Case law

Taylor v. Swenson

327 F. Supp. 1165 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 4, 1971

On November 24, 1968, at approximately 6:45 a. m., James Frizzell, a Kansas City Transit Company bus driver, stopped his vehicle to allow two young Negro men to board it. … See also: Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); United States v. Wade, supra; Gilbert v. California, supra; Stovall v.

Pollard v. Remington Arms Co.

320 F.R.D. 198 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 14, 2017

Amchem Prods., Inc. v. … Beyond the comprehensive discovery and lengthy settlement negotiations, the parties were forced back to the drawing board in December 2015 when the Court required them to propose a supplemental notice plan.

Egner v. Settle

209 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 27, 1962

Supp. 775 (1962), and Clark v. … In addition there is no evidence that the requisite certificate was filed by the Board of Examiners in order to commence a hearing pursuant to that Section.

Landrith v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 14, 2023

the record on appeal to include two discovery documents: (1) Plaintiff’s initial request for production from Defendant Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.; and (2) Plaintiff’s initial request for production from Defendant Brown … Keating v. Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 2010 WL 2884915, at *1 (D. Neb. July 20, 2010) (quoting United States v. First Nat’l State Bank of New Jersey, 616 F.2d 668, 671 n.4 (3d Cir. 1980)); see United States v.

Town v. Willis

89 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 16, 1950

In Smith v. … In his statement to the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office, the Examiner stated: “Rebasing materials for artificial dentures are old and specifically a rebasing material composed of a fabric impregnated with a gum.

United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.

579 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 31, 1984

Brown v. Georgeoff, 562 F.Supp. 1300, 1303 (N.D.Ohio 1983), quoting Justice Story in Society for Propagating the Gospel v. Wheeler, 22 F.Cas. 756, 767 (C.C.D. N.H.1814) (No. 13,156). … See United States v. Price, 688 F.2d 204 (3d Cir.1982); United States v. Price, 577 F.Supp. 1103 (D.N.J. 1983); State ex rel. Brown v. Georgeoff, 562 F.Supp. 1300 (N.D.Ohio 1983); United States v.

Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen v. BNSF Railway, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 2024

A minor dispute in the railroad industry is subject to compulsory and binding arbitration before the National Railroad Adjust Board. 45 U.S.C. § 153; Consol. Rail Corp. v. Ry. Lab. … The National Railroad Adjustment Board has exclusive jurisdiction over minor disputes. 45 U.S.C. § 153; Union Pacific R. Co. v. Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 93, 99 S.Ct. 399, 402, 58 L.Ed.2d 354 (1978).

Thornburg v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 2021

City of Lee’s Summit v. Browning, 722 S.W.2d 114, 115 ( Mo. Ct. App. 1986). … at 722 (citing Peters v. ContiGroup, 292 S.W.3d 380, 385 (Mo. App. W.D. 2009)). “Compensatory damages can also be granted for inconvenience and discomfort caused by the nuisance.” Id. (citing Brown v.

Lynn v. Bowen

702 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 23, 1988

Anderson v. Heckler, 805 F.2d 801 (8th *772 Cir.1986). Rohrich v. Bowen, 796 F.2d 1030 (8th Cir.1986). … Brown v. Bowen, 827 F.2d 311 (8th Cir.1987).

Verne v. Queen City Roofing & Contracting Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 12, 2018

This concern does not apply to the expenditures by an employee-controlled VEBA board. Plaintiff cites to Miree Constr. Corp v. … See Wright v. Pulaski, 2010 WL 3328015, at *7 (E.D. Ark. 2010) (adopting DOL Guidance); Arnold v. State of Ark., 901 F.Supp. 1385, 1393 (E.D. Ark. 1995) (adopting DOL Guidance); Terrell v.

Mitchell v. Raytown Water

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 20, 2023

Defendants Raytown Water, Raytown Water Board of Directors, and Neal Clevenger’s (“Defendants”)1 oppose the motion arguing, in part, service was never perfected. ECF No. 13. … See L.R. 55.1(a)(2) (requiring a declaration or affidavit outlining such information); see also Boles v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affs., No. 4:14-0634-CV-DGK, 2014 WL 12589314, at *1 (W.D.

Lewis v. McDonough

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 16, 2024

See Bryant v. Bell Atl. … See, e.g., Hill v.

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION d/b/a DELAWARE MCDONALD’S CORP. v. FARRIS BROTHERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, et al.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 9, 2026

In Hogquist v. PACCAR, Inc., No. 3:21-CV-05013-MDH, 2021 WL 6050932 (W.D. Mo. … Plaintiff also cites Kennemore v. Circle of Hope Girls Ranch & Boarding Sch., No. 6:22- CV-03291-MDH, 2023 WL 6448847, at *1 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 3, 2023) (Harpool, J.)

Concerned Citizens for 442nd T.A.W. v. Bodycombe

538 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 8, 1982

Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Butz, 498 F.2d 1314, 1320 (8th Cir. En Banc 1974); McDowell v. Schlesinger, 404 F.Supp. 221, 249 (W.D.Mo.1975). … Brown, 570 F.2d 517, 522 (5th Cir. 1978); Breckinridge v. Rumsfeld, 537 F.2d 864 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1061 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); National Association of Government Employees v.

Meller v. Swenson

309 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1969

Carnley v. Cochran, supra; United States ex rel. Savini v. Jackson (C.A.2) 250 F.2d 349 ; Rimanich v. United States (C.A.5) 357 F.2d 537 ; Lane v. United States (C.A.5) 373 F.2d 570 ; Caffey v. … Carnley v. Cochran, supra; United States ex rel. Savini v. Jackson, supra; Rimanich v. United States, supra; Lane v. United States, supra; Caffey v. Swenson, supra; Pedicord v. Swenson, supra.

Heinitz v. Califano

428 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 8, 1977

Wade, M.D., Board Certified Ophthalmologist, C/E report of 11/28/73” and “Richard M. Childs, M.D., Board Certified Psychiatrist, C/E report of 1/9/74.” … See, e. g., Dunn v.

Fassett v. VendTech-SGI, LLC

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 2018

Sosna v. Binnington, 321 F.3d 742, 744-45 (8th Cir. 2003). “Evidence of other employer actions is admissible when it supports an inference of discrimination.” Bradford v. Norfolk S. … (citations omitted); see also Jain v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 779 F.3d 753, 759 (8th Cir. 2015). The parties focus their arguments on four individuals: Bohrn, Anderson, Brown, and Hill.

Carneal v. Saul

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 15, 2022

Brown v. Astrue, No. 4:09-CV-274–DJS, 2010 WL 889835, at *25 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 8, 2010); see Depover v. … Hayes v. Astrue, No. 2:11-CV-04132-NKL, 2012 WL 393406, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 6, 2012); Brown v. Astrue, No. 4:09CV274-DJS, 2010 WL 889835, at *25 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 8, 2010); Proffitt v. Astrue, No.

Campbell v. Reisch

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 8, 2019

Sys., Inc. v. Democratic Nat. … In arriving at this conclusion, the Fourth Circuit emphasized that Randall’s post to the Page prompting Davison’s comment “informed the public about what happened at the Loudoun Board and Loudoun County School Board’s

Johnson-Bey v. Armontrout

704 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 6, 1989

Collins v. … McNary v. Stussie, 518 S.W.2d 630 (Mo. banc 1974); and Deppe v. Board of Jury Supervisors of St. Louis County, Missouri, 351 F.Supp. 965 (E.D.Mo.1972).