Case law

School Dist. of Kansas City v. State of Mo.

460 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 6, 1978

Hoxie School District No. 46, 238 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1956) together with Akron Board of Education v. … This litigation must follow the guidelines set forth in Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406 , 97 S.Ct. 2766 , 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977).

Cissell v. Cleaners Specialties, Inc.

81 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 1948

Such decision of the Board of Examiners, on appeal, is entitled to great respect. Hall v. Montgomery Ward & Co., D.C., 57 F. Supp. 430, 439 . … Chicago Lock Co. v. Tratsch, et al., 7 Cir., 72 F.2d 482 . In Parks v.

Sullivan v. Ciccone

311 F. Supp. 456 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 27, 1970

As grounds for relief in habeas corpus, petitioner states that in October 1969 he was brought before the “Institution’s Good Time Forfeiture Board” rather than before the Adverse Behavior Board, and that he entered a “plea … Harris v. Settle (C.A.8) 322 F.2d 908 , cert. den. 377 U.S. 910 , 84 S.Ct. 1171 , 12 L.Ed.2d 179 ; Austin v. Harris (W.D.Mo.) 226 F.Supp. 304 ; Edmundson v. Harris (W.D.Mo.) 239 F.Supp. 359 ; Sutton v.

Brougham v. Kansas City

263 F. 115 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 24, 1920

board may adjourn the hearing from time to time. … ” Farrar v. City of St. Louis, 80 Mo. 379, 394, 395 , citing Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 , 72 Am. Dec. 276 ; Garrett v. City of St. Louis, 25 Mo. 505 , 69 Am. Dec. 475 ; City of St. Joseph v.

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Baumgardner

55 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 19, 1944

Howe v. Fidelity Trust Co., Ky., 89 S.W. 521 ; Reid v. Durboraw, 4 Cir., 272 F. 99 ; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, D.C., 31 F.Supp. 785 , loc. cit. 787 (1, 2). … Bessett, 41 R.I. 54 , 102 A. 727 , L.R.A.1918C, 961; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, supra.

Boatmen's First Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. McCoy

861 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 23, 1994

Morongo Band v. California State Board of Equalization, 858 F.2d at 1383 . … The Supreme Court in Franchise Tax Board v.

Wyrick v. TWA Credit Union

804 F. Supp. 1176 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 16, 1992

Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Raschick v. … Crockett v. Mid-America Health Services, 780 S.W.2d 656 (Mo.App.1989); Bowman v.

Harmon Industries, Inc. v. Browner

19 F. Supp. 2d 988 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 1998

For example, Wyckoff Co. v. EPA, 796 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Conservation Chemical Co. of Ill., 660 F.Supp. 1236 (N.D.Ind.1987); United States v. … Also see U.S. v.

Medlin Milling Co. v. Moffatt Commission Co.

218 F. 686 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 9, 1915

The defendant corporation was a member of the Kansás City Board of Trade, and all the deals were cleared and closed out through what is known as the clearing house of that board. … Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co., 198 U. S. 236 -249, 25 Sup. Ct. 637, 49 L. Ed. 1031 . The rule in this state, as well as generally, is laid down by the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Hingston v.

Tortora v. Petrovsky

545 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 15, 1982

See, e.g., Polizzi v. Sigler, 564 F.2d 792 (8th Cir. 1977). … Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511, 514-15 , 87 S.Ct. 625, 627-28 , 17 L.Ed.2d 574 (1967). In Garrity v.

Barkley v. Hayes

208 F. 319 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 16, 1913

. * * * “The board is simply a title holder; an instrumentality, the mastery of which is in dispute. … W. 684 ; Carothers v. Moseley, 99 Miss. 671 , 55 South. 881 ; First Presbyterian Church v. Cumberland Presbyterian Church, 34 Okl. 503 , 126 Pac. 197 ; Brown v. Clark, 102 Tex. 323 , 116 S. W. 360 , 21 L. R. A. (N.

Division 1287, Amalgated Transit Union v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority

485 F. Supp. 856 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 1980

Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. … Eagleton v. McQueen, 378 S.W.2d 449 (Mo. banc 1964).

Aipperspach v. McInerney

963 F. Supp. 2d 901 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 2, 2013

Cook, 686 F.3d 494, 496-97 (8th Cir.2012) (citing Brown v. City of Golden Valley, 574 F.3d 491, 495 (8th Cir.2009) (citations omitted)). … (citing Tennessee v.

Harvey v. Housing Development Corporation & Information Center

451 F. Supp. 1198 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 28, 1978

A similar argument was made in the case of Fenton v. … In LaGrone v.

In re Smith

142 B.R. 348 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 26, 1992

Debtor seeks to sit for the license exam given by the Missouri Board of Cosmetology but she is unable to do so because the school will not submit a certification to the Board in accordance with the Missouri law that requires … Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1, 210-11 , 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824). In the bankruptcy context, the case of Perez v.

Robinson v. Smith

585 F. Supp. 1072 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 23, 1984

In Brown v. … Brown, supra, 96 S.Ct. at 1969 .

United States v. Johnson

350 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 7, 1972

No. 85-752, 72 Stat. 845 (Aug. 25, 1958) (not coded in U.S.C.); Jones v. United States, 419 F.2d 593 (8th Cir. 1969); Vaughn v. United States, 359 F.2d 809 (7th Cir. 1966); see also United States v. … Jones v. United States, 419 F.2d 593 (8th Cir. 1969).

Lock Joint Pipe Company v. Anderson

127 F. Supp. 692 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 10, 1955

The petition for certification is still pending the Board’s determination. … See Home Building Corp. v. Carpenters District Council, D.C.W.D.Mo., 53 F.Supp. 804 ; and American Optical Co. v. Andert, D.C.W.D.Mo., 108 F.Supp. 252 . Cf. also Dynamic Mfrs., Inc., v.

Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. Walsh

435 F. Supp. 707 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 1977

Mathews, 399 F.Supp. 1163 (D.D.C.1975); Mothers’ and Children’s Rights Organization v. Sterrett, 467 F.2d 797 (7th Cir. 1972); Lyons v. Weinberger, 376 F.Supp. 248 (S.D.N.Y.1974); Provost v. … Betit, 326 F.Supp. 920 (D.Vt.1971); Merriweather v. Burson, 325 F.Supp. 709 (D.Ga.1970); Brown v. Wohlgemuth, 371 F.Supp. 1035 , aff’d, 492 F.2d 1238 (3d Cir. 1974); Brower v. Wohlgemuth, 371 F.Supp. 863 (E.D.Pa.1974).

Wehrmeyer ex rel. Wehrmeyer v. Wood

313 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 29, 1970

That card subsequently found its way back to petitioner’s local selective service board. The board then gave petitioner a “courtesy hearing” to make sure that he had not turned in the card on a whim. … We stayed our decision in this case pending that of the Supreme Court in Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 , 90 S.Ct. 506 , 24 L.Ed.2d 532, 1969 .