Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.35s

  • McCormick v. St. John and Brown

    236 Mo. App. 72 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1941

    [Reid v. Moulton (Mo.), 210 S.W. 34 ; In Re Henry Co. Mut. Burial Assn., 229 Mo. App. 300 , 77 S.W.2d 124 ; Bruegge v. State Bank of Wellston (Mo.), 74 S.W.2d 835 (cited by respondents and numerous cases).] … Mo. 1939), which deprived Judge BOYD of any of the powers of Judge GIDEON (State ex rel. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First State Bank of Joplin v. Brown

    549 S.W.2d 369 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1977

    In Interest of R.L.P., 536 S.W.2d 41, 43 [7] (Mo.App.1976); Cox v. Lee, 530 S.W.2d 273, 274 [1] (Mo.App.1975); World Franchisers, Inc. v. Birk, 456 S.W.2d 606, 607 [1] (Mo.App.1970). … Cochran v. DeShazo, 538 S.W.2d 598, 600-601 [5] (Mo. App.1976).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. Board of Trade

    78 Mo. App. 557 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1899

    St. 391; People v. Union, 118 N. Y. 101 ; Commonwealth v. Union League, 135 Pa. St. 325 ; Connelly *565 v. Masonic M. B. Ass’n, 58 Conn. 552 ; Houston v. Rentlinger, 91 Ky. 333 ; State v. Williams, 16 N. … Pitcher v. Board of Trade, 121 Ill. 412 ; People v. Board of Trade, 80 Ill. 134 ; Board of Trade v. Nelson, 162 Ill. 431 ; Haebler v. Produce Exchange, 149 N. Y. 414 ; Osceola Tribe v. Schmidt, 57 Md. 98 ; Karchner v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Board of Education

    599 S.W.2d 254 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 12, 1980

    Stephen & Stephen Properties, Inc. v. State Tax Com’n, supra, at p. 804. The judgment of the trial court is reversed. The decision of the school board to terminate Mrs. … See Merideth v. Board of Ed. of Rockwood R-6 Sch. Dist., 513 S.W.2d 740 (Mo.App.1974) for comprehensive findings in a tenured teacher discharge case.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Brown

    310 S.W.3d 754 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 2010

    Stacey Brown (husband) and Sharon Brown (wife) were married in June 1998. There was one child, T.B., who was born prior to the marriage on February 3, 1994. … Russell v. Rus *759 sell, 210 S.W.3d 191, 199 (Mo. banc 2007); Judy v. Judy, 998 S.W.2d 45, 54 (Mo.App.1999).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias

    83 Mo. App. 633 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1900

    Being therefore free to dispose of the case according to our conceptions of the law we are inclined to adopt the reasoning of this court in the case of Wolff v. Ins. Co., 5 Mo. App. 236 . … injuries on Brown’s head the effects of which is supposed to have caused his death.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Board of Directors

    621 S.W.2d 97 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1981

    Blunt v. Parker, 495 S.W.2d 708, 712 (Mo.App.1973). … Merideth v. Board of Ed. of Rockwood R-6 Sch. Dist., 513 S.W.2d 740, 745 (Mo.App.1974). Jackson concedes her absence from November 20, 1978, to the end of the school year.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Paulus v. Board of Education

    347 S.W.2d 425 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1961

    Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Fenix, Mo.App., 321 S.W.2d 527 , loc. cit. 532; Katz Drug Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., Mo.App., 303 S.W.2d 672 , loc. cit. 680. … Mickelberry’s Food Products Co. v. Haeussermann, Mo., 247 S.W.2d 731 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Board of Directors

    9 S.W.3d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2000

    The board contends that it properly delegated its authority to conduct hearings to *71 a three-member committee of the board. In support of its contention, the board cites Brown Group, Inc. v. … Citing Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 139 (Mo.App.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Travers v. Board of Trustees

