Case law

Brotherhood of Railway, Airline, & Steamship Clerks v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.

442 F. Supp. 1173 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 27, 1977

Barrett v. Manuf. Ry. Co., 326 F.Supp. 639, 643-44 (E.D.Mo.1971) aff. 453 F.2d 1305 (8th Cir. 1972). … This standard of review applies to boards created under the provision of § 153 Second whether the board is created by paragraph one or two of that section. Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v.

Brenner v. School District of Kansas City, Missouri

315 F. Supp. 627 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 14, 1970

Lassiter v. Northampton County *630 Board of Elections, 360 U.S. 45, 50 , 79 S.Ct. 985, 989 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1959).” Lassiter v. … See, e. g., Dusch v. Davis, supra; Sailors v. Board of Education, supra; Fortson v. Morris, supra; and Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections, supra.

United States v. Lamberd

315 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 12, 1970

James, supra, holding that the Local Board must state a “rational basis” for the rejection of the claim; United States v. Houghton (C.A. 9) 413 F.2d 736 , 739 ; 6 O’Brien v. … But all of those cases were cases wherein the Appeal Board assigned reasons which were legally insufficient. See Gatchell v. United States (C.A. 9) 378 F.2d 287 ; Owens v.

Pilchak v. Camper

741 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 23, 1990

Roger Brown to be highly credible. … Nearly forty years later in Brown v.

Sommer v. Bihr

631 F. Supp. 1388 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 2, 1986

Brown, Edwin H. Bihr, H. Kenneth Kirchner, Richard E. Moore and Arthur L. … See University of Missouri v. Dalton, 456 F.Supp. 985, 997 (W.D.Mo.1978); International Assoc. of Firefighters v. City of Sylacauga, 436 F.Supp. 482, 489 (N.D.Ala.1977).

Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri

257 F. Supp. 953 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 5, 1966

Brown in Martin v. … We are, of course, familiar with Kirby v. Illinois State Electoral Board, N.D. Ill.1965, 251 P.Supp. 908.

Jenkins v. State of Mo.

959 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 1997

a vestige of de jure segregation); School Board of the City of Richmond v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II).

Higgins v. McGrath

98 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 9, 1951

United States v. Fox, 95 U.S. 670 , 24 L.Ed. 538 ; United States v. Lawrence, 26 Fed.Cas., page 887, No. 15,577; United States v. Chisolm, 5 Cir., 149 F. 284 . We need not pursue that matter further. … United States v. Chisolm, supra.

Swift v. Ciccone

351 F. Supp. 1149 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1972

Lynch v. United States, 414 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1969); Langston v. United States, 310 F.Supp. 147 (D.Pa. 1970); Hill v. United States Board of Parole, 257 F.Supp. 129 (D.Pa.1969); *1152 United States ex rel. Obler v. … Williams v. United States Board of Paroles, 428 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1970); Esquivel v. United States, 414 F.2d 607 (10th Cir. 1969); Hedrick v. Steele, 187 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1951).

Kemp v. Bradley

340 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 9, 1971

We must examine the facts before the Board to determine whether they cast doubt on the sincerity of the claim. Sincerity is the touchstone of conscientious objection. See Witmer v. … For that reason, we will not disturb the determination of the Administrative Board. Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 ; Dickinson v.

Parents, Families, & Friends of Lesbians & Gays, Inc. v. Camdenton R-III School District

853 F. Supp. 2d 888 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 15, 2012

Superintended Hadfield agreed at the hearing that school board member John Beckett has expressed “concern with students accessing websites saying it’s okay to be gay.” (Tr. 76). At a public school board meeting, Mr. … See Brown v. Entm’t. Merck. Ass’n, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 2738 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011).

Tritico v. United States Parole Commission

760 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 9, 1991

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Williams v.

National Bond Finance Co. v. General Motors Corp.

238 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 20, 1964

Plaintiff cites and largely relies upon Fish v. … Day Co. v. Shapiro, 105 U.S. App.D.C. 392, 267 F.2d 669, 674 .

Moore v. Custis

565 F. Supp. 48 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 2, 1983

A three-day hearing was commenced by a three-member disciplinary board on January 26, 1982. The disciplinary board sustained four of the seven charges. … In reviewing the administrative record in existence, Camp v.

Fenton v. Citizens Savings Association

400 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 19, 1975

In Wachtel v. … V); Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 329 F.Supp. 270 (S.D.N.Y.) 1971.

United States v. Burnett

115 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 1, 1953

This communication was signed for the Board by the Clerk. … Cox v. United States, 332 U.S. 442 , 68 S.Ct. 115 , 92 L.Ed. 59 ; Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 , and many other cases.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

203 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 26, 1962

On September 13, 1961, pursuant to a hearing by the System Board of Adjustment, it was determined by the Board that TWA had failed to comply with the bargaining agreement as supplemented by the Memorandum of Understanding … In the International Ass’n of Machinists ease, the court re-affirmed its former holding in Metcalf v.

Mining v. Wheeler

378 F. Supp. 1115 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1974

Broadrick v. Oklahoma, supra, 413 U.S. at 627-628, 93 S.Ct. 2908 (Brennan, J., dissenting); Elder v. Rampton, supra, 360 F.Supp. at 563 ; Lecci v. Cahn, 360 F.Supp. 759, 767-768 (E.D.N.Y.1973); and Gray v. … See also United States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396, 399 , 50 S.Ct. 167 , 74 L.Ed. 508 (1930); and Elder v. Rampton, supra, 360 F.Supp. at 564. V.

White v. Fawcett Publications

324 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 20, 1971

Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co., supra,. … Nelson v. Browning, Mo., 391 S.W.2d 873 , l. c. 881.

Porter v. Bowers

70 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 20, 1947

Brown. The Senator from Washington is correct. … Brown. We thought the President should have the authority to determine those matters. “Mr. Barkley. Mr. President, will the Senator yield? “Mr. Brown. I yield. “Mr. Barkley.