Case law

Scott Family Properties, LP v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

190 F. Supp. 3d 864 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 2016

Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia, 535 U.S. 613, 618 , 122 S.Ct. 1640 , 152 L.Ed.2d 806 (2002). Plaintiff argues that the Commission has waived its immunity. … July 16, 2013) (rejecting argument under Lapides that state entity waived immunity over state law claims by removing action); Johnson v. Board of Police Comm’rs, 4:06CV605 CDP, 2007 WL 1629909 , at *3-4 (E.D.Mo.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United Transportation Union

580 F. Supp. 1490 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 1, 1984

Locomotive Engineers v. … emergency board appointed by the President, a settlement is not reached.”

Essex Ins. Co. v. McManus

299 F. Supp. 2d 939 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 19, 2003

Cockerham, Brown and James, P.C., Ryan J. Gavin, Greensfelder and Hemker, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. John McManus, St. Louis, MO, Pro se. Karl W. Dickhaus, Dickhaus and Associates, LC, Joseph B. Moore, Office of U.S. … Brown, 31 F.R.D. 185 , (W.D.Mo.1962) ("Defendants have failed to reply to the Request for Admissions .... Under Rule 36 such requested admissions must be treated as true ....

Level 3 Communications v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO

405 F. Supp. 2d 1047 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 2005

White v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 904 F.2d 456, 458 (8th Cir.1990) (quoting InterRoyal Corp. v. … City of Rancho Palos Verdes v.

Aunhkhotep v. Thomas

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 29, 2025

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … See Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 256 (2006).

Johnson v. Lark

365 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 13, 1973

Williams v. United States, 405 F.2d 951, 954 (9th Cir. 1969); Brown v. United States, 342 F.Supp. 987, 992 (E.D.Ark. 1972). Cf. Farkas v. … Avery, 393 U.S. 483 , 89 S.Ct. 747 , 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969); Lee v. Tahash, supra ; Sigafus v. Brown, 416 F.2d 105, 107 (7th Cir. 1969); Coleman v.

Angell v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co.

421 F. Supp. 2d 1168 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 13, 2006

v. … Brown, 190 F.3d at 858 (quoting Gluck, 960 F.2d at 1177 ) (emphasis added).

Delmo Housing Corp. v. Finnegan

85 F. Supp. 220 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 1949

The by-laws provide that members ,of thp Corporation shall be elected by the Board of Directors; the Board of Directors shall consist of nine -members, elected by the members at the Annual Meeting. … See Bohemian Gymnastic Ass’n v. Higgins, supra; Roche’s Beach’ v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 96 F.2d 776 ; Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden etc., 263 U.S. 578 , 44 S.Ct. 204 , 68 L.Ed. 458 ; Salvation Army v.

United States v. Commercial Am. Barge Line Co.

424 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 4, 1977

Cf., The Oregon, 158 U.S. 186 , 15 S.Ct. 804 , 39 L.Ed. 943 (1895); Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 377 F.2d 724 (5th Cir.1967). … United States v. The M/V Martin, 198 F.Supp. 171, 176 (S.D.Ill.1961), aff'd, 313 F.2d 851 (7th Cir. 1963). See also, United States v. The Terry E. Buchanan, 138 F.Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y.1956).

Monsanto Company v. Port of St. Louis Investments, Inc.

350 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 11, 1972

Moser, Marsalek, Carpenter, Cleary, Jaeckel, Keaney & Brown, St. Louis, Mo., for Port of St. Louis Investments, Inc. Warren M. Faris, New Orleans, La., Joseph M. Kortenhof, Wayne L. … Thomas v.

Knickerbocker Toy Co., Inc. v. Genie Toys Inc.

491 F. Supp. 526 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1980

In Ferguson v. … Wihtol v. Crow, 309 F.2d 777 (8th Cir. 1962). Nor would defendant's ignorance of plaintiff's copyright be of any help to it in defending a copyright infringement action. DeAcosta v. Brown, 146 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1944).

Jones v. Houser

489 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 5, 1980

JONES et al., Plaintiffs, v. Myron V. HOUSER et al., Defendants. No. S79-0076C. United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, Southeastern Division. May 5, 1980. *796 Michael L. … The County Court should be apprised of conditions in the jail by the board of county visitors. §§ 221.340 and 221.350.

Johnston v. Mesmer

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 6, 2024

Brown then found plaintiff guilty of the conduct violation. /d. … See Camberos v.

Steward v. Lewis

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 6, 2022

Brown v. Davenport, 142 S. Ct. 1510, 1530 (2022). And Steward’s reliance on State court decisions to argue otherwise is misplaced. … Cox v.

Lacey v. Marsh

741 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 1990

United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 715 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1481 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … . § 2000e-2(h); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 , 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1093 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

East Prairie R-2 School Dist. v. US Gypsum Co.

813 F. Supp. 1396 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 16, 1993

In Young v. … In Kansas City v. W.R.

Shrum v. Uebinger

559 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 25, 1983

Defendant has consistently abided by the decisions of the advisory board regarding employment decisions. 4. … Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1195 (4th Cir.1980), citing Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School Dist., 439 U.S. 410, 416-17 , 99 S.Ct. 693, 697 , 58 L.Ed.2d 619 ; Mound City Health Board of Education v.

Blakeney v. City of Pine Lawn, Missouri

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 3, 2021

Armer v. City of Salem, 861 F.2d 514, 515 (8th Cir.1988) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). It is uncontroverted that plaintiff was employed as a police officer by the City of Pine Lawn. … Brown v. Blakeney, et al., Case No. 4:17- cv-01542-ERW; Ford v. Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:19-cv-01708- SRC; Schweppe v. City of Pine Lawn, et al, Case No. 4:16-cv-00253-JAR.

FORT ZUMWALT v. Missouri State Bd. of Educ.

923 F. Supp. 1216 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 1, 1996

923 F.Supp. 1216 (1996) FORT ZUMWALT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. MISSOURI STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. No. 4:93CV01710. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri. May 1, 1996. *1217 *1218 Teri B. … In Missouri, the appeal is to the State Board of Education; the Board designates a statelevel review officer to handle the case. Mo.

In Re Missouri Pac. R. Co.

13 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 1935

C., being a secured creditor of the debtor, heretofore filed a motion in this court, in effect averring that the debtor, through its then officers and board of directors, had on December 31, 1930, and prior to the commencement … Co. v. Seely, 45 Mo. 212 , 100 Am.Dec. 369. A corporation, and a railroad is no exception to the rule, can lawfully exercise such powers and such powers only as are conferred on it by its charter. Hamburg Bank v.