Case law

Sykes v. Sweeney

638 F. Supp. 274 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 2, 1986

Inlow, 519 F.2d 744 (8th Cir.1975); on remand from Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975); Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir.1961); Dillon v. … Va., 719 F.2d 69 (4th Cir.1983); Boykins v. Fairfield Board of Education, 492 F.2d 697, 701 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975); Nash v.

United States v. Hesse

293 F. Supp. 991 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 1968

See, e. g., United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 , 85 S.Ct. 850 , 13 L.Ed.2d 733 (1965), citing Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed 567 (1946); Batterton v. … See, e. g., Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389 , 74 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed. 132 (1953); Batterton v. United States, supra.

City of St. Louis v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.

57 F. Supp. 549 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 27, 1944

See Brown v. Brown, 347 Mo. 45 , loc.cit. 48, 146 S.W.2d 553 . … Louis v. Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, 97 F.2d 726 , loc. cit. 728: “Why did the Board of Aldermen use this qualifying phrase?”

Grasso v. United States

535 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 1982

Roth v. Board of Regents of State Colleges, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … However, Arnett v.

Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection District

978 F. Supp. 2d 1016 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 2013

Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp., 172 F.3d 531, 535 (8th Cir.1999). See also Artis v. Francis Howell N. … See Dennis v.

Gatewood v. City of O'Fallon, Missouri

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 2022

See Brown v. City of O’Fallon, 728 S.W.2d 595, 596 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987) (reviewing under the state’s APA the impeachment of a city mayor and reversing impeachment on the ground that board members were biased). … See ECF No. 16 at 6-7 (describing proceedings); see also Brown v.

Green v. Missouri

734 F. Supp. 2d 814 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 17, 2010

Although the Supreme Court of Missouri held that the Board is an "agency of the state" in Smith v. … Louis Police Board is a state agency. Hodges v. City of St. Louis, 217 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Mo.2007); Smith v. State, 152 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Mo. 2005); State ex rel. Sayad v. Zych, 642 S.W.2d 907, 910 (Mo.1982).

Klein v. Victor

903 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 13, 1995

Pulitzer Publishing Co., 684 S.W.2d 473, 477 (Mo.Ct.App.1984); Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146, 150 (Mo.1969). … Plaintiff Klein alleges that defendants falsely stated that she was terminated *1336 by the Governing Board of the Hanover Township Mental Health Board in 1989.

Wren v. T.I.M.E.-D.C., Inc.

453 F. Supp. 582 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1978

Other over-the-road drivers are placed on the “extra board”. Extra board drivers haul freight as it becomes available. They are required to be available for dispatch twice daily. … Thus he remained on the extra board. He was usually not called on Friday nights or Saturdays. When the extra board was exhausted, including less senior drivers, plaintiff was called.

African-American Citizens for Change v. Robbins

825 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1993

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to apply Section 2 of the Act to an appointive system for school board members. Searcy v. Williams, 656 F.2d 1003, 1010 (5th Cir.1981) aff'd, Hightower v. … Bradley v. Indiana State Election Board, 797 F.Supp. 694, 697 (S.D.Ind.1992).

Kausler v. Campey

788 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 14, 1992

Local 314, Nat’l Post Office Mail Handlers v. National Post Office Mail Handlers, 572 F.Supp. 133, 138 (E.D.Mo.1983). … Morrissey v. Curran, 650 F.2d 1267, 1274 (2d Cir.1981). The size of the increases alone does not give plaintiffs “good cause” to bring a section 501 action.

Vorbeck v. McNeal

407 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 19, 1976

Melton v. City of Atlanta, supra at 319-20; Atkins v. City of Charlotte, supra at 1076. … Louis City Board of Police Commissioners, this Court will not grant injunctive relief from Rule 8.621. Atkins v. City of Charlotte, supra at 1078. Accordingly, the request for injunctive relief will be denied.

Hall v. Secretary of Army

259 F. Supp. 2d 939 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 11, 2003

See Chandler v. United States Air Force, 255 F.3d 919 , 921 (8th Cir.2001). The authority of this court in reviewing such board decisions is limited. … It is not for this court but the board to make that decision. See Am. Diversified Foods, Inc. v.

Ryan v. Hershey

308 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 17, 1969

Oestereich v. Selective Service Local Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968); Clark v. Gabriel, 393 U.S. 256 , 89 S.Ct. 424 , 21 L.Ed.2d 418 (1968). … United States v. Kanner, 416 F.2d 522 (9th Cir. 1969); United States v. Maine, 417 F.2d 951 (10th Cir. 1969); United States v. Jennison, 402 F.2d 51 (6th Cir. 1968); DuVernay v.

Reeves v. American Brake Shoe Co.

74 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 12, 1947

See Ryan v. Standard Oil Co., Mo.App., 144 S.W.2d 170 ; State ex rel. Hancock v. Falkenhainer, et al., 316 Mo. 651 , 291 S.W. 466 . … This, we think, must be ruled under the authority of Giles v. Moundridge Milling Co., 351 Mo. 668 , 173 S.W.2d 745 .

Williams v. City of Marston

857 F. Supp. 2d 852 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 12, 2012

Plaintiff eventually obtained the minutes of the June 11, 2009 Board meeting. … See Canada v. Union Elec. Co., 135 F.3d 1211, 1212 (8th Cir.1997).

United States v. Bliss

667 F. Supp. 1298 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1987

In Tyler v. … Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America, 583 S.W.2d 713, 719 (Mo.1979) (en banc); Retirement Board of the Police Retirement System v. Noel, 652 S.W.2d 874, 877-78 (Mo.Ct.App.1983). In Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v.

Abu Hamdeh v. American Airlines, Inc.

862 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 6, 1994

Rabinowitz v. Scandinavian Airlines, 741 F.Supp. 441, 444 (S.D.N.Y.1990) ( citing Day v. … In addition to these factors, the court should also consider the imminence of the passenger's actual boarding of the defendant airline's flight. Buonocore v.

McGee v. South Pemiscot School District R-V

545 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 8, 1982

Mulholland v. Schneider Service Co., Inc., 661 F.2d 708, 711 (8th Cir. 1981). (citations omitted). … His situation is very similar to one of the plaintiffs in Smith v. Board of Education, 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966). (Opinion by then Circuit Judge Blackmun).

Zimmer v. United States

702 F. Supp. 757 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 28, 1988

Miller v. Scholl, 594 S.W.2d 324, 329 (Mo.App.1980); Langton v. Brown, 591 S.W.2d at 88 . … Yoos v. Jewish Hospital, 645 S.W.2d at 183 ; Miller v. Scholl, 594 S.W.2d at 329 ; Langton v. Brown, 591 S.W.2d at 88 .