Case law

United States v. Thomas

223 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 1963

See United States v. Brown, 2 Cir., 236 F.2d 403 . … In the case of United States v.

Shattuck

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 27, 2025

Brown, J. Conway, Captain Adams, Captain Brown, or Percy Arnold were working, he would be refused at least two meals per day. Id. … Brown, J. Conway, Captain Adams, Captain Brown, Perry Arnold, Unknown Smith, Caleb Thompson, Montgomery, Batreal, Howder, and Myler. 2.

Blankenship v. Chamberlain

695 F. Supp. 2d 966 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 1, 2010

See Ward v. … In Coan v.

Russell v. Payne

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 7, 2022

Petitioner only appealed the motion court’s denial of his claim as to Meschella Brown (Doc. 13- 8).3 Therefore, Petitioner’s claim as to Theresa Young and Keith Brown is procedurally defaulted. See Arnold v. … Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 105 (2011) (internal citations omitted). The Court agrees that trial counsel’s decision not to call Brown was reasonable.

Katz v. School District

411 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 21, 1976

See Brennan v. Prince William Hospital Corporation, 503 F.2d 282 (4th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 972 , 95 S.Ct. 1392 , 43 L.Ed.2d 652 (1975); Shultz v. … See Hodgson v. Fairmont Supply Co., 454 F.2d 490 (4th Cir. 1972).

Fisher v. Reorganization Inv. Co.

31 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 23, 1940

The first Board of Directors of this corporation was made up of office associates of Judge Cave; it held a Board of Directors’ meeting in the office of Judge Cave on May 26, 1930, and the temporary Board of Directors adopted … Amick v. Empire Trust Co., supra; Nevins v. Moore, 221 Mo. 330 , 120 S.W. 43 ; McClintock v. Central Bank, 120 Mo. 127 , 24 S.W. 1052 ; Schaaf v. Fries, 90 Mo.App. 111 .

In Re Missouri Pac. R. Co.

13 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 1935

C., being a secured creditor of the debtor, heretofore filed a motion in this court, in effect averring that the debtor, through its then officers and board of directors, had on December 31, 1930, and prior to the commencement … Co. v. Seely, 45 Mo. 212 , 100 Am.Dec. 369. A corporation, and a railroad is no exception to the rule, can lawfully exercise such powers and such powers only as are conferred on it by its charter. Hamburg Bank v.

Croffut v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

575 F. Supp. 1264 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 5, 1984

In Zipes v. … Board of Governors, 549 F.Supp. 225 (N.D.Ill.1982) (period did not begin to run when plaintiff's mother received notice).

Continental Ins. Co. v. Washeon Corp.

524 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 28, 1981

See Alamo Chemical Transportation Co. v. … Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line R. R. Co., 554 F.2d 1299, 1302 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 975 , 98 S.Ct. 533 , 54 L.Ed.2d 467 (1977); Lanasse v.

Air Terminal Cab, Inc. v. United States

341 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 5, 1972

The keys to the taxicabs are kept by the company in the service station office on a board when the taxicabs are not in use. … See, also, United States v. Fleming, supra ; Woods v. Nicholas, 163 F.2d 615 (10th Cir. 1947).

Londoff Bowling Lanes v. Landmark North Cty. Bank

516 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 21, 1981

Londoff, Plaintiffs, v. LANDMARK NORTH COUNTY BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Leon Neuman, President and Director, and Gustave Saettele, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Defendants. No. 81-337C(1). … See Esler v. Northrup Corp., 86 F.R.D. 20 (E.D.Mo.1979). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

Morgan v. Finnegan

87 F. Supp. 274 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 21, 1949

Murawski v. … Brennan v. Commissioner, 4 T.C.1260(Pa.), and Upthegrove v. Commissioner, 33 B.T.A. 952 (Mo.).

Powell v. Bowersox

895 F. Supp. 1298 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 15, 1995

Petitioner's friends eventually joined in, beating the victims with bricks, boards and branches. … Brown or Ms. Seacoul which would necessitate their removal from the panel for cause.

Tenny v. United States

441 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 23, 1977

In Jimenez v. … In the ARB decision, the Board found that "Mr. Arbuckle recognized the children, apparently contributed to their support, and regularly visited with them".

Wirtz v. Barnes Grocer Co.

271 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1967

Hammack and Darrell Bowling, and these individuals comprised the Board of Directors in that year. However, Mr. … The government relies primarily on Wirtz v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co. of Savannah, 362 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1966); Wirtz v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 365 F.2d 641 (10th Cir. 1966); and West v.

King v. Apfel

991 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 15, 1997

Fountain v. Railroad Retirement Board, 81 F.3d 784, 788 (8th Cir.1996). … See Brown v.

American Family Mutual Insurance v. Mueller

570 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 10, 1983

Leonard Wiedershine, who is a Board Certified Psychiatrist and is in private practice in St. … Co., v. Politte, 602 S.W.2d 943, 946 (Mo.App.1980). In defining, “intentional” acts, Crull v.

Carmi v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist.

471 F. Supp. 119 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 1979

O'Toole, Jr., Individually and in their official capacities as members of the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Peter F. … In United Handicapped Fed. v. Andre, 558 F.2d 413 (8th Cir. 1977), the Eighth Circuit relying upon Lloyd v. Illinois Reg. Transp.

Haynes-Wilkinson v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSP.

131 F. Supp. 2d 1140 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 2001

Report of Final Action" filed with the Missouri State Board of Nursing in March 1996, which Plaintiff attached to her Complaint as Exhibit 1.. … Scheuer v.

Anheuser-Busch v. LOCAL UNION NO. 133, INTERN.

477 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 12, 1979

The Union cites Buffalo Forge Co. v. … NOTES [1] Boys Markets, Inc. v.