Case law

Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. Wyllie

396 F. Supp. 2d 1033 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 2005

Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); General Electric Capital Corp. v. … Id.; Brown v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 776 S.W.2d 384, 388 (Mo.1989). Hartford now argues that exclusions (e) and (n) apply.

Johnston v. Bowersox

119 F. Supp. 2d 971 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 2, 2000

Ground 1: The Exclusion for Cause of Juror Osborne Brown In Ground One, petitioner challenges the trial court's striking venire member Osborne Brown for cause based on his views concerning the death penalty. … State v.

King

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 23, 2026

Missouri courts broadly answered yes, requiring the City to accept the Board’s obligations to indemnify former officers, among other liabilities. See, e.g., Holmes v. … See, e.g., Doc. 34 at 2; Swink v. Love, No. 4:25-CV-569-ZMB, Doc. 40 at 32 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 10, 2025); Welle, 2026 WL 60356, at *2. 1 The Board itself is a non-suable entity. Edwards v.

Tyler v. Stallos

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 29, 2025

See Maness v. District Court of Logan County-Northern Div., 495 F.3d 943, 945 (8th Cir. 2007) (citing Johnson v. … Maness, 495 F.3d at 945 (citing Snyder v.

Hawkins v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

522 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981

In Allen v. … The Eighth Circuit has addressed this position in Brown v.

Howard v. Rolufs

338 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 20, 1972

In Powell v. … Brown v. Beto, 377 F.2d 950, 956 (5th Cir. 1967). Zane White was acting within his jurisdiction when he relayed to plaintiff the possible consequences of pleading not guilty.

GENERAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION v. United States

258 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 26, 1966

Woolrich Woolen Mills v. United States, 289 F.2d 444 (C.A.3). … Wolfington Body Co. v. Smith, 99 F.Supp. 788 (D.C. Pa.) See also, Case v. Comm'r, 103 F.2d 283, 286 (C.A.9).

Miener v. Special School Dist. of St. Louis County

580 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 1984

Powell v. Defore, 699 F.2d 1078, 1082 (11th Cir.1983); McGovern v. Sullins, 676 F.2d 98, 99 (4th Cir.1982); Anderson v. Thompson, 658 F.2d 1205, 1214-17 (7th Cir.1981); Rollison v. … Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).

Swink

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 23, 2026

See, e.g., Doc. 40 at 32; Welle, 2026 WL 60356, at *2. 1 The Board itself is a non-suable entity. Edwards v. Baer, 863 F.2d 606, 609 (8th Cir. 1988). … The Eighth Circuit in Gorman v.

Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Rinehart

704 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 9, 1989

As authority for the foregoing, see American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Brown, 657 S.W.2d 273 (Mo. App.1983); Clarkson v. MFA Mutual Insurance Company, 413 S.W.2d 10 (Mo. … App.1967); Countryside Casualty Company v. McCormick, 722 S.W.2d 655 (Mo.App. 1987). ORDER A memorandum dated this day is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this order.

Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Robertshaw Controls Co.

966 F. Supp. 1509 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 15, 1997

There appears to be no functional difference between the White-Rodgers and Robertshaw control boards. See Def.Exh. G. 24. … After his conversation with Potter, Geary made a prototype layout of the European customer correction, which involved a redesign of the circuit board.

Krohn v. Forsting

11 F. Supp. 2d 1082 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 17, 1998

Service Board. … See 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq.; 29 C.F.R. § 825.400 (a); Danfelt v. Board of County Commissioners of Washington Co., 998 F.Supp. 606, 609 (D.Md.1998); Spurlock v. NYNEX, 949 F.Supp. 1022, 1030 (W.D.N.Y.1996).

Allen v. Weinberger

546 F. Supp. 455 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 1, 1982

United Forest Products Co. v. Baxter, 452 F.2d 11, 16 (8th Cir. 1971). 4. … Pence v. Brown, 627 F.2d 872, 875 (1980). Nothing indicates to the Court that the Army acted in bad faith with respect to assigning petitioner his entry-level rank. 6.

Bauman v. United States

106 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 1952

106 F.Supp. 384 (1952) BAUMAN v. UNITED STATES. ROSENBERGER v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 8264(2), 8265(2). United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D. July 28, 1952. *385 Lowenhaupt, Waite, Chasnoff & Stolar, H. M. … Two cases cited by defendant from this Circuit, Tate v. C. I. T., 8 Cir., 97 F.2d 658 , and Tootle v. C. I. T., 8 Cir., 58 F.2d 576, 580 , call for consideration.

Graves v. Meystrik

425 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 3, 1977

Brown, and George E. Taff, members of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of the State of Missouri. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571-72 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Ford v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 11, 2021

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 275 S.W.3d 748, 791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (quoting Richcreek v. Gen. Motors Corp., 908 S.W.2d 772, 775 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995); § 537.760. … Mash v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., No. 4:03CV0485 TCM, 2004 WL 3316246, at *11 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 26, 2004) (citing VanBooven v. Smull, 938 S.W.2d 324, 328 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)).

In re Higdon

269 F. 150 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 1920

Mc-Intire v. Wood, 7 Cranch, 504 , 3 L. Ed. 420 . … In Knapp v. Railway Co., 197 U. S. 536 , 25 Sup. Ct. 538, 49 L.

Avis v. Festus R-VI School District

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 5, 2023

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

Glastetter v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

107 F. Supp. 2d 1015 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 14, 2000

Dennis Petro, a board-certified neurologist, and Dr. Kenneth Kulig, who is board certified in toxicology and emergency medicine, are both presented with impressive credentials. … The patient also had Brown-Sequard Syndrome which is caused by spinal cord lesions. He admits that vasospasm is the most likely cause of Brown-Sequard Syndrome. Dr.

Haire v. Calloway

385 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 22, 1974

Jackson v. U. S. Civil Service Commission, 379 F. Supp. 589 (S.D.Tex.1973), Henderson v. Defense Contract Administration, supra. This Court does not agree that a trial de novo is required in all cases. … The Court has examined the entire administrative record in this case and can find no reason to disagree with the findings of the hearing examiner and conclusions of the review board of the Civil Service Commission.