Case law

Dykes v. Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 2021

Estes as next friend for Doe v. Board of Trustees of the Missouri Public Entity Risk Management Fund, 2021 WL 966979 at 7 (Mo. Ct. App. March 16, 2021). … See Hoag v. McBride & Sons Inv. Co., Inc 967 S.w.2d 157, 171 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998) (citing Emery v. Brown Shoe Co., 287 S.W.2d 761, 768 (Mo. 1956); Dow Chemical Co. v. G.S. Robins & Co., 2006 WL 3511494 at *4 (E.D.

Gates v. United States Postal Service

622 F. Supp. 563 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 3, 1985

Miener v. State of Missouri, 673 F.2d at 978 . … In Brown v.

Union Ins. Co. of Providence v. Williams

261 F. Supp. 2d 1150 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 29, 2003

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., All U.S. 242, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. … Co. of Missouri v.

McDonald v. Missouri Department of Corrections

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 2024

Discussion Plaintiff’s ADA Claim The Supreme Court held in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. … .”); Brumfield v.

Goode v. University City Courts

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 26, 2023

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Louis County Courts and Calverton Park Board as defendants in this action.

Mensah

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 10, 2026

See Bonn v. … See Hunter v.

Ingram Barge Co. v. Valley Line Co.

470 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 24, 1979

The credible evidence disclosed that on February 2, 1976, the defendant's tug M/V DRESDEN was boarded by Master Pilot Harry S. Clark at the Mile 166.7 mark on the Illinois River. … At the time of Clark's boarding the tug M/V DRESDEN it had eight barges in tow. Due to the icy conditions existing on the Illinois River it was decided to "double trip" the eight barges.

United States v. Allen

623 F. Supp. 2d 998 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 5, 2009

Florida v. … See United States v. Brown, 49 F.3d 1346, 1349 (8th Cir.1995) (unproven informant requires some independent verification to establish reliability).

Riley v. Olin Corporation

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 21, 2022

Because they fail to state such a claim, the Court grants Olin and its board’s motion to dismiss Riley and Reliford’s failure-to-monitor claim. See Brown v. … See Misischia v. St.

Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Universal Towing Co.

344 F. Supp. 1391 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 23, 1972

When Eugene Maynard, pilot of defendant's tow board Husky came on board for duty at midnight, May 17, 1971, his night orders directed him to arrange a flat surface along the fleet to receive the tow of Walker's "Charlie Walker … Richmond Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp., 170 F.2d 392, 393-394 (4th Cir. 1948); Erlbacher v. Republic Homes Corporation, supra, 263 F.2d at p. 221 ; Edward G. Murray L. & T. Co. v.

Muth v. Cobro Corp.

895 F. Supp. 254 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 11, 1995

Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, 24 F.3d 463 , 464 *257 (3rd Cir.1994); McCray v. Corry Mfg. Co., 872 F.Supp. 209, 213-16 (W.D.Pa.1994); Weaver v. The Ault Corp., 859 F.Supp. 256, 258 (N.D.Tex.1993); Rich v. … McCray v. Corry Mfg ., at 215.

Tyler v. Stallos

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 29, 2025

See Maness v. District Court of Logan County-Northern Div., 495 F.3d 943, 945 (8th Cir. 2007) (citing Johnson v. … Maness, 495 F.3d at 945 (citing Snyder v.

Capitol Indem. Corp. v. 1405 ASSOCIATES

220 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 23, 2002

Watters, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for plaintiff. Christopher B. Bent, Bent Law Firm, P.C., Hazelwood, MO, for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACKSON, District Judge. … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v.

Campbell v. Ward

792 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 27, 1992

Brown & James, Robert S. Rosenthal, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Jacob. Lashly & Baer, James J. Hennelly, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant MO Baptist Med. Ctr. Kortenhof & Ely, Joseph M. Kortenhof, Edward V. Crites, St. … See Rylewicz v. Beaton, 888 F.2d 1175, 1181 (7th Cir.1989); Norton v. Intern'l Harvester Co., 627 F.2d 18 , 22 (7th Cir.1980); Wood v. Worachek, 618 F.2d 1225, 1230 (7th Cir.1980).

Snider v. City of Cape Girardeau

861 F. Supp. 2d 974 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 2012

Pearson v. … (citing Board of the Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).

King

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 23, 2026

Missouri courts broadly answered yes, requiring the City to accept the Board’s obligations to indemnify former officers, among other liabilities. See, e.g., Holmes v. … See, e.g., Doc. 34 at 2; Swink v. Love, No. 4:25-CV-569-ZMB, Doc. 40 at 32 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 10, 2025); Welle, 2026 WL 60356, at *2. 1 The Board itself is a non-suable entity. Edwards v.

Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. Wyllie

396 F. Supp. 2d 1033 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 2005

Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); General Electric Capital Corp. v. … Id.; Brown v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 776 S.W.2d 384, 388 (Mo.1989). Hartford now argues that exclusions (e) and (n) apply.

Ferro Corp. v. SOLUTIA INC.

588 F. Supp. 2d 1022 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 5, 2008

In 2000, defendant applied for subdivision with the Logan Township Planning Board. … NY2 LLC v. Lunney's Pub, Inc., 49 A.D.3d 70 , 852 N.Y.S.2d 32 , 37 (N.Y.Sup.2007) (citing Stratton Group, Ltd. v.

Hawkins v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

522 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981

In Allen v. … The Eighth Circuit has addressed this position in Brown v.

Johnston v. Bowersox

119 F. Supp. 2d 971 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 2, 2000

Ground 1: The Exclusion for Cause of Juror Osborne Brown In Ground One, petitioner challenges the trial court's striking venire member Osborne Brown for cause based on his views concerning the death penalty. … State v.