Case law

United States v. Brown (In re Sapp)

98 B.R. 481 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 4, 1989

Art I, § 26, Morgan v. Willman, 318 Mo. 151 , 1 S.W.2d 193, 195 (1927). … Cassville School Dist. v. McArtor, 286 S.W. 729 , 731 (Mo.App.1926), Kansas City v. Kansas City Elevated Ry. Co., 110 Mo. App. 647 , 85 S.W. 681, 682 (1905).

Click v. Board of Police Commissioners

609 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 28, 1985

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). … Board of Police Commissioners, No. 82-0474-CV-W-4-9; Louden v. Board of Police Commissioners, No. 82-0563-CV-W-1-9; Faherty v. Board of Police Commissioners, No. 82-0564-CV-W-1-9; Coughlin v.

Spencer v. Board of Police Commissioners

564 F. Supp. 1222 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 1983

Sindermann, supra, and Board of Regents v. … In Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8 Cir.1979), the Eighth Circuit reiterated its frequently stated view that “summary judgment is a harsh remedy and should be granted sparingly.”

Ott v. United States Board of Parole

324 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 4, 1971

Following the rule of the decision in this Court in Langston v. … The above statute, it has been said, vests the matter of granting parole into the “almost unreviewable” discretion of the Board of Parole. Hyser v.

Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

444 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 17, 1978

); Brown v. … All paroles shall issue upon order of the board, duly adopted.” 10 . Although Scarpa has been dismissed as moot, 501 F.2d 992 (1973), the Fifth Circuit has substantially readopted the reasoning of that case in Brown v.

Stafford v. Saul

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 7, 2022

Alhilfy v. Saul, No. 4:20-CV-00235-NKL, 2021 WL 462122, at *2 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 9, 2021) (quoting Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016)). … Tr. 672-73, 678-79; Brace v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2009) (“If an impairment can be controlled by treatment or medication, it cannot be considered disabling.” (quoting Brown v.

Nixon v. National Labor Relations Board

559 F. Supp. 1265 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 1983

Bruce v. United States, 621 F.2d 914, 918 (8th Cir.1980); West v. United States, 592 F.2d 487, 492 (8th Cir.1979); Smith v. United States, 588 F.2d 1209, 1211 (8th Cir.1978). … See Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. 738 , 9 Wheat 738, 822-23, 6 L.Ed. 204, 224 (1824). The modern formulation of the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction can be traced to United Mine Workers v.

Gregory v. United States Board of Parole

308 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 21, 1969

See also Morneau v. United States Board of Parole (C.A.8) 231 F.2d 829 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 972 , 76 S.Ct. 1037 , 100 L.Ed. 1490 ; Humphrey v. … United States Board of Paroles, supra, against challenges that it permits the parole board to deprive a prisoner of earned good time, O’Neal v.

Morden v. United States Board of Parole

376 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 20, 1974

This is sufficient to keep petitioner in the “custody” of the United States Board of Parole within the meaning of the habeas corpus statute. Jones v. … Cooks v. United States Board of Parole, 447 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1971); Willis v. Meier, 435 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1970) ; Moore v. Smith, 412 F.2d 720 (7th Cir. 1969); Weathers v.

Irvin v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 6, 2023

Sec., Mo. v. … Subsequent courts have applied this rationale to the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, as it is substantively the same as the St. Louis Board. Stearns v.

Barakat v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 10, 2022

See Bilello, 374 F.3d at 659; Stearnes v. Baur’s Opera House, Inc., 3 F.3d 1142, 1144 (7th Cir. 1993); Harris v. Ericson, 457 F.2d 765, 766 (10th Cir. 1972); but see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … P. 12(h); Arbaugh v.

Cody v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

468 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 10, 1979

Strand v. Schmittroth, 251 F.2d 590, 599 (9th Cir. 1957). See Nolan v. United States, 163 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir. 1947); Banks v. … Sherrill v.

Walker v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

586 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 16, 1984

The plaintiff alleges that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole has denied him his right to “commutation,” and that while he was illegally detained certain unnamed officers, who were “under the second defendant, Mr. … Kelsey v. State of Minnesota, 565 F.2d 503, 505 (8th Cir.1977), citing, Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), and Preiser v.

Watts v. Board of Curators, University of Missouri

363 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 12, 1973

Chitwood v. Feaster, 468 F.2d 359, 361 (4th Cir., 1972); Pickering v. Board of Education (1968) 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . … No. 1, Board et al. (8th Cir. 1972) 464 F.2d 471 '; Thomas et al. v. The Board of Education (8th Cir. 1972) 457 F.2d 1268 ; Ahern v.

National Credit Union Administration Board v. Allen

709 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 16, 1989

Plaintiff, the National Credit Union Administration Board (“NCUAB”), pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1752a, manages said agency. 2. The original defendants in this matter were S. Turner Allen; Kenton L. Stanger; Reed H. … Colla v. Colla, 614 S.W.2d 9, 11 (Mo.App.1981); Schwarze v. May Department Stores, 360 S.W.2d 336, 339 (Mo.App.1962).

Brown v. Precythe

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 30, 2020

See Missouri v. … See Cooper v.

Brown v. Saul

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 13, 2020

Brown’s prior EEO activity” (Doc. 18-12 at 1). Plaintiff asserts that both Mr. Lee and Ms. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986).

Brown v. Saul

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 2, 2019

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION SANDRA KAY BROWN … See Williams v.

Brown v. Precythe

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 2019

Outside of noting that it is a juvenile case, the Board Action Sheet does not discuss Brown’s youth or immaturity at the time of the underlying offense. Doc. 138-35 (Board Action Sheet for Norman Brown). … See Williams v.

Brown v. Precythe

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 12, 2018

See, e.g., Turner v. … See Williams v.