Case law

Meinberg v. United States

310 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 1969

of the Appeals Board. … Schweigert, Inc. v. United States, 388 F.2d 697 , 181 Ct.Ol. 1184. See also United States for the use of Wellman Engineering Co. v. MSI Corp. (C.A. 2) 350 F.2d 285 ; MacEvoy v.

United States v. DeLuna

584 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 1984

In United States v. … United States v. Snyder, 707 F.2d 139 (5th Cir.1983). Both Goodman and his former law partner, Jay Brown, are potential witnesses in this trial.

Britt

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 30, 2026

v. Haverstock, Garrett & Roberts LLP, 405 S.W.3d 19, 24 (Mo. App. 2013). See also Seeley v. … Brown v. Davis, 813 F.3d 1130, 1138 (8th Cir. 2016) (quoting Krause v. U.S. Truck Co., 787 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Mo. banc 1990). See also Consol. Rail Corp. v.

Presswood v. Berryhill

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 2018

See Brown v. Astrue, 2010 WL 889835, at *25 (W.D. Mo. … v.

Longroad Asset Management LLC v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 19, 2025

Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650, 656 (2014); Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 588–89 (1986). … See, e.g., Comm’r v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733, 742, (1949); Luna v. Comm’r, 42 T.C. 1067, 1077–78 (1964).

Kaumeyer v. Steele

115 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 10, 1953

In Groce v. Hudspeth, 121 F.2d 800, 801 , the Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit was confronted with an identical situation. … A similar situation was present in United States v.

Marks v. School Dist. of Kansas City, Mo.

941 F. Supp. 886 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 19, 1996

Finally, in Count V, Marks contends that the District breached his employment contract when the School Board fired him on April 27,1995. … Daffron v.

Jonas v. Hearnes

236 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 30, 1964

Tawes, 377 U.S. 656 , 84 S.Ct. 1429 , 12 L.Ed.2d 595 (1964); Davis v. Mann, 377 U.S. 678 , 84 S.Ct. 1441 , 12 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964); Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695 , 84 S.Ct. 1449 , 12 L.Ed.2d 620 (1964) and Wesberry v. … As set forth in Reynolds v.

Jarred v. Walters Industrial Electronics, Inc.

153 F. Supp. 2d 1095 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 27, 2001

See also Walters v. Metropolitan Educ. … See id.; NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3rd Cir.1982).

United States v. Terrill

688 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1988

See, e.g., FEC v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, 454 U.S. 27, 32 , [ 102 S.Ct. 38, 42 , 70 L.Ed.2d 23 ] (1981); SEC v. Sloan, 436 U.S. 103, 117-118 [ 98 S.Ct. 1702, 1711 , 56 L.Ed.2d 148 ] (1978); FMC v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 [ 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 ] (1965); FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 U.S. 374, 385 [ 85 S.Ct. 1035, 1042 , 13 L.Ed.2d 904 ] (1965); Social Security Board v.

American Federation of Television v. Taft Broadcasting Co.

368 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 20, 1973

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the Petition for Review and enforced the Board’s order. Taft Broadcasting Co. v. NLRB, 441 F.2d 1382 (8th Cir. 1971). … Defendant bases this argument on UAW Local No. 5 v. Scofield, supra, and the consolidated case of NLRB v.

Missouri Public Service Corp. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

19 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 16, 1937

We are bound by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in City of Campbell v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Company, 55 F.(2d) 560, 562 . See, also, Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. … City of Kennett (C.C.A.) 78 F.(2d) 911 , and Iowa Southern Utilities Co. v. Cassill (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 703 .

United States v. Ragusa

520 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981

Compare Brown v. … United States v. Maidman, 340 F.Supp. 395, 400 (S.D.N.Y.1971); Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F.2d 194, 213 (8th Cir. 1974). See United States v.

Fields v. Harris

522 F. Supp. 901 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 1981

The plaintiff appealed her dismissal to the United States Merit Systems Protection Board. … Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 140-146 , 94 S.Ct. 1633, 1637-40 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974). The plaintiff did appeal her dismissal to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Conwell v. Central Missouri Telephone Co.

76 F. Supp. 398 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 10, 1948

Terry v. Anderson, 95 U.S. 628 , 24 L.Ed. 365 ; Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co., supra; Randolph v. City of Springfield, supra. But the determination of the legislature must be given great weight. Terry v. … In Lamb v.

Southwest Truck Body Co. v. Collins

291 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 14, 1968

The Regional National Labor Relations Board determined that there was no merit in either complaint. … Such an unusual result occurred in Avco Corporation v.

Lynes v. Young

376 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 31, 1974

In Covington v. … V.

Huggins v. United States

302 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 11, 1969

Caspar v. Lewin, supra. … Caspar v. Lewin, supra; Slater v. A.T. & S.F. Railway Company, supra.

Loudermill v. Brattin

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 7, 2025

He cites Brown v. Griesenauer and O’Brien v. … The Brown court evaluated whether a board of alderman’s impeachment vote constituted legislative or adjudicative activity. Brown, 970 F.2d at 436-37.

United States v. Courtney

240 F. Supp. 2d 1052 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 5, 2002

The possibility for a departure on these grounds was recognized by the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Brown, 287 F.3d 684 (8th Cir.2002). … Defendant has relied in part on United States v. Terry, 142 F.3d 702 (4th Cir.1998) in objecting to this ground for departure.