Case law

Northland Parent Association v. Board of Education of Excelsior Springs School District

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 11, 2021

Co. v. AdvancePCS, 316 F.3d 737, 744 (8th Cir. 2002). … Corp. v. Clorox Co., 140 F.3d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1998)). Dakota Rural Action v. Noem, 416 F.Supp.3d 874, (D.S.D. Sept. 18, 2019).

Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Enright

264 F. 236 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 26, 1920

Davis v. Elmira Sav. Bank, 161 U. S. 283 , 16 Sup. Ct. 503, 40 L. Ed. 700 . … The power of Congress and the validity of the action of the Federal Reserve Board is expressly upheld. The court, citing McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 , 4 L. Ed. 579 , and Osborn v. Bank, 9 Wheat, 738, 6 L.

Parents, Families, & Friends of Lesbians & Gays, Inc. v. Camdenton R-III School District

853 F. Supp. 2d 888 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 15, 2012

Superintended Hadfield agreed at the hearing that school board member John Beckett has expressed “concern with students accessing websites saying it’s okay to be gay.” (Tr. 76). At a public school board meeting, Mr. … See Brown v. Entm’t. Merck. Ass’n, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 2738 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011).

Meeks v. Vermillion

444 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 1978

In Kelsey v. … In Williams v.

Barry v. Blue Springs R-IV School District

557 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 2, 1983

Butler v. MFA Life Insurance Co., 591 F.2d 448, 451 (8th Cir.1979), citing Percival v. General Motors Corp., 539 F.2d 1126, 1129 (8th Cir.1976); Lyons v. Board of Education, 523 F.2d 340, 347 (8th Cir.1975). Jewson v. … State College, 589 F.2d 475 (10th Cir.1978); Bignall v. North Idaho College, 538 F.2d 243 (9th Cir.1976); Johnson v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis., 377 F.Supp. 227 (W.D.Wis.1974); Jimenez v.

Williams v. McClain

708 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 15, 1989

For example, see Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987) (statutory parole rights become enforceable as a matter of constitutional law). … See, e.g., Brown v. Manning, 630 F.Supp. 391, 398-9 (E.D.Wash.1985).

McBride v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

312 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 1970

Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650 , 85 S.Ct. 614 , 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1965). See also: Neal v. System Board of Adjustment, 348 F.2d 722, 726 (8th Cir. 1965). … hearing by that board.

United States v. Batson

334 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 29, 1971

United States v. … See McNeil v. United States, 395 U.S. 463 , 89 S.Ct. 2025 , 23 L.Ed.2d 446 (1969). In the later case of United States v.

Fenton v. Citizens Savings Association

400 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 19, 1975

In Wachtel v. … V); Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 329 F.Supp. 270 (S.D.N.Y.) 1971.

Miller v. Missouri

394 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 11, 1975

Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 , 83 S.Ct. 373, 377 , 9 L.Ed.2d 285, 291 (1963); accord, Morden v. United States Board of Parole, et al., 376 F.Supp. 226, 231 (W.D.Mo.1974); see also, Carafas v. … Brown v. Swenson, 487 F.2d 1236, 1241 (8th Cir. 1973); Bosler v. Swenson, 423 F.2d 257 (8th Cir. 1970); Baines v. Swenson, 384 F.2d 621 (8th Cir. 1967); Collins v. Swenson, 384 F.2d 623 (8th Cir. 1967); Hooper v.

Satterfield v. Western Electric Co.

604 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1984

The determination of whether conduct is a peripheral concern of the Act turns on “whether the controversy presented to the [ ] court is identical with that which could *85 be presented to the Board.” Belknap, Inc. v. … This exception is most frequently invoked where the Board lacks the authority to grant the remedy sought by the plaintiff. See, e.g., Belknap, Inc. v. Hale, 103 S.Ct. at 3183; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.

Drew v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

596 F. Supp. 1371 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 28, 1984

LeFevre v. Stubbs, 642 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Mo.1982) (quoting Crawford, Construction of Statutes § 346 (1940) and State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Education of City of St. … See § 400.2-202(b), RSMo; McDown v. Wilson, 426 S.W.2d 112, 117 (Mo.App.1968); Brown v. Oliver, 123 Kan. 711 , 256 P. 1008 (1927). 8 . Unlike the situation in Jacobson v. Federal Deposit Ins.

Sperry v. Local Union No. 562, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of United States & Canada

210 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 2, 1962

Petitioner is Regional Director of the Seventeenth Region of the Board, an agency of The United States, and filed the petition herein for and on behalf of the Board. 2. … Schauffler v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen’s Ass’n., 292 F.2d 182, 187 (3 Cir. 1961).

Barchers v. Union Pacific Railroad

765 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 18, 1991

Hackett v. McGuire Bros., Inc., 445 F.2d 442 , *597 446 (3d Cir.1971). … Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 , 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2204-05 , 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975).

Donnelly Garment Co. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union

21 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 31, 1937

National Labor Relations Board v. Delaware-New Jersey Ferry Co., 3 Cir., 90 F.2d 520 , certiorari denied 58 S.Ct. 141 , 82 L.Ed.-. … Therefore, the National Labor Relations Act applies to plaintiffs under the authority of National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Moriarty

319 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 15, 1970

United States v. Zmuda, 423 F.2d 757 (3d Cir. 1970). 6 Therefore, such de *122 fense is not available to the defendant in this case. … United States v. Weissman, 434 F.2d 175 (8th Cir. 1970).

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Polonyi

531 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 8, 1981

Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330 , 99 S.Ct. 2326 , 60 L.Ed.2d 931 (1979). … See, generally, Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, 398 U.S. 235 , 90 S.Ct. 1583 , 26 L.Ed.2d 199 (1970). The review procedures of Section 12c(2) are clearly discretionary under the Act.

Holliday v. Settle

218 F. Supp. 738 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 18, 1963

Section 4207 of Title 18 U.S.C.A. provides : “A prisoner retaken upon a warrant issued by the Board of Parole, shall be given an opportunity to appear before the Board, a member thereof, or an examiner designated by the Board … United States v. Kenton (C.A. 2), 287 F.2d 534 , l. c. 535-536; Adams v. Hudspeth (C.A. 10), 121 F.2d 270 , l. c. 272; United States v.

Lee v. Consolidated School District No. 4, Grandview

494 F. Supp. 987 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 1980

Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 576 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); see also, Hastings v. Bonner, 578 F.2d 136, 141 (5th Cir. 1978). … Id.; Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Hastings v. Bonner, 578 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1978).

United States v. Wrigley

392 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 11, 1975

That argument is based primarily on the recent opinion of the Honorable Milton Pollack, Southern District of New York, in United States v. Brown, 389 F.Supp. 959 , decided February 25, 1975. … We therefore reject the government’s new argument and respectfully note our disagreement with the rationale upon which Judge Pollack based his decision in United States v. Brown.