15 F.2d 568 ; Greenshields v. … Krispy Kreme Donut Co., (E.D.Tenn.) 208 F.Supp. 479 ; Evans-Hailey Co. v. Crane Co., (M.D.Tenn.) 207 F.Supp. 193 ; F. & L. Drug Corp. v. American Central Ins. Co., (D.Conn.) 200 F.Supp. 718 ; Browne v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Missouri Beverage Co., Inc. v. Shelton Bros., Inc.

    796 F. Supp. 2d 988 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 17, 2011

    The Court’s view is also supported by High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 823 S.W.2d 493 (Mo.1992) (en banc). … High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., No. WD 43234, at 1, 1990 WL 204340 (Mo.Ct.App. Dec. 18, 1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Flansburg v. Kaiser

    54 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 4, 1944

    Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U.S. 101, 104-5 , 18 S.Ct. 805 , 43 L.Ed. 91 ; Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179 , 27 S.Ct. 459 , 51 L.Ed. 760 ; United States ex rel. Kennedy v. … Kennedy v. Tyler, supra [ 269 U.S. 13 , 46 S.Ct. 3 , 70 L.Ed. 138 ]. See, also: Hawk v. Olson, supra; Palmer v. McCauley, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 300 ; Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179 , 27 S.Ct. 459 , 51 L.Ed. 760 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    694 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 26, 1988

    Chambers v. Local *649 Union No. 639, IBT, 578 F.2d 375, 381 (D.C.Cir.1978). … Little Rock Automotive, Inc. v. NLRB, 455 F.2d 163 , 168 n. 7 (8th Cir.1972). . NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 (1938).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Eagle-Picher Co. v. Sperry

    227 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 9, 1964

    National Labor Relations Board v. … See Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 84 S.Ct. 894 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Villarreal v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    591 F. Supp. 1477 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 9, 1984

    In Gnotta v. … Block, 694 F.2d 979, 985 (5th Cir.1982) and Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mark Aero, Inc. v. Trans World Airlines

    411 F. Supp. 610 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 15, 1976

    ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING DETERMINATION OF ISSUES BY CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO BRIEF DISCOVERY ISSUE WILLIAM H. BECKER, Chief Judge. … “While the Board is empowered to deal with numerous aspects of what are normally thought of as antitrust problems, those expressly entrusted to it encompass only a fraction of the total.” Pan American Airways v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McMurray v. United States

    286 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 1968

    Exhibit 3, Attested copy of Air Force Regulation AFR 55-34, attested for Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force, by Deputy Administrative Assistant Joseph Hacker, Jr. … Huslander v. United States (W.D.N.Y.,1964) 234 F.Supp. 1004 ; Schwartz v. United States (D.N.D.,1965) 38 F.R. D. 164; See, Neher v. United States (D.Minn.,1967) 265 F.Supp. 210 ; See, Annot. 99 A.L.R.2d 1016 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brandow v. Milano

    832 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 31, 1993

    See *267 Baxter v. Lynn, 886 F.2d 182 , 187-88 (8th Cir.1989); Wallace v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 882 F.2d 1327, 1329 (8th Cir.1989). … Eighth Circuit case law suggests that the Board abused its discretion if its decision was “extraordinarily imprudent” or “extremely unreasonable.” See Cox v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad

    221 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 1, 1963

    J. v. Robbins Coal Co. (C.A.5) 288 F.2d 349 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 875 , 82 S.Ct. 122 , 7 L.Ed.2d 77 ; Goforth v. Allstate Ins. Co. (W.D.N.C.) 213 F.Supp. 595 ; Park v. Hopkins (S.D.Ind.) 179 F.Supp. 671 . … (E.D.Tenn.) 208 F.Supp. 479 ; Evans-Hailey Co. v. Crane Co. (M.D.Tenn.) 207 F.Supp. 193 ; F & L Drug Corp. v. American Central Ins. Co. (D.Conn.) 200 F.Supp. 718 ; Browne v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Beishir v. Swenson

    331 F. Supp. 1227 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 28, 1971

    The inmate appears before the Adjustment Board and has an opportunity to make any statement that he desires and the Adjustment Board renders its decision. … In Sostre v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Moss v. National Life and Accident Insurance Co.

    385 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 27, 1974

    His Selective Service Registration Card was issued on December 30, 1965, by Local Board No. 102 in the State of Missouri. During his college years, James V. … See Schone v. Hickman, 397 S.W.2d 596 (Mo.1965); Nelson v. Browning, 391 S.W.2d 873 (Mo.1965); Grider v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, 426 S.W.2d 698 (St.L.App.Mo.1968); Auffenberg Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Bonnie Bee Shop

    55 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 1944

    It is true that Judge Atwell, in the case of Brown, Administrator, v. Wyatt *756 Food Stores, D.C., 49 F. … Judge Dawkins merely delayed an injunction until the applicability of the regulation could be ascertained. ■ Judge Trimble of the Eastern District of Arkansas, in Brown, Administrator, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vann v. Housing Authority

    87 F.R.D. 642 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 12, 1980

    In upholding the district court’s decision, the Eighth Circuit held: In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Board of School Comm’rs v. … Brown, 332 F.Supp. 382 (N.D.Ga.1971), affirmed 457 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1972); Park View Heights Corporation v. City of Black Jack, 467 F.2d 1208 (8th Cir. 1972).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Green v. Union Security Insurance

    700 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 2010

    Brown v. Seitz Foods, Inc., Disability Ben. Plan, 140 F.3d 1198, 1200 (8th Cir.1998) (citing Ravenscraft, 85 F.3d at 402 ). … Brown v. Continental Cas. Co., 348 F.Supp.2d 358, 367-68 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Green v. Union Security Insurance, 646 F.3d 1042 (2011)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cassidy v. Minihan

    52 B.R. 947 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 18, 1985

    Co. v. … State v. Powell, 618 S.W.2d 47, 49 (Mo.Ct.App.1981); City of Trenton v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Emerald Pointe, LLC v. Taney County, Missouri

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 24, 2022

    Brown v. Brown-Thill, 437 S.W.3d 344, 350 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014) (citation and quotation marks omitted). … Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988); and see Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 (1982); Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Association, 496 U.S. 498 (1990); Howlett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.