Case law

Noah's, Inc. v. Nark, Inc.

560 F. Supp. 1253 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 1983

Redken Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol, Inc., 501 F.2d 1403, 1404 (9th Cir.1974); American Heritage Ins. Co. v. Heritage Life Ins. Co., 494 F.2d 3, 10 (5th Cir.1974); Wilson Jones Co. v. Gilbert & Bennett Mfg. … Nark, Inc. v. Noah's, Inc., 212 U.S.P.Q. 934 , 946.

Rosebrough Monument Co. v. Memorial Park Cemetery Association

572 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 6, 1983

Bill of Costs Defendant first objects to the inclusion in plaintiff's bill of costs of fees paid to Harlan Brown and Mr. … That decision was subsequently rendered, Hensley v. Eckerhart, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983).

Reinhart v. City of Maryland Heights

930 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 14, 1996

Nonetheless, the Supreme Court decisions upon which defendants chiefly rely in challenging plaintiff's due process claim, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), and Paul v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734-35 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), quoted in Connick, 461 U.S. at 142 , 103 S.Ct. at 1687 .

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. United States

346 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 15, 1972

Judge Frank said, "The Union Pacific Railroad holds about 25% of the outstanding common stock [of Central] . . . and was therefore pretty obviously in control of the Board of Directors." Guttman v. Illinois Cent. R.R. … North American Co. v.

Russell v. Eaves

722 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 28, 1989

Brookins v. State of Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, 586 F.Supp. 29, 30 (W.D.Mo.1984). … Gale v. Moore, 763 F.2d 341, 343 (8th Cir.1985). Neither *560 do the parole board regulations create such an interest. Parker v. Corrothers, 750 F.2d 653 (8th Cir.1984).

Katz v. U.S. Department of Justice

596 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 4, 1984

See Vorbeck v. Whaley, 478 F.Supp. 1117, 1119 (E.D.Mo.1979), affd, 620 F.2d 191 (8th Cir.1980). A final judgment on the merits bars further litigation. See Brown v. … See Bierman v. Tampa Elec. Co., 604 F.2d 929 (5th Cir.1979). Therefore, plaintiff’s present cause of action must be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

Hemphill v. Moore

661 F. Supp. 1192 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 24, 1987

Mount Healthy Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 572 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) (citations omitted). … This immunity extends to individual members of the Board sued in their official capacity. Rollins ex rel. Agosta v. Farmer, 731 F.2d 533, 535 (8th Cir.1984) (citing Monell v.

Treiber v. Lindbergh School Dist.

199 F. Supp. 2d 949 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 11, 2002

Keller v. … Berk v.

LUTHERAN HEALTH CARE ASS'N OF ST. LOUIS v. Shalala

24 F. Supp. 2d 1002 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 28, 1998

HCA Health Services of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Shalala, 27 F.3d 614, 617 (D.C.Cir.1994). Substantial deference must also be accorded the Board's interpretation of the regulations. Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. … Ctr. v. Shalala, 89 F.3d 1411 (9th Cir. 1996); HCA Health Servs. v. Shalala, 27 F.3d at 621 ; Albert Einstein Med. Ctr. v.

Solien v. Carpenters Dist. Council of Greater St. Louis

623 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1985

SOLIEN, Regional Director of Region 14 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CARPENTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF GREATER ST. … In Hoffman v.

Ozark Air Lines, Inc. v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASS'N INTERNAT'L

361 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 25, 1973

Northwest Air Lines, Inc. v. International A. of M. & A. W., 442 F.2d 244 (C.A.8th 1970); Northwest Air Lines, Inc. v. … The Court is aware of Railroad Trainmen v. Terminal Co., 394 U.S. 369 , 89 S.Ct. 1109 , 22 L.Ed.2d 344 (1969), and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

United States v. Dickerson

101 F. Supp. 262 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 1951

Warner Co. v. … Commissioner in the event of an adverse holding is by way of appeal to the federal courts mentioned. * * * It may be that if the Board of Tax Appeals had had the decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering v.

United States v. Braun

39 F. 775 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 2, 1889

Browne, TradeMarks, §§ 338, 374-378, inclusive. … Burton v. Stratton, 12 Fed. Rep. 698, and cases cited; Browne, Trade-Marks, §§ 134, 135.

Wilderman v. Nelson

335 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 17, 1971

Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952); Smith v. Board of Education, 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966); Freeman v. Gould Special School District, supra; Bomar v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S. Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 , 89 S.Ct. *1384 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969); Harnett v.

Park Irmat Drug Corp. v. Express Scripts Holding Co.

310 F. Supp. 3d 1002 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 2018

See Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 1042 , 1048 (9th Cir. 2008) (participation by defendants on same board of directors insufficient to support antitrust conspiracy claim). … Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S., 370 U.S. 294 , 325, 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Irmat alleges there is a submarket-"the market for mail-order pharmacy services to Express Scripts members."

MacDonald v. FERGUSON REORGANIZED SCHOOL DIST. R-2

530 F. Supp. 469 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 8, 1982

Board of Education, 453 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1971) and the size of the respective schools, U. S. v. … Smith v. Board of Education of Morrilton School District No. 32, 365 F.2d 770, 782 (8th Cir. 1966).

In Re Malone

592 F. Supp. 1135 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 28, 1984

Smith v. Town of Clarkton, N.C., 682 F.2d 1055, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1982); Resident Advisory Board v. … Wend Investment Co., 672 F.2d 1305 , 1311 (9th Cir.1982); Resident Advisory Board v.

Smith v. Rexall Drug Co.

415 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 20, 1976

Browne, Jack L. Whitacre, Sandra L. Schermerhorn, Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Kansas City, Mo., and Paul S. Kuelthau, Moller, Talent & Kuelthau, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant. MEMORANDUM WANGELIN, District Judge. … Plaintiff also alleged that the settlement agreement of Garbs v.

Johnson v. SSM Healthcare System

988 F. Supp. 2d 1080 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 2013

Komoroski submitted the MEC’s recommendation to the Board for final action to be taken at the Board’s July 26, 2010 meeting. … See, Brader v. Allegheny General Hosp., 167 F.3d 832 (3d Cir.1999); Austin v. McNamara, 979 F.2d 728 (9th Cir.1992).

Carson v. Pierce

546 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1982

See Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 1977). … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 295 (1979); Griffin v. Harris, 571 F.2d 767, 772 (3d Cir. 1978). Like any other government agency, HUD must comply with its own published regulations.