Case law

Mills & Exports Co. v. Fleischman

25 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 9, 1938

Louis Steel Range Co. v. Kline-Drummond M. Co., 120 Mo.App. 438, 96 S.W. 1040 , loc. cit. 1042. … Co. v. St. Louis Car Co., 210 Mo. 715 , 109 S.W. 47 ; Brown v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co., 210 Mo. 260 , 109 S.W. 22 ; Weber Motor Car Co. v. Roberts, 203 Mo.App. 509 , 219 S.W. 994 ; Berger Mfg. Co. v.

Hooper v. Esper

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 1, 2020

He alleged that employees of the Army Review Board Agency were given this opportunity. … A party remains under a duty to take legal steps to protect his own interests.”); see also Brown v. Patrick, 2009 WL 8654547, at *1 (E.D. Va.

Sherwood Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

875 F. Supp. 590 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 1995

Wells was given an opportunity to appeal this to the Ford Dealer Policy Board. … Wells met with the board in Detroit and was given one final opportunity. He did nothing to take advantage of that opportunity.

Hill v. Group Three Housing Development Corp.

620 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 4, 1985

The controlling case on this issue is Board of Regents v. … The court analogized the plaintiffs claims to those asserted by the untenured professor in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 540 (1972).

Wilfley v. Hellmich

56 F.2d 845 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 1929

Barnhart was made chairman of the board of directors. That shortly after October 14, 1919, said William It. Barnhart again consulted the attorney of the company, who had drawn the will of William R. … V. If the taxing officials acted in reliance on the presumption that because the transfers of stock in question were made within two years previous to the death of William R.

Delta and Pine Land Co. v. Sinkers Corp.

197 F. Supp. 2d 1184 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 2001

Asgrow Seed Company v. Winterboer, 513 U.S. 179, 185-86 , 115 S.Ct. 788 , 130 L.Ed.2d 682 (1995). In Delta and Pine Land Company v. … Pub.L. 103-349, §§ 14(a), 15; 108 Stat. 3144 , 3145. [2] See also Delta and Pine Land Company v.

In re Howard

109 B.R. 382 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 30, 1989

See, e.g., In re Speck, 798 F.2d 279 (8th Cir.1986); Brown v. First Nat. Bank In Lenox, 844 F.2d 580, 581 (8th Cir.1988). … See also, Gibbs v. Housing Authority of City of New Haven, 76 B.R. 257, 262 (D.Conn.1983) (forbearance fully discharged obligation of Authority, contract governing repayment was not executory). 4.

United States v. One Hundred Barrels of Cement

27 F. Cas. 292 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 15, 1862

[Ennis v. Smith] 14 How. [55 U. S.] 424; [Black v. Zacharie] 3 How. [44 U. S.] 483; [The Venus] 8 Cranch [12 U. S.] 253; [U. S. v. Guillem] 11 How. [52 U. S.] 47; 1 C. Rob. Adm. 86, 102; U. S. v. … S.] 451; 16 Johns. 438 ; [Scholefield v. Eichelberger] 7 Pet. [32 U. S.] 586; 1 C. Rob. Adm. 84; 2 Brown, Civ. & Adm. Law, 313,314; 1 Kent, Comm. 143.

Rich v. Bob Downes Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

831 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 2, 1993

Foster v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 787 F.2d 390, 392 (8th Cir.1986). … Hill v. John Chezik Imports, 869 F.2d 1122, 1124 (8th Cir.1989). A presumption exists that the notice was received three days after its mailing. Ballwin County Welcome Center v.

Islam v. Phegley

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 18, 2021

Brown-El v. Delo, 969 F.2d 644, 647 (8th Cir. 1992). … Spence v. Farrier, 807 F.2d 753, 756 (8th Cir. 1986). As such, due process is satisfied as long as “some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board.” Td.

United States v. Certain Land in City of St. Louis, Mo.

29 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 7, 1939

Bannon v. Burnes, 1899, C.C., 39 F. 892 ; United States v. Pierce County, 1912, D.C., 193 F. 529 ; United States v. City of Buffalo, 1931, 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 471 . See, also, Gillmor v. … Louis Charter provides that the Board of Estimate and Apportionment shall submit and recommend to the Board of Aldermen a bill establishing the city tax rate for the fiscal year and further provides that if the Board of Aldermen

Odom v. Tripp

575 F. Supp. 1491 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1983

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528 (8th Cir.1979). As the Eighth Circuit stated in Roberts, id. at 531 , "[s]ummary judgment is a harsh remedy and should be granted sparingly. … Owen v. Shuler, 466 F.Supp. 5, 7 (N.D.Ind.1977), aff'd, 594 F.2d 867 (7th Cir.1979); Engblom v.

Huckshold v. HSSL, LLC

344 F. Supp. 2d 1203 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 16, 2004

Berge v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Ala., 104 F.3d 1453, 1463 (4th Cir.1997) (Board of Trustees ). … See National Car Rental Sys., Inc. v. Computer Assocs. Int'l, 991 F.2d 426, 428 (8th Cir.1993); Lipscher v. LRP Publications, Inc., 266 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2001); Board of Trustees, 104 F.3d at 1463 .

McClaskey v. LA PLATA R-II SCHOOL DIST.

364 F. Supp. 2d 1041 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 25, 2005

In Scherer v. … See also Cunningham v.

Hardin v. Strickland Transportation Co.

404 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 7, 1975

Gulf & South American Steamship Co., Inc. v. … Hensley v. United Transports, Inc., 346 F.Supp. 1108 (N.D.Texas 1972) See also, Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335 , 84 S.Ct. 363 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 (1964); Ford Motor Co. v.

Powell v. Shelton

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 19, 2020

For Map Kong v. … Swearingen v.

McGraw Electric Co. v. United States

120 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 1954

See National Labor Relations Board v. Stocker Mfg. Co., 3 Cir., 185 F.2d 451 . Due process of law under the Fifth Amendment does not necessarily require that oral argument be granted. … See also Johnson & Wimsatt v. Hazen, 69 App.D.C. 151 , 99 F.2d 384 ; Mitchell v. Reichelderfer, 61 App.D.C. 50 , 57 F.2d 416 ." See, also, Sisto v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 31 , 179 F.2d 47 .

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fiala

870 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 12, 1994

Gershman, 829 F.Supp. at 1101 (quoting Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors, 744 S.W.2d 524, 532 (Mo.App. 1988)). See also Fowler v. … This rationale applies even if the board's conduct does not rise to the level of fraud or purposeful misconduct. See RTC v.

Donelson

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 2026

Parkhurst v. Tabor, 569 F.3d 861, 865 (8th Cir. 2009) (citation modified); see also Braden v. … Linda R.S. v.

State of Mo. Ex Rel. Gore v. Wochner

475 F. Supp. 274 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 1979

Louis Board of Aldermen. … Vorbeck v. McNeal, 560 S.W.2d 245 (Mo. App.1977). See also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).