Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

3.74s

  • Simon v. ST. LOUIS CTY., MO.

    497 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1980

    See generally, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Kennedy v. Robb, 547 F.2d 408 (8th Cir. 1976). … Id. at 77 [citing for the proposition that irrebuttable presumptions are improper, Cleveland Board of Education v. La Fleur, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974) and Stanley v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kinloch Telephone Co. v. Local Union No. 2 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    265 F. 312 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 6, 1920

    Stephens v. Telephone Co. (D. C.) 240 Fed. 759 ; Duplex Co. v. Deering (D. C.) 247 Fed. 192 . … In the case of Stephens v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kendrick v. Commission of Zoological Subdistrict

    427 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 22, 1976

    Defendants contend that plaintiff may proceed only by way of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and cite the Court to Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … See Percy v. Brennan, 384 F.Supp. 800 (S.D.N.Y.1974).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Evans v. St. Louis Housing Authority

    689 F. Supp. 970 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 26, 1988

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). A property interest exists where an individual possesses "a legitimate claim of entitlement" to a particular benefit. … Codd v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.

    496 F. Supp. 215 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 28, 1980

    Brown v. Bathke, 588 F.2d 634 (8th Cir. 1978); Crain, supra. … Sherrill v. J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc., 441 F.Supp. 846 (W.D. N.C.1977), aff'd 594 F.2d 858 (4th Cir. 1978); Phillips v. Moore, 441 F.Supp. 833 (W.D.N. C.1977); Francia v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Landmark Bank v. McGlinn

    684 F. Supp. 1500 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 27, 1988

    In Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. … Co. v. J.C. Nichols Co., 728 S.W.2d 611, 618 (Mo.App.1987); AAA Excavating, Inc. v. Francis Constr., Inc., 678 S.W.2d 889, 893 (Mo.App.1984); Springdale Gardens, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sheet Metal Wkrs. Int. Ass'n, LU No. 36

    280 F. Supp. 719 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 7, 1968

    Seals v. Wiman, 304 F.2d 53 (5th Cir. 1962); Rabinowitz v. United States, 366 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1966). … For example, in the case of Cypress v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Yaris v. Special School Dist. of St. Louis County

    661 F. Supp. 996 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 29, 1987

    See also Board of Education of the East Windsor Regional School District v. … See Smith, 468 U.S. at 1009-13 , 104 S.Ct. at 3466-69 (EHA not simply a funding statute); Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Defur v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

    677 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 26, 1988

    Kennedy v. Dixon, 439 S.W.2d 173, 181-186 (Mo. banc 1969) (torts); Brown v. Brown, 678 S.W.2d 831, 833 (Mo.App.1984) (contracts). … Turner v. Floyd C. Reno & Sons, Inc., 696 P.2d 76, 77-79 (Wyo.1985); Kincheloe v. Milatzo, 678 P.2d 855, 859-861 (Wyo.1984); Remilong v. Crolla, 576 P.2d 461, 463-465 (Wyo.1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alton and Southern Lodge No. 306 v. Alton and Southern Ry.

    651 F. Supp. 1190 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 14, 1987

    Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, 655 F.2d 155, 158 (8th Cir.1981). … See Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO-CLC, v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wiles v. Capitol Indem. Corp.

    204 F. Supp. 2d 1207 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 10, 2002

    Cooper, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Capital Indem. Corp. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HAMILTON, District Judge. … Chambers v. NASCO, 501 U.S. 32, 51-52 , 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2136-37 , 115 L.Ed.2d 27, 49-50 (1991), citing Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers v. Stanbury

    811 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 11, 1992

    Litton Financial Printing Division, A Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 111 S.Ct. 2215, 2225 , 115 L.Ed.2d 177 (1991). … Litton Financial Printing Division, A Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 111 S.Ct. 2215, 2222 , 115 L.Ed.2d 177 (1991) (quoting Gateway Coal Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Slotkin v. Human Development Corp. of Metropolitan

    454 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1978

    Barela v. United Nuclear Corporation, 462 F.2d 149 (10th Cir. 1972); Pettway v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, 411 F.2d 998 (5th Cir. 1969); EEOC v. … United States v. Hayes International Corp., 6 FEP 1328 (N.D.Ala.1973); Tidwell v. American Oil Company, 332 F.Supp. 424 (D.Utah 1971).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Emmanuel v. Marsh

    628 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 31, 1986

    Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 824-35 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1963-69 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1481-82 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Higgins v. JC Penney, Inc.

    630 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 1986

    In support of this contention, plaintiff cites Cherry v. … These regulations represent the Federal Reserve Board's view as to the amount of specificity necessary to comply with the statute.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Torimino v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS, ETC.

    548 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 20, 1982

    Board of Trustees of the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, 542 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir. 1976). … Johnson v. Botica, 537 F.2d 930, 936-37 (7th Cir. 1976).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Police Retirement System v. Midwest Inv. Ad. Serv.

    706 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 10, 1989

    Id. ( citing Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Co., 489 F.2d 579, 595 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 873 , 95 S.Ct. 134 , 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974)). See also Brown v. … Like the courts of appeals, the nation's district courts are also spread across the board on the "touching" requirement.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Holder

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 2, 2020

    Brown v. Nix, 33 F.3d 951, 954 (8th Cir. 1994). However, “[r]outine discomfort is part of the penalty that criminal offenders pay for their offenses against society. . .” Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 9, (1992). … Brown v. Bailey, 210 S.W.3d 397, 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barger v. City of St. Louis

    518 F. Supp. 924 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 25, 1981

    Health City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 576 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Schmidt v. Fremont County School District No. 25, 558 F.2d 982 (10th Cir. 1977). … Doyle, supra; Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). The Court concludes that plaintiff’s speech was constitutionally protected.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kelleher v. Aerospace Community Credit Union

    927 F. Supp. 361 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 1996

    Brown, Centralia, IL, for plaintiff. James N. Foster, Jr., John F. Kuenstler, McMahon and Berger, St. Louis, MO, for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HAMILTON, Chief Judge. … See Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co., 740 F.Supp. 127 (N.D.N.Y.1990); House v. Cannon Mills Co., 713 F.Supp. 159 (M.D.N.C.1988); Wasilchuk v. Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc., 610 F.Supp. 206 (D.Nev. 1985); Coffin v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.