Case law

Ozark Air Lines v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASS'N

577 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 8, 1983

Magnovox Co. v. International Union of Electrical Workers, 410 F.2d 388 , 389 (6th Cir. 1969); Torrington Co. v. Metal Products Workers Union Local 1645, 362 F.2d 677, 680 (2nd Cir.1966); Textile Workers Union v. … Loveless v. Eastern Air Lines, supra, at 1280; Safeway Stores v. American Bakery Workers, Local 111, 390 F.2d at 83-84.

Burt on Behalf of McDonnell Douglas v. Danforth

742 F. Supp. 1043 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 12, 1990

Mich.1986); Lewis v. Sporck, 612 F.Supp. 1316, 1322 (N.D.Cal.1985). The board's mere approval or acquiescence to the challenged conduct does not establish futility. See, e.g., Lewis v. Graves, 701 F.2d at 248 ; Lewis v. … Rather, bias or self-interest on the part of the board must be suggested. See, e.g., Lewis v. Graves, 701 F.2d at 248 ; Lewis v.

Medicine Shoppe Intern., Inc. v. Browne

683 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 25, 1988

683 F.Supp. 731 (1988) MEDICINE SHOPPE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. Eugene J. BROWNE, et al., Defendants. No. 87-2164C-(1). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. April 25, 1988. Stephen H. … Browne and Browne's Pharmacy, Inc., in this Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Jeffco Estates MHC, LLC v. City of Arnold Board of Adjustment

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 2023

Suitum v. … Wilton v.

Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co.

61 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 10, 1945

“We have conferred with President V. O. … In Bates v.

Howard v. Thompson

72 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 1, 1947

As was said in General Committee, Etc. v. Missouri-K.-T. R. … General Committee v. Missouri-K.-T. R. Co., 320 U.S. 323 , 64 S. Ct. 146 , 88 L.Ed. 76 ; General Committees, etc. v. Missouri-K.-T. R. Co., 5 Cir., 132 F. 2d 91 ; Order of Railroad Telegraphers et al. v.

Coalition for Sensible & Humane Solutions v. Wamser

590 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 1984

Clements v. … from voting); see also O'Brien v.

Spencer v. Southeast Missouri Hospital

452 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 10, 1978

See also Barrett v. … See Briscoe v. Bock, supra; accord, Allen v. Sisters of St. Joseph, 361 F.Supp. 1212 (N.D.Tex.1973) (factually similar to the instant cause).

Allen v. Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 2022

See Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782 (1978); Jackson v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 306 Fed. Appx. 333 (8th Cir. 2009). A suit against the MDOC is, in effect, a suit against the State of Missouri. … See Heck v.

Mccaskill v. Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 11, 2022

) Case No. 4:22-cv-00220-SRC ) MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS BOARD … Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948); see also Lee v. McDonald’s Corp., 231 F.3d 456, 459 (8th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Pyrtle

299 F. Supp. 1103 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 9, 1969

Ed. 132 (1953); Matyastik v. United States, 392 F.2d 657 (5th Cir.1968); Batterton v. United States, 260 F.2d 233 (8th Cir.1958). Not all procedural irregularities will invalidate the orders of the local board. … United States v. Longworth, 269 F.Supp. 971 (S.D.Ohio 1967). It must appear, however, that the writing received by the local board is more than a mere transmittal to the appeal board. Storey v.

Sundra v. St. Louis American League Baseball Club

87 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 14, 1949

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Rishgold v. … Judge Black in the case of Niemiec v.

Lacks v. FERGUSON REORGANIZED SCHOOL DIST., R-2

936 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 15, 1996

. § 1367 , and must apply Missouri law in reviewing the board's decision. See, e.g., Carrington v. Mahan, 51 F.3d 106, 107 (8th Cir.1995). … Board of Educ., Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 782 (Mo.1976) (en banc).

Miller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

325 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 22, 1971

Plaintiffs argued the theory that under the holdings in Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 (1941) and Quinn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 439 S.W.2d 533 (Mo. … Co. v.

Browning v. Grote Meat Co.

703 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 1988

See Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Massachusetts, 471 U.S. 724, 739 , 105 S.Ct. 2380, 2389 , 85 L.Ed.2d 728 (1985); Shaw v. … See 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (c)(1); Pilot Life Insurance Co. v.

Veneri v. Circuit Court of Gasconade County

528 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 1981

And see Hicks v. United States Board of Paroles and Pardons, 550 F.2d 401, 403 (8th Cir. 1977); Mack v. McCune, 551 F.2d 251, 253 (10th Cir. 1977). … Sockel v.

In Re Town Crier Bottling Co.

123 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 16, 1954

In United States v. … Brown v. Four-In-One Coal Co., 6 Cir., 286 F. 512 . The corporate directors and stockholders may still function so long as they do not interfere with or impede the bankruptcy administration.

Adler v. Chicago & Southern Air Lines

41 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 15, 1941

Co. v. Solum, 1917, 247 U.S. 477 , 38 S.Ct. 550 , 62 L.Ed. 1221 . The Supreme Court held in the case of United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co., 1932, 284 U.S. 474 , 52 S. … by that board that the practice complained of is unlawful or unreasonable, and until the plaintiff is able to allege in a complaint that he has exhausted all of his remedies before that board.

Lacy v. Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 11, 2021

See United States v. … The Complaint Plaintiff filed the instant complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Missouri Department of Corrections Board of Probation and Parole.

Neighborhood Enterprises v. City of St. Louis, Mo.

718 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 29, 2010

Group v. Finke, 252 S.W.3d 227, 233 (Mo.App.2008). This Court will not "disturb [the Board's] decision unless it is clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence." Medusa Aggregates Co. v. … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976).