Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmowd

1,907 results

1.21s

  • Fulsom v. United-Buckingham Freight Lines, Inc.

    324 F. Supp. 135 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 30, 1970

    See Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335 , 84 S.Ct. 363 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 ; [National] Labor [Relations] Board v. Miranda Fuel Co. [2 Cir.,] 326 F.2d 172 . … The exception mentioned in Republic Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Heilman v. American Family Mutual Insurance

    931 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 5, 1996

    Thompson v. … Berry v. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. Der Wienerschnitzel International, Inc.

    313 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 1970

    In Sosa v. … Moritz v. Rivers, 175 Kan. 809 , 267 P.2d 506 , wherein it was held that a Civil Aeronautics Board accident investigation report was hearsay and inadmissible in litigation respecting the crash of an airplane.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Byers Transp. Co. v. United States

    48 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 14, 1942

    See Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U.S. 177, 197 , 61 S.Ct. 845, 853 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 , 133 A.L.R. 1217 . As stated in Twin City Milk Producers Ass’n v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fish v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 2020

    See Brown v. Colvin, No. 4:14-CV-00288-NKL, 2014 WL 6750041, at *3 (W.D. Mo. … Dec. 1, 2014) (“The ALJ has a duty to fully and fairly develop the record, and the ALJ should have sought an opinion from one of Brown's treating physicians or ordered a consultative examination to assess Brown's RFC. )

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • King v. United States

    914 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 30, 1995

    Umpleby v. United States, 806 F.2d 812, 814 (1986). However, as the Supreme Court noted in Celotex Corp. v. … No single fact is dispositive as to whether an individual is a responsible person, but such facts include whether a person: (1) is an officer, director or member of the board of directors, (2) owns substantial stock in the

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Swenson

    288 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 16, 1968

    Powell v. … Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546, 84 S.Ct. 1733 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1964); Howard v. Smyth, (4th Cir. 1966) 365 F.2d 428 ; Brown v. McGinnis, 1962, 10 N.Y.2d 531 , 225 N.Y.S.2d 497 , 180 N.E.2d 791 . 2 .

    Modified by Burns v. Swenson, 300 F. Supp. 759 (1969)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • American Pastoral Co. v. Gurney

    61 F. 41 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 23, 1894

    In substance, the same ruling was made in Railway Co. v. Fairelough, 3 Scott, N. R. 68. In Stone v. City & County Bank, 3 C. P. … Div. 209, and Johnson v. Iron Agency, 5 Ch. Div. 687.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kelton v. United States

    394 F. Supp. 173 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 7, 1975

    United States v. Sockel, supra; United States v. Jones, supra; Johnson v. United States, supra. … Brown v. Swenson, 487 F.2d 1236, 1240 (8th Cir. 1973); Robinson v. United States, 448 F.2d 1255 (8th Cir. 1973) ; Scalf v. Bennett, 408 F.2d 325, 327-328 (8th Cir. 1969); Cardarella v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gasca v. Precythe

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 12, 2020

    BACKGROUND In Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972) and Gagnon v. … (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 554-55 (1974)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hurley v. VendTech-SGI, LLC

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 26, 2018

    (citations omitted); see also Jain v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 779 F.3d 753, 759 (8th Cir. 2015). The parties focus their arguments on four individuals: Bohrn, Anderson, Brown, and Hill. … Moore v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 825 S.W.2d 839, 842-43 (Mo. banc 1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Khoshneviszadeh v. Sams West, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 19, 2022

    June 20, 2013); see also Knudson v. Sys. … See Christiansen v. W. Branch Cmty. Sch.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ranschburg v. Toan

    540 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 11, 1982

    Arkansas Education Association v. Board of Education of the Portland Arkansas School District, 446 F.2d 763 (8th Cir. 1971). … Medora v. Colautti, 602 F.2d 1149, 1154 (3d Cir. 1979).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dunn v. Richardson

    325 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 22, 1971

    “Examination of the claimant by a Board certified neurologist reveals that he can find no objective evidence establishing disability in the claimant. … Bohms v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Dubois v. EPA

    646 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 22, 1986

    V. … NOTES [1] See State Water Control Board v. Train, 559 F.2d 921 , 927 n. 34 (4th Cir.1977); Caldwell v. Gurley Refining Co., 533 F.Supp. 252, 255-57 (E.D.Ark.1982); Zemansky v. EPA, No. A81-274, slip op. at 2 (D.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Empire Gas Corp.

    419 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 9, 1976

    United States v. Morton Salt Co., 358 U.S. 632 , 70 S.Ct. 357 , 94 L.Ed. 401 (1950); Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946); Civil Aeronautics Board v. … See Refiners Ass’n v. Dunlop, 486 F.2d 1388 (Em. App.1973); United States v. Ohio, 487 F.2d 936 (Em.App.1973); see also Delaware Valley Apartment House Owners Ass'n v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DuBois v. Environmental Protection Agency

    646 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 22, 1986

    V. … See State Water Control Board v. Train, 559 F.2d 921 , 927 n. 34 (4th Cir.1977); Caldwell v. Gurley Refining Co., 533 F.Supp. 252, 255-57 (E.D.Ark.1982); Zemansky v. EPA, No. A81-274, slip op. at 2 (D.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mjolsness v. Ciccone

    311 F. Supp. 1014 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 23, 1969

    Petitioner states that he was charged in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota with failing to report to “Selective Service Board No. 47 for Induction” and was subsequently committed by that Court … These events took place after the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Johnson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Briegel v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 8, 2021

    Brown v. Astrue, No. 4:09-CV-274–DJS, 2010 WL 889835, at *25 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 8, 2010); see Depover v. … Hayes v. Astrue, No. 2:11-CV-04132-NKL, 2012 WL 393406, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 6, 2012); Schuler v. Astrue, No. 07-3360-CV-S-JCE-SSA, 2009 WL 613556, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 9, 2009); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Alhilfy v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 9, 2021

    Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016). “Substantial evidence” is less than a preponderance but enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the ALJ’s conclusion. Milam v. … Brown, 825 F.3d at 939.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.