Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,318 results
0.79s
Doe v. Special School District
637 F. Supp. 1138 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 2, 1986
Contra Cole v. … Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F.2d 1205, 1238 (7th Cir.1984); Mattis v. Schnarr, 502 F.2d 588 (8th Cir.1974); see also Trujillo v. Board of County Commissioners, 768 F.2d 1186 (10th Cir.1985); Kelson v.
Cited 2 timesPublished383 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 14, 1974
BROCK et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jack B. BUNTON et al., Defendants. No. 73 C 374(1). United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D. August 14, 1974. Louis Gilden, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs. … Plaintiffs' specific charges have been ruled on by the National Labor Relations Board which found there was no basis for the charges and refused to issue a complaint thereon. 8.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Iron Workers St. Louis District Council Pension Trust v. KPS Rebar, LLC
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BOARD OF TRUSTEES … See Greater Kansas City Laborers Pension Fund v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown29 F. Supp. 2d 572 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 28, 1998
See Duff v. United States, 999 F.2d 1280, 1281-82 (8th Cir.1993); Kirchmann v. United States, 8 F.3d 1273, 1277 (8th Cir.1993). … Layton v. United States, 984 F.2d 1496, 1500 (8th Cir.1993), citing Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536-37 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFoley v. Special School Dist. of St. Louis County
927 F. Supp. 1214 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 29, 1996
Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. at 863 , 102 S.Ct. at 2806 . … Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3050-51 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982).
Cited 4 timesPublished618 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 26, 1984
Brown, St. Louis, Mo., George Weisz, New York City, F. Wm. McCalpin, Richard A. Ahrens, St. Louis, Mo., Hunton & Williams, Joseph M. Spivey, III, Richmond, Va., Stephen D. Busey, James J. … United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., 19 Env't.Rep.Cas. 2186, 2187 (W.D.Mo. Sept. 30, 1983); United States v. Wade, 20 Env't.Rep.Cas. 1853, 1855 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 21, 1984); United *38 States v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGriffin-El v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
835 F. Supp. 1114 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 27, 1993
Brown v. Brienen, 722 F.2d 360, 364 (7th Cir.1983). … The Eighth Circuit recently discussed the qualified immunity doctrine in Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDouglas v. University Hospital
150 F.R.D. 165 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 21, 1993
Eliasen v. Hamilton, 111 F.R.D. 396, 400 (N.D.Ill.1986). … The parties have cited only one case, Viterbo v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedLiddell v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.
687 F. Supp. 1368 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 16, 1988
687 F.Supp. 1368 (1988) Craton LIDDELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO., et al., Defendants. No. 72-100C(5). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. May 26, 1988. … Kenneth V. Byrne, St. Louis, Mo., for Valley Park School Dist. Craig M. Crenshaw, Jr., Jeremiah Glassman, U.S.
Cited 2 timesPublishedQuick Point Pencil Co. v. Aronson
425 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 1976
An appeal was filed in the Patent Office to the Board of Appeals and on September 27, 1961, the Board of Patent Appeals held this was an unpatentable invention. 9. … This case is not controlled by Compco Corporation v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 , 84 S.Ct. 779 , 11 L.Ed.2d 669 (1964) and Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.
Reversed by Quick Point Pencil Company, a Missouri Corporation v. Jane Aronson (Formerly Known as Jane Leopoldi), 567 F.2d 757 (1978)Cited 2 timesPublishedSolomon Temple M.B. Church v. City of St. Louis
980 F. Supp. 1064 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 16, 1997
Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir.1977). … Furthermore, under the City’s Charter, the Mayor has veto power of any bill adopted by the Board of Aldermen, and if the Mayor so chooses to veto a bill adopted by the Board, the Board can only pass the bill (and it becomes
Cited 0 timesPublishedINTERN. ASS'N OF MACHINISTS v. General Dynamics
821 F. Supp. 1306 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 24, 1993
Problems identified during the CDR were discussed at three Design Review Boards. … Jones v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedIndependent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
918 F. Supp. 293 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 12, 1996
Hawaiian Airlines v. Norris, — U.S. at ——, 114 S.Ct. at 2244 ; Consolidated Rail Corp. v. … Thus, Section 184 of the RLA requires that minor disputes, involving the airline industry,- are subject to compulsory and binding arbitration before the System Board of Adjustment. Air Line Pilots Ass’n. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrisch v. Casavely-Machens Ford, Inc.
497 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 1980
Id., Warren v. Credithrift of America, Inc., 599 F.2d 829 (7th Cir. 1979). The very format involved in this case was examined in Murphy v. … Federal Reserve Board staff opinions construing the Act or the accompanying regulation are to be considered dis-positive unless demonstrably irrational. Ford Motor Credit Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 23, 2022
Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … The Board's consideration of granting conditional 3Missouri Revised Statute § 217.690 gives the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole almost unlimited discretion in whether to grant parole. Winfrey v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BREWERY DRIV. & H., ETC., LOC. NO. 133
346 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 1972
Textile Workers Union of America v. Lincoln Mills, 353 U.S. 448 , 77 S.Ct. 912 , 1 L.Ed.2d 972 (1957); United Steelworkers of America v. … Bonnot v.
Cited 2 timesPublished717 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 1989
Although the Supreme Court in Carpenter v. … Defendants rely upon United States v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRowald v. Cargo Carriers, Inc.
243 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 7, 1965
Corp. v. Taylor, 303 U.S. 525 , 58 S.Ct. 651 , 82 L.Ed. 993 (1938), and Farrell v. … The Court in Travis v.
Cited 2 timesPublished346 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 26, 1972
In Gurton v. … See also Williams v. International Typographical Union, 423 F.2d 1295, 1297 (C.A. 10, 1970), cert. den. 400 U.S. 824 , 91 S.Ct. 47 , 27 L.Ed.2d 53 . The court in Cefalo v.
Cited 0 timesPublished391 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 6, 1975
Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718 (8th Cir. 1967). … Chapman v. Dunn, 414 F.2d 153 (6th Cir. 1969); Stadia Oil & Uranium Co. v. Wheelis, 251 F.2d 269 (10th Cir. 1957); Baumel v. Rosen, 283 F.Supp. 128 (D.Md.1968), modified at 412 F.2d 571 (4th Cir. 1969).
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna