Case law

Lacy v. Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 11, 2021

See United States v. … The Complaint Plaintiff filed the instant complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole.

Neighborhood Enterprises v. City of St. Louis, Mo.

718 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 29, 2010

Group v. Finke, 252 S.W.3d 227, 233 (Mo.App.2008). This Court will not "disturb [the Board's] decision unless it is clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence." Medusa Aggregates Co. v. … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976).

Doe v. Bell

367 F. Supp. 3d 966 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 2019

Lujan v. … Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett , 531 U.S. 356 , 363, 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001). Eleventh Amendment immunity extends to state agencies which are considered an arm of the State.

Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Railway Co.

135 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 16, 1954

Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & S. S. … Co. v. White House, 212 F.2d 22 , and Allain v.

Jorgensen v. Ericson

81 F. Supp. 614 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 3, 1949

Co. et al. v. Carborundum Co. et al., 3 Cir., 155 F.2d. 746 . … See also: International Standard Electric Corporation v. Kingsland, Comm’r of Patents, C.A.D.C., 169 F.2d 890 ; Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co. et al. v. Carborundum Co. et al., supra.

Calvin v. Rupp

334 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 20, 1971

See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 and Freeman v. Gould Special School District of Lincoln County, 8 Cir., 405 F.2d 1153, 1158 ; and cf. Shelton v. … We deny this contention on the basis of Freeman v. Gould Special School District of Lincoln County, 8 Cir., 405 F.2d 1153 .

Hubbel v. Patrish LLC

903 F. Supp. 2d 813 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 15, 2012

Osthus v. Whitesell Corp., 639 F.3d 841, 844-45 (8th Cir.2011) (citing Sharp v. Parents in Community Action, Inc., 172 F.3d 1034, 1038-39 (8th Cir.1999)). … See Chester v. CMPJ Enterprises, 2007 WL 1994045 , *2 (D.Minn.

Premachandra v. United States

574 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 4, 1983

Thus, if the plaintiff received a reasonable and fair compensation under the Merit Systems Protection Board procedure, then a federal tort claim is not available to him. See Alexander v. … Bishop v. Tice, 622 F.2d 349, 357 (8th Cir. 1980) (damages could have been recovered by resort to the civil service remedies created by Congress); Young v.

Wells v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.

979 F. Supp. 2d 1006 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 27, 2013

Leach v. Board of Police Com’rs of Kansas City, 118 S.W.3d 646, 649 (Mo.Ct.App.2003) (citing Seaton v. … Arbutti, Austin, Brown, Hendricks, Jost, McClain, Pour, Sanders, Sheffer, Waweru. . Brown is only seeking damages from and after the date he became a driver for the home division. .

Sobelman v. Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

444 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 23, 1977

Brown, Goldstein, Tessler, Brown & Geigerman, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff. Jerome M. Rubenstein, Dennis C. Donnelly, Hollye E. Stolz, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant. … Hassel v. Harmon Foods, 454 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1972); Moriss v. Connecticut General Ins. Corp., 9 F.E.P. Cases 66 (D.Conn.1974).

Crigler v. City of St. Louis, Mo.

767 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 15, 1991

Best v. … In that order the Court specifically noted that according to Missouri law, the only method by which the Board can be sued is by suing the individual board members in their official capacity. Best v.

HOPE BAPTIST CH. v. City of Bellefontaine Neighbors

655 F. Supp. 1216 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 16, 1987

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). … A federal court, after all, "should not ... sit as a zoning board of appeals." Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1, 12 , 94 S.Ct. 1536, 1542 , 39 L.Ed.2d 797 (1974) (Marshall, J., dissenting).

Cupples Co. v. American Federation of Labor

20 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 4, 1937

Grace Company v. Leonard Williams et al., 20 F.Supp. 263 , in the District Court for the Western Division of the Western District of Missouri. … In a memorandum opinion filed in the above case, it was stated: "Although the case of Virginian Railway Co. v.

Crow v. Long

107 B.R. 184 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 28, 1989

The lien attaches at the time of the tax assessment, 26 U.S.C. § 6322 ; United States v. City of New Britain, 347 U.S. 81, 85 , 74 S.Ct. 367, 370 , 98 L.Ed. 520 (1954); Rice Investment Co. v. … Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509, 514 , 80 S.Ct. 1277, 1280 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1960); Dugan *187 v. Missouri Neon & Plastic Advertising Company, 472 F.2d 944 , 949 (8th Cir.1973).

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. City of Poplar Bluff

261 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 25, 1966

The insurance company only undertakes to insure those functions; of the City of Poplar Bluff controlled and supervised by the Board of Public Works. In Maryland Casualty Co. v. … . *480 In Inter-State Oil Co. v. Equity Mutual Ins.

Alton Box Bd. Co. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

418 F. Supp. 1149 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 10, 1976

Chelsea Associates v. Rapanos, supra, and Caan v. Kane Miller Corp., supra. … Chelsea Associates v. Rapanos, supra, and Caan v. Kane-Miller Corp., supra, and Eichen v. E. F. Hutton & Co., Inc., 402 F.Supp. 823, 830 (S.D.Calif., 1975).

Mauzy v. Mexico School Dist. No. 59

878 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 28, 1995

of Education ("Board"). … See also Leatherman v.

Chromalloy Am. Corp. v. Sun Chem. Corp.

474 F. Supp. 1341 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 20, 1979

on the board. 22. … General Aircraft Corp. v. Lampert, 556 F.2d 90, 96-7 (1st Cir.1977).

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AUTO., PET. & ALLIED IND. UNION

570 F. Supp. 650 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 12, 1983

In ruling that discharge was an inappropriate punishment, the board exceeded its authority and "dispense[d its] own brand of industrial justice". United Steelworkers of America v. … Therefore, the board's decision did not draw its essence from the contract between the parties and must be vacated. Defendant relies on F.W. Woolworth Co. v.

Sykes v. Sweeney

638 F. Supp. 274 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 2, 1986

Inlow, 519 F.2d 744 (8th Cir.1975); on remand from Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975); Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir.1961); Dillon v. … Va., 719 F.2d 69 (4th Cir.1983); Boykins v. Fairfield Board of Education, 492 F.2d 697, 701 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975); Nash v.