Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,907 results
0.88s
District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 20, 2021
STEPHANIE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 479 (1989).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMedical Center of Independence v. Califano
433 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 1977
Louis University v. … See Morris v. Weinberger, 401 F.Supp. 1071 (D.Md.1975); Mansfield v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilson v. Lawrence County, Mo.
978 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 16, 1997
See Michael H. v. … Under the Heck v.
Cited 0 timesPublished612 F. Supp. 1400 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 24, 1985
If the Registrants’ cash merger proposal is not accepted by the Issuer’s Board of Directors, the Registrants intend to continue to explore strategies for seeking control. … Barancik v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHardy v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 20, 2019
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 61 (2011) (citing Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHutchens Metal Products, Inc. v. Bookwalter
174 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1959
This is substantially the view taken by Stanton Brewery v. Commissioner and Gallo Winery v. … In Bechelli v.
Reversed on other grounds by E. O. Bookwalter, District Director of Internal Revenue v. Hutchens Metal Products, Inc., 281 F.2d 174 (1960)Cited 4 timesPublishedHeckler v. Reeds Spring R-IV School District
District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 10, 2018
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (1955)). … See Wanamaker v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 20, 2021
STEPHANIE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 479 (1989).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCroman v. City of Kansas City, Mo.
29 F. Supp. 2d 587 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 26, 1997
Reading his pleadings liberally, Haines v. … Spink v. Kemp, 365 Mo. 368 , 283 S.W.2d 502, 514 (Mo. banc 1955); Hasenyager v. Board of Police Comm’nrs of Kansas City, 606 S.W.2d 468, 472-73 (Mo.App.1980).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBigger v. American Commercial Lines, Inc.
652 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 28, 1986
In Hager v. … Employees’ Pension Plan v.
Cited 13 timesPublished193 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1961
This, on the authority of Vaughan v. Compton, Mo.Sup., 235 S.W.2d 328 ; Housman v. Lewellen, 362 Mo. 759 , 244 S.W.2d 21 ; Jackson v. Littell, 213 Mo. 589 , 112 S.W. 53 ; Roth v. … M.S.; Vaughan v. Compton, supra; Housman v. Lewellen, supra; Jackson v. Littell, supra. In so doing, what was said by the Missouri Supreme Court in Shelton v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 2022
“[T]he ALJ bears a responsibility to develop the record fairly and fully, independent of the claimant’s burden. . . . . ” Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016) (quoting Snead v. … See Lawrence v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown8 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 29, 1934
Tagg Bros. v. United States, supra; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Illinois Central R. Co., 215 U. S. 452, 454 , 30 S. Ct. 155 , 54 L. Ed. 280 . The Procedure. 1. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 278 U. S. 24, 36 , 49 S. Ct. 69 , 73 L. Ed. 161 , 62 A. L. R. 805; United Railways & Electric Co. v. West, 280 U. S. 234, 251 , 50 S. Ct. 123 , 74 L. Ed. 390 ; Phillips v.
Cited 10 timesPublished857 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 7, 1994
Butter v. Buechler, 706 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir.1983). In addition, the Court is required to resolve all doubts as to the facts or existence of any material fact against the moving party. Robert Johnson Grain Co. v. … Richmond v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota, 957 F.2d 595 , 598 (8th Cir.1992). Accordingly, the Court enters summary *672 judgment for Defendant on Count II of Plaintiff’s complaint. YI.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNational Fidelity Life Ins. v. United States
4 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 5, 1933
Commissioner v. Western Union Life Insurance Co. (C. C. A. 9) 61 F.(2d) 207 ; Commissioner v. Standard Life Insurance Co. (C. C. A. 3) 47 F.(2d) 218 ; Reserve Loan Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, 18 B. T. … Nothing that I can say can add anything to the reasoning and discussion of the Board of Tax Appeals in that case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 14, 2026
Strategic Energy Concepts, LLC v. … (quoting Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., 243 F.3d 486, 498 (8th Cir. 2001))).
Cited 0 timesUnknownOmaha Indemnity Co. v. Royal American Managers, Inc.
755 F. Supp. 1451 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 4, 1991
Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Leasing Corporation v.
Cited 7 timesPublished111 F. Supp. 3d 989 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 22, 2015
In mid-February 2011 the Career Board recommended to SAC Truchon that he select Plaintiff as the principal relief supervisor for Squad Six, and he did. … Hulsey v.
Cited 6 timesPublished462 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 1978
Eaton v. Wyrick, 527 F.2d 477, 482 (8th Cir. 1975); accord, Smallwood v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 587 F.2d 369, at 371 (8th Cir. 1978). … Sanders v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna