Case law

Connealy v. Walsh

412 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 19, 1976

Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, Arnett v. Kennedy, supra; Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975).

Van Deelen v. City of Kansas City, Missouri

411 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 2006

V of the City’s Charter, the Personnel Department is established. Within the Personnel Department, Section 111 of Art. V of the City’s Charter establishes a “personnel board.” 13 Article V, Sec. … Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978).

Parton v. GTE North, Inc.

802 F. Supp. 255 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 9, 1991

Hardman v. Board of Education, 714 F.2d 823, 825 (8th Cir. 1983) (quoting Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 488 F.2d 714 , 716-17 (5th Cir.1974)). … Zook v. Brown, 865 F.2d 887, 896 (7th Cir.1989). . Plaintiff’s request for attorney fees included an amount for time devoted to administrative proceedings. Such an amount is allowed pursuant to Bobbitt v.

Porter v. Berall

142 F. Supp. 2d 1145 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 5, 2001

One of the more recent appellate decisions so ruling is Sawtelle v. … Poole v. Sasson, 122 F.Supp.2d 556, 559 (E.D.Pa.2000).

Paglin v. Saztec International, Inc.

834 F. Supp. 1184 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 17, 1993

Brown & Co., 808 S.W.2d 950, 954-55 (Mo.Ct.App.1991). The court also recognizes that questions of intent often *1194 present witness credibility issues that lie within the peculiar province of the jury. … To establish that a demand on a corporate board would be futile, Missouri law requires a plaintiff to allege “actual wrongdoing by a majority of the board.” See Dawson v.

Owen v. City of Independence, Mo.

421 F. Supp. 1110 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 2, 1976

Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31 (3rd Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 983 , 95 S.Ct. 1986 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975); Williams v. Brown, 398 F.Supp. 155 (N.D.Ill.1975); Patterson v. … Board of Regents, supra, and Perry v. Sindermann, supra. See e. g.: Mims v. Board of Education of City of Chicago, 523 F.2d 711 (7th Cir. 1975); Bertot v.

White v. Wilson

301 F. Supp. 469 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 6, 1969

I This habeas corpus case involves the same petitioner and is directly related to the case of White v. Swenson, (W.D. Mo.1969, 301 F.Supp. 447 , No. 1347, in the Central Division, decided May 2, 1969.

Gay Lib v. University of Missouri

416 F. Supp. 1350 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 1976

In both Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Papish v. … University of Pittsburgh, 477 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1973); Anthony v. Cleveland, 355 F.Supp. 789 (D.Hawaii 1973). 26 . See Green v. Dumke, 480 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1973); Brown v. Strickler, 422 F.2d 1000 (6th Cir. 1970). 27 .

Goodlow v. The Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 2025

) Case No. 4:25-cv-00597-DGK ) THE BOARD OF POLICE ) COMMISSIONERS … Rosemann v. Rosemann, 349 S.W.3d 468, 472 (Mo. App. 2011). There is no such substantial basis in the evidence here.

Jenkins v. School Dist. of Kansas City, Mo.

73 F. Supp. 2d 1058 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 17, 1999

(citing Swann v. … Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 288 , 97 S.Ct. 2749, 2761 , 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977) (quoting Brown v. Board of Educ., 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955)).

Naturopathic Laboratories International, Inc. v. Dermal Research Laboratories, Inc.

415 F. Supp. 2d 1007 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 2006

See Mathieu v. Gopher News Co., 273 F.3d 769, 776 (8th Cir.2001); Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co., 72 F.3d 648, 655 (8th Cir.1995). … Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 509 U.S. 209, 242 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993); see also Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1057 (8th Cir.2000); Morgenstern v.

Hailey v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

599 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1984

See Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Kansas City Fibre Box Co., 35 F.2d 822, 823 (6th Cir.1929), cert. den., 281 U.S. 730 , 50 S.Ct. 247 , 74 L.Ed. 1147 (1930); and see also Meekison v. … Arnold Savings Bank, 411 S.W.2d 159, 163-65 (Mo.1966) (en banc); Knight v. M.H. Siegfried Real Estate, Inc., 647 S.W.2d 811, 814 (Mo.App.1982); Fischer v. Browne, 586 S.W.2d 733, 736-37 (Mo. App.1979).

Sperry v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n Local Union No. 782

202 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 1962

by the Board on November 24,1961, and that accordingly, no charge against Spartan under Section 8(a) (2) is presently pending before the Board. 6. … Petitioner is Regional Director of the Seventeenth Region of the Board, an agency of the United States, and filed the petition herein for and on behalf of the Board. 2.

Davis v. United States

288 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 1968

Wright v. Settle (C.A. 8,1961), 293 F.2d 317 . At the time petitioner filed the petition herein, his parole had not been revoked by the Board of Parole under Section 4207, Title 18, U.S.C. … Humphrey v. Wilson (W.D.Mo., 1968), 281 F.Supp. 937 . It is for the Board of Parole in the first instance to determine if cause exists for revocation of petitioner’s parole.

Schultz v. Talley

152 F.R.D. 181 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 16, 1993

State v. Clovis, 248 Kan. 313 , 807 P.2d 127, 134 (1991); State v. Knox, 4 Kan.App.2d 87 , 603 P.2d 199, 204 (1979). … Tye v. City of Jacksonville, Fla., 707 F.Supp. 1298, 1300 (M.D.Fla.1989); Sweeny v.

Lawson v. Potter

282 F. Supp. 2d 1089 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 16, 2003

. *1092 In Brown v. … Finally, Chandler v. Roudebush was decided by the Supreme Court on the same day as Brown v.

Hobbs v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

751 F. Supp. 2d 1111 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 18, 2010

James Ceaser, a board certified cardiologist and Plaintiffs treating physician. Id. at 356-57. During their conversation, Dr. Ceaser told Dr. … Cash v. Wal-Mart Grp. Health Plan, 107 F.3d 637, 641 (8th Cir.1997) (quoting and citing Collins v. Cent. States S.E. & S.W. Areas Health & Welfare Fund, 18 F.3d 556, 560 (8th Cir.1994)); cf. Brown v.

Ott v. Ciccone

326 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 10, 1970

Section 4203, Title 18, U.S.C.; Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 388 F.2d 567 ; Brest v. Ciccone (C.A.8) 371 F.2d 981 ; French v. Ciccone (W.D.Mo.) 308 F.Supp. 256 ; Langston v. … Campbell v. Pate (C.A.7) 401 F.2d 55 ; Boddie v. Weakley (C.A.4) 356 F.2d 242 ; Berry v. United States Board of Parole (M.D.Pa.) 266 F.Supp. 667 ; Koptik v.

Scoggin v. Lincoln University

291 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 19, 1968

(The Dean obviously was familiar with the principles stated in such leading cases as Thornhill v. State of Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 , 60 S.Ct. 736 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 , and West Virginia State Board of Education v. … Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education (5th Cir. 1961) 294 F.2d 150 , cert. den. 368 U.S. 930 , 82 S.Ct. 368 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 193 ; Esteban v. Central Missouri State College (W.D.Mo.1967) 277 F.Supp. 649 .

Gale v. Moore

587 F. Supp. 1491 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1984

See Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles, 678 F.2d 940 (11th Cir.1982) (Georgia); Williams v. Briscoe, 641 F.2d 274 (5th Cir.1981) (Texas); Schuemann v. … Schuemann v. Colorado State Board of Adult Parole, 624 F.2d 172, 174 (10th Cir.1980); United States ex rel. Devine v. Fairman, 537 F.Supp. 883, 885 (N.D.Ill.1982).