Case law

Brown v. Lowden

3 F.R.D. 173 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 7, 1942

of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care.’ ” Atlas Powder Co. v. … Benson, 3 Cir., 287 F. 797, 798 ; San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. Requena, 224 U.S. 89 , 32 S.Ct. 399 , 56 L.Ed. 680 . The plaintiffs should not be required to specify what caused defendants’'!

Brown v. Commerce Trust Co.

9 F.R.D. 317 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 1949

Section 312(b) p. 880; Press v. Penny, 242 Mo. 98 , 145 S.W. 458 , 18 A.L.R. 794 . However, there are numerous and important exceptions to this general rule.

Olds v. Brown Shoe Co.

25 F. Supp. 880 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 1938

It charges the defendant Brown Shoe Company and Riley Poison, Superintendent of that company’s Moberly, Mo., shoe factory, with negligently requiring plaintiff to work in a place and under conditions which were unhealthy … Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co., 231 Mo. 176 , 132 S.W. 703 , 140 Am.St.Rep. 515 ; Clark v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., D.C., 194 F. 505 ; Brunski v. Ford Motor Co., D.C., 299 F. 807 ; Davis v.

Brown v. Bowen

672 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 30, 1987

McMillian v. Schweiker, 697 F.2d at 221 . … Brown’s testimony was not fully credible.

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

174 F.R.D. 90 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 22, 1997

Co. v. … Sam Brown Co., 19 F.3d 1259, 1265 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 989 , 115 S.Ct. 487 , 130 L.Ed.2d 399 (1994), and the jury that decides liability must also decide whether punitive damages are warranted, Panjwani v.

May Department Stores Co. v. Brown

60 F. Supp. 735 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 5, 1945

Union, etc., v. … Baltimore Transit Co. v. Flynn, D.C., 50 F.Supp. 382, 387 . Oil Workers Internat'l Union, etc., v. Texoma Natural Gas Co., 5 Cir., 146 F.2d 62 . 45 U.S.C.A. § 146 . National Labor Relations Board v.

Stephens-Brown, Inc. v. United States

81 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 14, 1949

Brown v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.

960 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 8, 1997

Tech Hills II Assocs. v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Ins. Co., 5 F.3d 963, 968 (6th Cir.1993) (citing Kerr v. Holland America-Line Westours, Inc., 794 F.Supp. 207, 212-13 (E.D.Mich.1992); Trepel v. … See also General Beverage Sales Co. v.

American States Insurance v. Brown

333 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 10, 1971

v. … In Brown v. Collins and O. K.

Brown v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins.

11 F.R.D. 81 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 28, 1950

Mission Insurance v. Brown

207 F. Supp. 818 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 1962

Defendant Gayla Rae Brown, the driver of one car, was the 19-year old wife of defendant Arnold Ray Brown, who was the son of William A. and Velma N. Brown. … Canadian In *820 demnity Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co., (9th Cir., 1955), 222 F.2d 601 . See also Kaufman v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., (3rd Cir., 1957), 245 F.2d 918 .

Brown v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

569 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 1983

The Board found that TWA was “justified in concluding that [Brown] had violated the provisions of Article 6(d)(10) of the agreement between the parties.” Board decision at 2. … Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 532 (8th Cir.1979); Lundeen v. Cordner, 354 F.2d 401 (8th Cir.1966). Material facts are not in dispute.

Brown v. MISSOURI BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

727 F. Supp. 524 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 8, 1989

Petitioner’s first Section 2254 petition, filed as Brown v. … John William Brown v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, et al, No. 68,353, Sept. 16, 1986. See, Petitioner’s Motion Exhibit B.” 5 Petition at 6(a).

Jacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.

792 F. Supp. 1520 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 8, 1992

Co. v. Missouri State Highway Commission, 454 S.W.2d 44, 56 (Mo. banc 1970); Scullin Steel Co. v. PACCAR, Inc., 708 S.W.2d 756, 761 (Mo.App.1986). Jacobs argues that Brown’s future profit claim was based on Dr. … Thus, Jacobs is correct that by suing for damages for fraud, Brown has affirmed the contract. Brown’s argument to the contrary misconstrues the authority it cites. Brown relies primarily upon Western Fireproofing Co. v.

Shannon v. BROWN AND WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.

167 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 26, 1958

Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, 2 Cir., 1948, 165 F.2d 33 . … These are Collar v. Peninsular Gas Company, Mo.1956, 295 S.W.2d 88 ; Hayman v. Southern Pacific Company, Mo.1955, 278 S.W.2d 749 , and Wooster v. Trimont Mfg. Co., 1947, 356 Mo. 682 , 203 S.W.2d 411 .

Brown v. Brown-Thill

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 12, 2021

Brown and Saurine L. … Brown and Saurine L. Brown Trusts, and approving a final accounting of the Brown Family Estate, which included the Family Limited Partnerships at issue in this case (the “2016 Probate Order”).

Board of Trade v. United States

36 F. Supp. 865 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 21, 1941

Co. v. United States, 289 U.S. 627 , 53 S.Ct. 768 , 77 L.Ed. 1410 ; Penn Refining Co. v. Western New York & P. R. R. Co., 208 U.S. 208 , 28 S.Ct. 268 , 52 L.Ed. 456 ; United States v. Illinois Cent. R. … Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 307 U.S. 125 , 59 S.Ct. 754 , 83 L.Ed. 1147 ; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific, 222 U.S. 541 , 32 S.Ct. 108 , 56 L.Ed. 308 ; Manufacturers’ Ry. Co. v.

Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

212 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 14, 1963

Of course, there is general language in Becker v. … And also see Lonergan v.

Brown v. Holland Furnace Co.

214 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 1963

Brown for which he claimed and was paid several thousands of dollars for personal injuries. … Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 , 55 S.Ct. 296 , 79 L.Ed. 603 , 95 A.L.R. 1150 (inadequacy claimed); Fairmount Glass Works v.

Board of Trade v. Milligan

16 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 1936

In the case of Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1 , 43 S.Ct. 470 , 67 L.Ed. 839 , practically identical questions were presented in the challenge there lodged to the constitutionality of that act. … Wallace, 258 U.S. 495, 519 , 42 S.Ct. 397, 403 , 66 L.Ed. 735 , 23 A.L.R. 229 ; Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1, 35 , 43 S.Ct. 470, 476 , 67 L.Ed. 839 ; Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v.