Case law

J.Y.C.C. v. Doe Run Resources, Corp.

380 F. Supp. 3d 921 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 11, 2019

Brown v. Felsen , 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n.10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Issue preclusion may be raised in a motion to dismiss. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano , 695 F.3d 758 , 764 (8th Cir. 2012). … Ross v. Board of Educ. of Tp. High School Dist. 211 , 486 F.3d 279 , 284 (7th Cir. 2007) ("the fact that an appeal was lodged does not defeat the finality of the judgment" for preclusion purposes.").

Gorsuch v. Formtek Metal Forming, Inc.

803 F. Supp. 2d 1016 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 2011

However, these employees held no stock in FMF, no ownership interest in FMF, no influence with the Board of Directors of FMF. … See, Helms v.

Southwestern Bell Telephone v. Missouri Public Service Commission

461 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 14, 2006

In Global NAPs, the Second Circuit was required to determine, inter alia, whether the Vermont Public Service Board "overstepped its authority in concluding that Board-determined calling areas govern whether traffic is subject … Global NAPs, Inc. v.

McClurg v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

322 F.R.D. 364 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 2017

Thompson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 207 S.W.3d 76, 116 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006) (citing Koerper & Co., Inc. v. Unitel Int'l, Inc., 739 S.W.2d 705, 706 (Mo. 1987)). … Burns v.

In Re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Ep Lit.

736 F. Supp. 1007 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 26, 1990

Brown, Fort Wayne, Ind., Rodger N. Bowman, Clarksville, Tenn., H. Sol Clark, Clark & Clark, Savannah, Ga., Richard F. Huck, III, Evans & Dixon, St. … Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. at 900 n. 16, 104 S.Ct. at 1550 n. 16; Skelton v. General Motors Corp., 860 F.2d 250 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 53 , 107 L.Ed.2d 22 (1989); Brown v.

C.H. v. Pattonville School District

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 2025

See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (explaining a district court has the power “to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order”). … /d. at 2; see Ward v. Smith, 721 F.3d 940, 942 (8th Cir. 2013).

Scottrade, Inc. v. Variant, Inc.

122 F. Supp. 3d 869 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 2015

Prods., Inc. v. Factual Mut. Ins. Co., 890 F.Supp.2d 1129, 1139 (E.D.Mo.2012) (quoting Shahan v. Shahan, 988 S.W.2d 529, 534 (Mo.1999)). … For instance, in Zipper v.

Bridges v. O'Malley

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 18, 2024

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … See Brown v. Barnhart, 282 F.3d 580, 581 (8th Cir. 2002).

Cherry v. Ritenour School Dist.

253 F. Supp. 2d 1085 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 31, 2003

On March 26, 2001, Plaintiff was notified that the Board of Education had voted not to re-employ her for the 2001-2002 school year. Mr. … Mole v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1439, AFL-CIO v. Union Electric Co.

585 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 17, 1984

United Air Lines v. … See Crosland v. Charlotte Eye, Ear and Throat Hosp., supra at 213; Alford v. City of Lubbock, Tex., supra. 9.

Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council, et al. v. Landmark Interiors, LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 8, 2025

LOUIS, an employee benefit plan, and (3) the BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund of St. Louis; (4) ST. … Taylor v. City of Ballwin, 859 F.2d 1330, 1333 (8th Cir. 1988) (citing Pope v.

International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 2023

SMART seeks to enforce an arbitration award issued by the First Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board (“Board”) in Docket No. 50878, Award No. 31034 (the “Award”), under Section 3 First (p) of the Railway … Terra Int'l, Inc. v. Mississippi Chem. Corp., 119 F.3d 688, 691 (8th Cir. 1997).

Missouri ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Cuffley

927 F. Supp. 1248 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 11, 1996

The Supreme Court recently rejected this argument in Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 2440 , 132 L.Ed.2d 650 (1995). … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1, 137 , 81 S.Ct. 1357, 1432 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961) (Black, J., dissenting).

Central Hardware Co. v. Central States

595 F. Supp. 414 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 15, 1984

Salomon v. Crown Life Ins. Co., 536 F.2d 1233, 1238 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 961 , 97 S.Ct. 387 , 50 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976); C & M Developers, Inc. v. Berbiglia, 585 S.W.2d 176, 183 (Mo.App.1979). … Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 1551, 1558 , 80 L.Ed.2d 2 (1984). The rule of "per se" unreasonable tying arrangements was first announced in International Salt Co. v.

Campbell "66" Express, Inc. v. Rundel

463 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 14, 1978

Thereafter, defendant Rundel filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board, to no avail. … In Boys Markets, Inc. v.

Henderson v. Lyft Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 29, 2023

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Normally, this should “be the place where the corporation maintains its headquarters,” so long that the headquarters is “the nerve center, and not simply an office where the corporation holds is board meetings.”

City of St. Louis v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. INC.

70 F. Supp. 2d 1008 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 2, 1999

United States Gypsum Co., 811 F.Supp. 1200 , (E.D.Mich.1992)(concluding that the Michigan Supreme Court would accept section 115 as a statement of the common law of restitution); Board of Education v. … No. 500 v.

Dwayne Jemon Harris Estate v. City of Florissant

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 2025

Bader v. Keefe Supply Co., 1:18- cv-0115-RWS, 2018 WL 3391546, at *2 (E.D. Mo. July 12, 2018). See also E.D. Mo. … See Joubert v. Brown William Tobacco Corp., 2:10-cv-0887-RSM, 2010 WL 11527327, at *2 (W.D. Wash. July 14, 2010) (“Estates may not proceed pro se in federal court.”); Arnold v.

White v. Colvin

129 F. Supp. 3d 813 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 8, 2015

See Renstrom v. Astrue, 680 F.3d 1057, 1066 (8th Cir.2012). (quoting Brown v. Astrue, 611 F.3d 941, 955 (8th Cir.2010)); Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 838, 846 (8th Cir.2009); Medhaug v. … See also Brown v.

Official Creditors Committee v. Blades (In re New Madrid Nursing Home, Inc.)

74 B.R. 240 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 12, 1987

The Boards of Directors of all the family corporations also consisted of members of the Blades family. … See, Appellants’ Brief p. 9; citing, Fett v. Moore, 438 F.Supp. 726 (E.D.Va.1977). Without great detail, this Court finds that: *243 1. There are no indications of fraud or bad faith. 2.