Case law

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Transportation Communications Union

733 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 6, 1990

Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir.1977). … BRAC v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co., 587 F.2d 903 , 907 (8th Cir.1978). The agreement must be broadly construed with all doubts resolved in favor of the Board’s award. Walsh v.

Missouri v. Cannon (In Re Cannon)

36 B.R. 450 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 20, 1983

The State argues the applicability of Nathanson v. … In that case, however, the Board was the only party entitled to enforce the underlying act, and the backpay order was defined as “a command to pay an amount owed the Board as agent for the injured employees.”

Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. United Drug Co.

53 F. Supp. 744 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 6, 1944

Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co., 316 U.S. 203 , 62 S.Ct. 1022 , 86 L.Ed. 1381 ; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 240 U.S. 251 , 36 S.Ct. 269 , 60 L.Ed. 629 ; Wolf Bros. & Co. v. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 8 Cir., 206 F. 611 ; Dickinson v. O. & W. Thum Co., 6 Cir., 8 F.2d 570 .

Kuhlmeier v. Hazelwood School Dist.

578 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 24, 1984

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). However, that discretion is not without limits. Id.; Tinker v. … Familias Unidas v. Briscoe, 619 F.2d 391, 403 (5th Cir.1980). Accord, Thomas v. Board of Trustees, 515 F.Supp. 280 , 292 n. 12 (S.D.Tex.1981).

St. Louis University v. Blue Cross Hospital Serv., Inc.

393 F. Supp. 367 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 18, 1975

Louis University dispute by the BCA Provider Appeals Committee, violated due process by reason of the BCA affiliation of a majority of the Board members. I find the teaching of Goldberg v. … Three of the five Board members who conducted the subject hearing, Chairman Green, Hankle, and Moeller, were BCA employees.

Ft. Zumwalt School Dist. v. MISSOURI BD. OF EDUC.

865 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 11, 1994

ZUMWALT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. MISSOURI STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, and Robert and Ann Clynes, as Parents and Next Friends of Nicholas Clynes, Defendants. No. 4:93CV01710 GFG. United States District Court, E.D. … In Miener v.

Bender v. City of St. Ann

816 F. Supp. 1372 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 26, 1993

These requests were made both to the Board of Adjustment and to the Board of Alderman. These requests were denied. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

United States v. Young

370 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 7, 1974

“A registrant might provide the board with a mailing address and still fail to keep the board informed of his home address”. United States v. … She gave the board the defendant’s Minnesota address and through this address the board contacted defendant. In United States v.

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BREWERS & MALTSTERS LOCAL UN. NO. 6

346 F. Supp. 239 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 18, 1972

Ry. & Motor Coach Employees v. … the processes of the National Labor Relations Board.

MacOn County Samaritan Memorial Hosp. v. Sullivan

841 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 1992

. *918 Spencer Fane Britt & Browne, Charles F. Myers, James A. Snyder, Peggy F. Schmitt, Kansas City, MO, for plaintiff. Wesley D. Wedemeyer, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, MO, Frank V. … Samaritan requested that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board ("PRRB") acknowledge jurisdiction and grant expedited judicial review on the legality of 42 C.F.R. § 412.92 (a)(3).

Phelps-Roper v. City of Manchester, Missouri

738 F. Supp. 2d 947 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 8, 2010

Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 460 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); see also Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 715 , 120 S.Ct. 2480 , 147 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000). … See, e.g., Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 26 v.

Masterson v. United States

455 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 19, 1978

Jurisdiction is alleged to lie under the holdings of Edwards v. United States, 574 F.2d 937 (8th Cir. 1978), and Kortness v. United States, 514 F.2d 167 (8th Cir. 1975). … The Board reissued the guidelines as emergency directives, see 5 U.S.C. § 553 (b)(3)(B), in 1974, and they have re *1211 mained effective ever since. See Kortness v.

In Re American Milling Co.

270 F. Supp. 2d 1112 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 12, 2003

Louis, MO, for Lue Willie Harvey & James Lewis Brown. William R. Bay, Raymond L. Massey, Michael D. O'Keefe, Sr., John S. Farmer, Suzanne L. Montgomery, Thompson Coburn, St. … Cahokia Marine Service v.

Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers v. J.S. Alberici Construction Co.

736 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 7, 1990

Under 10(k), the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) has both the power and, the Supreme Court has held, the duty to determine the proper assignment of work. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (k); NLRB v. … For example, in Associated General Contractors v.

Moran v. Clarke

213 F. Supp. 2d 1067 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 2, 2002

Gray v. … See, e.g., United States v.

In re Rosser

96 F. 305 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 1899

See Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U. S. 547 , 12 Sup. Ct. 195; Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591 , 16 Sup. Ct. 644. … That act, as will be seen by an examination of the case of Brown v.

Oliver v. MOBERLY MISSOURI SCH. DIST.

427 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 3, 1977

The Superintendent then presented the applicants to the School Board in an "executive session". After some questions, the Board accepted his recommendations. … Smith v. Board of Education of Morrilton School Dist. No. 32, 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966). Superintendent Clark testified in detail about the method used in comparing plaintiffs' applications with their competitors.

Mian v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

600 F. Supp. 104 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1984

INS v. Wang, 450 U.S. 139 , 101 S.Ct. 1027 , 67 L.Ed.2d 123 (1981). … Fotl v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 375 U.S. 217, 229 , 84 S.Ct. 306, 313 , 11 L.Ed.2d 281 (1963); Daneshvar v. Chauvin, 644 F.2d 1248 (8th Cir.1981).

Premachandra v. Mitts

509 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 3, 1981

State of Texas v. Seatrain International, S. A., 518 F.2d 175 (5th Cir. 1975); Baker v. School Bd. of Marion County, Fla., 487 F.Supp. 380 (M.D.Fla.1980); Schrank v. Bliss, 412 F.Supp. 28 (M.D.Fla.1976). … In Sampson v.

United Transportation Union v. Manufacturers Railway Co.

340 F. Supp. 238 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 13, 1972

United Transportation Union, Local Lodge No. 31 v. St. Paul Union Depot Co, 8 Cir., 434 F.2d 220, 222 . … Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 . And, cf. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Airline Division v.