Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

1.69s

  • St. Louis Typographical Union No. 8 v. Herald Co.

    277 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 13, 1967

    Jefferson School of Social Science v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 118 U.S.App. D.C. 2, 331 F.2d 76, 83 . … Heinz Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 514, 526 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc., supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schweiss v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

    782 F. Supp. 88 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 22, 1992

    See Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1311 (6th Cir.1989) (burden shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas v. … Brousard-Norcross v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pariser v. Christian Health Care Systems, Inc.

    627 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 17, 1986

    McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, 444 U.S. 232, 241 , 100 S.Ct. 502, 508 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980); Hospital Building Company v. … Hayden v. Bracy, 744 F.2d 1338 (1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ramaswamy v. Burwell

    83 F. Supp. 3d 846 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 6, 2015

    Heckler v. … See, e.g., Thorbus v. Bowen, 848 F.2d 901, 903 (8th Cir.1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miener v. State of Mo.

    498 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 19, 1980

    Such services can and should be provided at the Brown School is (sic) Austin, Texas, at no cost to the Plaintiff, Clyde J. Miener. … United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 , 86 S.Ct. 1130, 1139 , 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966). Though dismissal in the present situation is discretionary, Kuhn v. Nat.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bruce v. Scearce

    390 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 1975

    The City employs approximately 9,000 persons who are compensated pursuant to a plan enacted [2] by the City's Board of Aldermen. … The discrimination complained of here involves no violation of a fundamental right, e. g. suffrage, Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ben Gutman Truck Serv. v. Teamsters Local No. 600

    484 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 29, 1980

    Fire & Eng. v. National Mediation Board, 133 U.S.App. D.C. 326, 410 F.2d 1025 (D.C.App.Ct.1969); cf. Brotherhood of Ry. & S. S. Clerks v. United Air Lines, 325 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1963). … Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938); Frey v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dunham v. City of O'Fallon, Mo.

    945 F. Supp. 1256 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 13, 1996

    The Department implemented a mandatory physical health and fitness program in June 1990 at the direction of the Board of Aldermen and the Mayor. Id. at ¶¶ 5-7. In September 1990, Mr. … Thus, Count V of the complaint does not state an independent claim for relief. [4] See Franz v. Kernan, No. 4:93CV1143 CEJ (E.D.Mo.); Faulkenberry v. City of O'Fallon, No. 4:95CV117 JCH (E.D.Mo.).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United States v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co.

    346 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 21, 1972

    Defendant made no claim to have employed a “header board”. … Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. United States, 330 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1963). Such violation “is one that is conscious and intentional, deliberate and voluntary, rather than merely negligent.” United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. City of Maplewood Chief of Police

    710 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 3, 1989

    Lyons v. Board of Education of Charleston, 523 F.2d 340, 347 (8th Cir.1975). … Tyler v. Harper, 744 F.2d 653, 655 (8th Cir.1984) (citing Migra v. Warren City School District, Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56, 61 (1984)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Becker Metals Corp. v. Transportation Ins. Co.

    802 F. Supp. 235 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 25, 1992

    James, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, Mo., Stephen Sonderby, Peter Bora, Haskell & Perrin, Chicago, Ill., for defendants. MEMORANDUM LIMBAUGH, District Judge. … Patty Precision v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co., 742 F.2d 1260, 1264 (10th Cir.1984). Becker has failed to show how this information could aid its position in opposing defendants' motion for summary judgment.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bank of New Orleans and Trust Co. v. Big B Towboat Services, Inc.

    435 F. Supp. 997 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 29, 1977

    Byron Sims, Brown, Teed, Sims, Ayre, Glassman & *998 Luther, Houston, Tex., for B-421 Inc. and Hollywood Marine Inc. John E. Galloway, McGlinchey, Stafford, Mintz & Hoffman, New Orleans, La., for Blue Ridge Ins. Co. A. … Gordon Grant, Jr., Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Read, New Orleans, La., for Birney A. Rousselle, d/b/a/ etc. Charles Hanemann, Houma, La., for Big B Towboat Services, Inc. Wray & Robinson, Baton Rouge, La., and Frank E.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Haley v. Fiechter

    953 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 1997

    Hicks v. Resolution Trust Co., 767 F.Supp. 167, 172 (N.D.Ill.1991), aff'd 970 F.2d. 378 (7th Cir.1992); see, O'Connell v. … Key Tronic Corp. v. U.S., 511 U.S. 809, 814-16 , 114 S.Ct. 1960, 1965 , 128 L.Ed.2d 797 (1994); Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160, 185-86 , 96 S.Ct. 2586, 2601-02 , 49 L.Ed.2d 415 (1976); Alyeska Pipeline Service v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United Development Company v. United States

    212 F. Supp. 664 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 7, 1962

    Loco Realty Company v. Commissioner, supra; Massillon-Cleveland-Akron Sign Co. v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 79 . … The Third Circuit in McCaffrey v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Snyder v. Harris

    268 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 27, 1967

    Pinel v. Pinel, supra, specifically states, 240 U.S. 594 , 36 S.Ct. l. c. 417, 60 L. … See also DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., D.C., 259 F.Supp. 193 , l. c. 195, note 5.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hooper v. Esper

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 1, 2020

    He alleged that employees of the Army Review Board Agency were given this opportunity. … A party remains under a duty to take legal steps to protect his own interests.”); see also Brown v. Patrick, 2009 WL 8654547, at *1 (E.D. Va.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Davis v. American General Life & Acc. Ins. Co.

    906 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 31, 1995

    She indicated to the interviewer that she had already passed several portions of the Arkansas state boards. … of Cosmetology regarding plaintiff's board exams, Dr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Landfried v. TERMINAL RR ASS'N OF ST. LOUIS

    554 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 15, 1982

    Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 153 First (i), disputes between an employee and a railroad concerning the interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Railroad Adjustment Board … Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 406 U.S. 320 , 92 S.Ct. 1562 , 32 L.Ed.2d 95 (1972); Raus v. Brotherhood Ry. Carmen, 663 F.2d 791 (8th Cir. 1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barnes

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 29, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). … See Young v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • St. Louis Trade Diverters v. Constitution State

    738 F. Supp. 1269 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 7, 1990

    Righetti v. Shell Oil Co., 711 F.Supp. 531 (N.D.Cal.1989); Heininger v. Wecare Distributors, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 860 (S.D. Fla.1989). … See Anderson v. Home Ins. Co., 724 F.2d 82, 84 (8th Cir.1983).

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.