Case law

Brown v. State

629 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

The latest ruling is in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981). 3 This court must follow the supreme court’s ruling. The judgment is affirmed. CRIST, P. J., and REINHARD, J., concur. . … State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981) confirms the earlier rulings in Sours I and II. Sours v.

Petterson v. Brown

691 S.W.2d 955 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1985

In State v. McCall, 602 S.W.2d 702 , (Mo.App.1980), Judge Pudlowski wrote: However, when the verdicts on two counts are inconsistent, a reversal is not *959 required. State v. … Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 393-94 , 52 S.Ct. 189, 190-191 , 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932). See also State v. Larkins, 518 S.W.2d 131, 137 (Mo.App.1974).

Brown v. State

783 S.W.2d 428 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1989

Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). … Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 [3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm.

Brown v. State

680 S.W.2d 174 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1984

The facts as contained in Brown’s guilty plea hearing are similar to and are more fully set out in Green v. State, 659 S.W.2d 219 (Mo.App. banc 1983). … As noted earlier, the facts as developed in the guilty plea hearing of Brown, *178 are the same as those developed in the case of his co-actor, Green v. State, supra, at 221. In Green v.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

164 S.W.3d 121 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 2005

Petitioner cross-examined Trooper Gertsen and called one witness, his father, Paul Brown. … The officer further testified that it appeared Brown was unconscious when he requested Brown to give a blood sample. Petitioner has sustained his burden of proof that he did not refuse to submit to a chemical test.

State v. Brown

516 S.W.2d 783 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1974

State v. Neal, 514 S.W.2d 544 (1974). … See also State v. Kennedy, 513 S.W.2d 697 [8] (Mo.App.1974). The Neal decision controls the issue raised here. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. DOWD, C. J., and WEIER and REND-LEN, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Douglas Candy Company

277 S.W.2d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1955

Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 335 Mo. 572 , 73 S.W.2d 264 , 94 A.L.R. 751 ; Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc., 224 Mo, App. 304, 25 S.W.2d 529 ; McFall v. … In Newman v.

Brown v. Hillhaven Convalescent Center

776 S.W.2d 47 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1989

Petersen v. Central Pattern Co., 562 S.W.2d 153, 155-156 (Mo.App.1978). … Cox v. General Motors Corp., 691 S.W.2d 294, 297 [3] (Mo.App.1985). To similar effect see Beyer v. Howard Const. Co., 736 S.W.2d 78, 82 (Mo.App.1987); Birschkus v.

Brown v. Stover

606 S.W.2d 666 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1980

The appeal was dismissed by this court, Brown v. Stover, 596 S.W.2d 498 (Mo.App.1980) for the reason that there was no final appealable judgment since the counterclaim had not been disposed of. … Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

Bradshaw v. Brown Shoe Co.

660 S.W.2d 390 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1983

Malcom v. La-Z-Boy Midwest Chair Company, 618 S.W.2d 725, 728 (Mo.App.1981); Blair v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 593 S.W.2d 650, 655 (Mo.App.1980). … Compare McAdams v. Seven-Up Bottling Works, supra, 429 S.W.2d 284 .

Brown v. State

560 S.W.2d 882 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1977

Movant John Bell Brown (hereafter Defendant) has appealed denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm. … State v. Brown, 480 S.W.2d 843 (Mo.1972). Defendant seeks to set aside his conviction by his present Rule 27.26 motion, contending he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel.

Brown v. Wabash Railway Co.

222 Mo. App. 518 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1926

[See Brown v. Wabash Ry. Co., 274 S. W. 388 .] The facts show that the shipment consisted of twenty-seven horses, five mules and one stallion. … [Taylor v. Sartorius, supra; Spencer v. Dearth, 43 Vt. 96, 98 .]

City of Chillicothe v. Brown

38 Mo. App. 609 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1890

Brown, was a licensed runner for the Leeper House, and that said Leeper House was a public house, and hotel in the city of Chillicothe, Missouri, and that Brown was licensed as such runner, under and by virtue of the provisions … Louis v. Weber, 44 Mo. 547 ; Corrigan v. Gage, 68 Mo. 544 ; Kelly v. Meeks, 87 Mo. 396 . In The City of St. Louis v. Speigel, 8 Mo.

Kansas City v. Brown

521 S.W.2d 761 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1975

Brown appealed to this court. His sole contention here is that the sentences imposed upon him in the circuit court are impermissible under North Carolina v. … Determination of this cause involves application of the principles of North Carolina v. Pearce, supra, Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104 , 92 S.Ct. 1953 , 32 L.Ed.2d 584 (1972), Chaffin v.

Brown v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

197 Mo. App. 317 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1917

in the name of said Rachel Brown and H. … Brown, husband and wife.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

772 S.W.2d 398 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1989

Randles v. Schaffner, 485 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Mo.1972); State ex rel. Kansas City v. Public Service Commission, 362 Mo. 786 , 244 S.W.2d 110, 115 (1951). … Burns v. Swenson, 430 F.2d 771, 778 (8th Cir.1970). “When all persons within the purview of a statute are subjected to like conditions, then they are afforded equal protection of the law.” State v.

Brown v. City of Columbia

495 S.W.3d 831 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2016

ORDER PER CURIAM: Albert Brown appeals- -an award issued by the Labor and '. … Brown contends that the denial of his claim was unsupported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm.

Mayfield v. Brown Shoe Co.

941 S.W.2d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1997

Simmerly v. Bailey Corp., 890 S.W.2d 12, 14 [2] (Mo.App. S.D.1994), citing West v. Posten Const. Co., 804 S.W.2d 743, 744 (Mo.banc 1991). … See Pippin v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., 799 S.W.2d 898, 904 [5] (Mo.App.1990). We reject this part of Brown’s point.

Brown v. Midwest Petroleum Co.

828 S.W.2d 686 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1992

Lustig v. U.M.C. Industries, Inc., 637 S.W.2d 55, 59 (Mo.App.1982). … See Lipton Rlty. v. St. Louis Housing Authority, 705 S.W.2d 565, 569 (Mo.App.1986); See also MAI 4.02 [1980 Revision].

Tines v. Brown Shoe Company

290 S.W.2d 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1956

Kathleen Tines, employed by Brown Shoe Company in August, 1952 as a bookkeeping machine operator, worked as such through December 6, 1952. … In Miller v. St.