    756 S.W.2d 623 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1988

    Clark v. Board of Trustees, Kansas City Employees’ Retirement System, 728 S.W.2d 562 (Mo.App.1987). … Moreover, in White v. Poelker, 521 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.App.1975) both the Board and the court assumed that an employee of the St.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McKenna v. Personnel Advisory Board

    702 S.W.2d 548 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1985

    See Miller v. Watkins, 355 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Mo.1962); Highfill v. Brown, 320 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Mo.1959). … Schwartz v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 578 F2d 417, 420, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 175 (D.C.1978). See Derrickson v. Board of Education, 703 F2d 309, 315 (8th Cir.1983).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment

    39 S.W.3d 76 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 2001

    State Tax Comm’n v. Luten, 459 S.W.2d 375, 378 (Mo. banc 1970). We read section 89.110 in pari materia with section 536.110 RSMo 1994. State ex rel. Wrenn v. … Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 923 S.W.2d 423, 424 (Mo.App.1996); Sandweiss v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, 811 S.W.2d 48, 49 (Mo.App.1991); Drury Displays, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Elam

    70 S.W.3d 448 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2000

    Blanke v. Hendrickson, 944 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). … In support of this argument, Elam, citing Weitzman v. Weitzman, 156 S.W.2d 906 , 908 (Mo.1941); Droz v. Trump, 965 S.W.2d 436, 443 (Mo.App. W.D.1998); and Stephenson v. First Missouri Corp., 861 S.W.2d 651, 656 (Mo.App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Doorack v. Board of Adjustment

    709 S.W.2d 140 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1986

    State Highway Comm’n v. Hoffmann, 132 S.W.2d 27 , 32 (Mo.App.1939). … State Highway Comm’n v. Zahn, 633 S.W.2d 185, 190 (Mo.App.1982).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stoup v. Board of Trustees

    789 S.W.2d 221 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1990

    Conder v. Board of Directors of Windsor School, 567 S.W.2d 377, 379 (Mo.App.1978). Bell v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 711 S.W.2d 950, 955 (Mo.App.1986). … McCall v. McCall Amusement, Inc., 748 S.W.2d 827, 828 (Mo.App.1988). We therefore generally should not substitute our judgment on the evidence for that of the administrative board. See Heitzler v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Massey v. Missouri Dental Board

    698 S.W.2d 562 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1985

    Jones v. The Missouri Dental Board, 687 S.W.2d 579 (Mo.App.1985). Even if we as *564 sume that there was testimony in the Jones’ ease that Dr. … We find no abuse of discretion in reviewing the determination of the Board. Article V, § 18, Missouri Constitution of 1945 As Amended 1976; Board of Education, Mount Vernon Schools, Mount Vernon v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schmidt v. Board of Education

    712 S.W.2d 45 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1986

    Webb, 533 S.W.2d 650, 654 (Mo.App.1976); Kimble v. Worth County R-III Board of Education, 669 S.W.2d 949, 953 (Mo.App.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 331 , 83 L.Ed.2d 268 (1984); Osage Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. … The teachers preface their argument by asserting that Thompson v. Southwest School District, 483 F.Supp. 1170 (W.D.Mo.1980), and Ross v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Missouri Dental Board v. Cohen

    867 S.W.2d 295 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1993

    Sander v. Missouri Real Estate Com’n, 710 S.W.2d 896, 901 (Mo.App.1986). … Edna Entrs., Inc. v. Spirco Envtl., Inc., 853 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Mo.App.1993).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nevels v. Board of Education

    822 S.W.2d 898 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1991

    Cochran v. Board of Education of Mexico School District No. 59, 815 S.W.2d 55, 58-59 (Mo.App.1991). Appellant has briefed five points, but essentially raises four issues. … Citing Blue Springs Reorganized School District IV v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Missouri Dental Board

    687 S.W.2d 579 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1985

    U.S. v. Catlett, 584 F.2d 864, 866 (8th Cir.1978). … State v. Camillo, 610 S.W.2d 116, 120 (Mo.App.1980). Dentist claims the evidence establishes six indicia of the board’s misconduct.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.